Preview

The Meaning of "Between the Hawk and the Buzzard"

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
523 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Meaning of "Between the Hawk and the Buzzard"
“The Hawks and the Buzzards”
Evidently, there is an expression about “being caught between the Hawks and Buzzards” that a lot of older Arkansans may know. It is probably because they heard their relatives talk about it from the generations of relatives that fought on either side of the Civil War. What it shows is that states like Arkansas and Kentucky, which had normally been associated with the Southern states and their traditions, were somehow caught on the border between the Union states and the Confederate states. Some of their people were for slavery, while many were opposed to it. These borders often became the sites of great battles, which forced peacemakers on either side to have to choose sides.
The “hawk” for many Arkansans was the federal government putting pressure on the southern states to join ranks with them, the Union. The “buzzards” were the small militia groups of southerners putting pressure on the state to keep slavery as well as the pickets of Indian tribes still living in the area. Because Arkansas was so closer to Missouri, there was a regular presence of Hawks in the state, which included invasions from Union Army generals from Missouri on the northwest corner of Arkansas at the battle of Pea Ridge which killed 2,000 Confederate soldiers and 1,400 Union soldiers. There were battles at Ft. Smith in the northwest part of the state, where the Confederates were able to chase off the Yankees. Ironically, the Kansas Jayhawks mascot gets its name for the same reason. Kansas was also like Arkansas, near the border of the Union, with groups of “guerillas” surrounding the border, defending their side of the war with unorthodox raids.
For many Arkansans the Federal Government /Hawks were demanding and abusive. As the war continued to linger longer, the Republican -dominated Federal Government kept requiring more of the southern states which continued to cripple them financially. They also did not come through on many of their



Cited: Coldsmith, Don. "The Emporia Gazette." Jayhawkers and Border Ruffians. Emporia Gazette, 16 Mar. 2009. Web. 06 May 2012. . Tamowieckyi, Scott. ""Between the Hawk and the Buzzard"" Dini Proquest. Dini.proquest.com/view/between-the-hawk-and-the-buzzard-pqid:1656156241/, 5 Apr. 2012. Web.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    The republicans took up 16 Northerns states and the democrats took up 14 southern states. However, Elections were always close because support for either party was close. States that are on the fence were the ones that determined the winning party are called “swing states.” During the civil war, the democrats offered state’s rights party, decentralization, and limited government, winning the vote and gaining control over the White House. The Republicans were based on reconstruction and fought for civil rights, a national government, and wanted high tariffs. After the civil war, the Democratic party and the…

    • 1461 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ethnics of Sherman's March

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Kennett, Lee B. "Hell or High Old Times." America 's Civil War Vol. 17, Issue 6 (2005). EBSCO Host. 19 Feb. 2005.…

    • 1308 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Historians have argued inconclusively for years over the prime reason for Confederate defeat in the Civil War. The book Why the North Won the Civil War outlines five of the most agreed upon causes of Southern defeat, each written by a highly esteemed American historian. The author of each essay does acknowledge and discuss the views of the other authors. However, each author also goes on to explain their botheration and disagreement with their opposition. The purpose of this essay is to summarize each of the five arguments presented by Richard N. Current, T. Harry Williams, Norman A. Graebner, David Herbert Donald, and David M. Potter. Each author gives his insight on one of the following five reasons: economic, military, diplomatic, social, and political, respectively.…

    • 1300 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Rogers, William W., and Robert D. Ward, Leah R. Atkins, and Wayne Flynt. Alabama: The History of a Deep South State. Tuscaloosa: The University of Alabama Press, 1994.…

    • 5055 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    they our losing power within the government because loss of their voted Representatives and they had people like Bullock coming in as governor. They felt these people as people who betrayed them and were considered the lowest of the low and stood right next to the swagglewags and carpetbaggers. This led to many different states in rejection of the 14th amendment and to stay strong as a whole to protect those who stood with them prewar time as their Representatives. They didn’t believe that one should lose their job or the ranks by the hand of the Republicans trying to take control of the…

    • 1049 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Native Guard Essay

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages

    of the Confederacy in the Civil War. The metaphor focuses on the comparison between a…

    • 1550 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Dbq Era Of Good Feelings

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The North predominantly relied on trade and mercantilist profit making, whereas the South depended on labor-intense plantation industries that mostly required use of slavery. As the borderline states became the hotbed of slavery debate, the North and the South attempted to reach consent by Missouri Compromise, which is quintessential evidence that depicts the conflict on the practice of slavery. After Missouri was denied from joining the union because of its headstrong persistence on keeping slavery, the North and the South were able to reach a compromise that first accepted Maine to the union as a free state and then accepting Missouri as a slave state. The compromise not only ended up with a geographical line of 33'30'' that dissected the union but also signified the intensifying sectionalism ((F)). Even if Missouri Compromise was able to bring forth a temporary loosening of tension, it was rather an evanescent remedy of sectionalism that only foreshadowed the worsening conflict between the two parts of the…

