In his documentary “Fahrenheit 9/11”, the film maker Michael Moor explains his recognition to revealing the various deceptions made by George W Bush. Resulting from the 9/11 attack, George W. Bush used this event for his own personal gain, and advantage in foriegn affairs. As a result of the 9/11 attack, George W. Bush abuses this major event for the scam of money, power, and war.…
"Fahrenheit 9/11" is a chilling documentary made by Michael Moore that gives us a glimpse of what went on behind the World Trade Center attacks. This documentary is very well made, it sets the right tone for each scene and Moore is good at making his point. For example, in the opening scene, Condoleezza and other cabinet members are shown primping prior to being on TV. This shows the fact that they are more concerned about their exterior image and act, not necessarily concerned with doing the right thing. When Moore first portrays the attacks, he does not show the planes hitting the towers like every news channel. Moore, however, shows the screen completely black - proving that the sounds are all we need to distinguish that tragic day. In this documentary, Bush is linked to the Bin Laden family and companies that have done well since the World Trade Center attacks. Moore poses a lot of rhetorical questions throughout the documentary to make us think further.…
When considering the activist role of the media, the __________ of reporters, producers, and news…
The Biased viewpoint of Michael Moore tears viewers away from the actual problem, and perhaps even the film’s intended message itself……
In response to that Michael Moore, a controversial filmmaker, has made Fahrenheit 9/11, a kind of attack on Bush and his administration for their handling of both the "war on terrorism" and the war in Iraq.…
“In feature films the director is God; in documentary films God is the director.”(web quotes) This quote by Alfred Hitchcock contains some truth, but in past decades the documentary genre has become more than just factual information about real people and places. It has become a mode for opinion and bias. In Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 9/11, the “creative use of actuality” (film ed. Grierson) in its editing, style and source information all serve Moore’s argument and thus the directors view.…
In order to do this we will compare and contrast Michael Moore’s film “Fahrenheit 9/11” and Dylan Avery’s “Loose Change 9/11: An American Coup”. Not only will the style and elements of these documentaries be analyzed, but the content and meaning will be discussed as well. Both documentaries use the…
In this short essay about violence in television and video games it starts off talking about a very popular TV show at one point the sopranos. the author then goes on to talk about how in one of the episodes of sopranos Tony television and video games it starts off talking about a very popular TV show at one point the sopranos. the author then goes on to talk about how in one of the episodes of sopranos Tony Soprano murders one of his associates and dismembers the body and dumped the body parts. then the author talks about a few months later to brothers where caught for strangling and cutting her head and hands off and the only reason they were caught is because…
Throughout the article Michael Moore tries to convince the readers, that the threat by terrorists isn’t the real problem and it’s blown out of proportions by the Bush administration. He points out, that Americans rarely are targets for international terrorist attacks and the risk of being killed in a terrorist attack on American soil, the following years after the 9/11, were zero. Statistically the risk of dying from pneumonia, suicide, homicide or car-accidents is higher than dying from a terrorist attack. He says that the American people have been pounded with the belief of being scared by the terrorist attacks, which has escalated and gone beyond common sense.…
The effect that the media has on voters can be extremely diverse. From entirely formulating an opinion to strengthening an existing one, the media has the ability to do both but not to every type of individual. In order to understand how various citizens are influenced by media messages, Philip Converse et al. (1966) separated voters into three distinct groups: those with the highest levels of political awareness and understanding, those with the lowest levels and those of moderate understanding. In alignment with this, Graber (1984) theorised that a voter’s predispositions are the vital determinant when examining how effectively the media’s messages can sway opinions. It is therefore voters’ prior knowledge and understanding of political happenings that formulates the foundation for their decisions and thus their naivety of such happenings that allows them to be swayed by media messages.…
Michael Moore's latest film, "Fahrenheit 9/11," presents a critical look at the administration of George W. Bush and the War on Terrorism. In this film Moore investigates the rapid growth of the United States government and its trend of trampling the rights of individuals, and the corporatism that is spawned out of the close ties between big government and big business during wartime. Michael Moore may not convince all audiences, but is successful for its factual accuracy in which the evidence spoke for itself, and at the same time proclaimed Moore's artistry in transposing and splicing scenes to create impressions that supported his allegations and opinions. Michael Moore has employed two main techniques in an attempt to successfully influence his audience; psychological means of strategy, and cinematic techniques of persuasion. These methods, coupled with how they are presented to the audience, and how the audience react, are what Moore uses to create a scheming effect.…
George Orwell’s novel “1984” is truly a masterpiece that continues influencing many people around the world and has a deserved title of best-seller. The novel presents a nightmare vision of the repressive state control in Oceania. Although written in the middle of the last century, this story is nevertheless relevant today to the politics of state as it has never been before. This book teaches us not only the important lessons of the past, but also presents the essential ideas about spread of totalitarian regimes and how it can be easily achieved in the state-run societies.…
The manipulation of the media during war times has been used for many years. In most cases during times of war, or uncertainty people get a sense of patriotism and want to support the cause any way possible. This sense of patriotism is channeled strategically with the manipulation of the media. Douglas Kellner proves this in his work called, “9/11, spectacles of terror, and media manipulation(Kellner).” In this piece Kellner shows how both the Jihadist and the Bush Administration manipulated the media to portray their enemy. The Jihadist used social media and the internet to recruit and gain support they did this by portraying the western world as terrible sinful people. The Bush administration used the events of 9/11 unite the country against terrorist with the use