    • 943 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After securing Atlanta for the Union General Sherman had orders to destroy Confederate General Hood’s army, “Sherman left a corps to hold Atlanta and pursued Hood with the rest of his army” (McPherson 808). Eventually Sherman got tired of chasing Hood and wanted to “ignore Hood and march through the heart of Georgia to the coast” (McPherson 808). “I could cut a swath through to the sea, he assured Grant, divide the Confederacy in two, and come up on…

    • 634 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The original seceding states of the Confederacy consisted of Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida, and Alabama. The people of these states saw themselves extremely different than that of the northern states both politically and culturally, and felt continuous pressure from the population dominating in the northern states to conform to northern ideals. It seemed the only and best option to keep the southern way of life was to become an independent Confederate nation. That idea to become a separate nation was not a sudden idea when Lincoln came into office; it was simply not recognized by previous presidents, which would allow for the issue to hit its climax when he was elected. By the time Lincoln came into office, talks of revolution were already at its tipping point, but as stated by Lincoln, “Both parties deprecated war, but one of them would make war rather than let the nation survive, and the other would accept war rather than let it perish. And the war came.” Feeling sympathy and the same operation as the seceding states Virginia, North Carolina,…

    • 1651 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many of their towns and supplies had been destroyed as a war strategy from the North to ensure that they would win the war. During Reconstruction, the south was in control under the North's hand. They had to do whatever the North said in order to return into the Union. The south was pissed with the fact that they had to fix what the north had done to them during the war and that they have to follow military reconstruction in order to re-enter into the Union. And without the help of any slaves to help them fix this mess, Southerners would try other ways to show the Union that they won't follow their laws and they’ll keep their southern ideals as shown in Document A with a loop-hole in the 13th amendment. “ Section 1. Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.” When Southerners had realised that they could technically make black people do their work again if they place them under arrest for any crime, that's when they started to specifically arrest black people for the littlest of crimes like having children out of wedlock and even walking along empty railroad tracks. This lead to the terrible process of convict leasing, which is technically…

    • 857 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    This book follows differing social structures within The Confederate States of America and how those clashing cultures led to multiple changes of strategy in the mountain regions of the Confederacy. All of these combined factors led to multiple tragic events within the Confederacy. The main social groups that are discussed in the book are Rural and Urban Confederates, Confederate Mountaineers, and Unionist. It is important to understand each of the different social groups before a full social analysis can be conducted. Once the social aspect of the mountain regions is understood, the specific strategies used by both the Union and the Confederacy can be discussed.…

    • 1897 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the spring of 1889, would be settlers, filled camps at the border towns of Arkansas City and Caldwell, Kansas. These camps came to be called the “Boomer Camps.” It was all the U.S. troops could do to restrain the people. From the south, long lines of wagons from Texas wound their way up directly to the south line of the Unassigned Lands at Purcell in the Chickasaw Nation. On the east side they lined the Canadian River. On the West, clusters of drought-stricken families from the Texas Panhandle flooded near the boundary near Fort Reno and west of Kingfisher stage station.…

    • 808 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sherman's march to the Sea

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages

    . . . this differs from European wars in this particular: we are not only fighting hostile armies, but a hostile people, and must make old and young, rich and poor, feel the hard hand of war, as well as their organized armies. I know that this recent movement of mine through Georgia has had a wonderful effect in this respect. Thousands who had been deceived by their lying newspapers to believe that we were being whipped all the time now realize the truth, and have no appetite for a repetition of the same experience. To be sure, Jeff. Davis has his people under pretty good discipline, but I think faith in him is much shaken in Georgia, and before we have done with her South Carolina will not be quite…

    • 1379 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Hollitz Essay

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Although Bailey does make an attempt to convey the overall mess that was the Republican government of the South, leaving no party blameless, I cannot help but feel that he carried through an undertone that would suggest that the Southern states were thrown to the wolves left to fend for themselves against their opposition from all sides. Whether it be their once public enemy, the Northerners who would present as manipulators whose sole objective was to exploit the Southern destruction for their own personal gain, the ignorant Negroes who couldn’t tell up from down, or the traitorous Southern scalawags who would leave behind their Southern brethren exchange for their stake in the power game, Bailey presents a sad and impossible state of affairs for the suffering whites of the South. Try as he may to deliver an unbiased explanation of the time, Bailey’s tone gives an overall negative opinion of the “carpetbaggers” and “scalawags.”…

    • 574 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Every major war in history has two things in common: a winner and a loser. There are many factors of war that decide the winner and the loser, some going unnoticed. The geography of a war has an impacting affect on the war and is sometimes overlooked, often leading to one side's downfall (Falls 5). Appalachia has a fluctuating geography, for it ranges from eroded down, plain-like areas, to mountains areas of up to almost 7000 feet (“The Appalachians”). The Civil War had many battles located in Appalachia, an area stretching from southern parts of New York, all the way down to northern Alabama, Georgia, and Mississippi(“The Appalachians”). Appalachian geography was home to many battlefields of the Civil War, but could this geography actually have had an overall impact?…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays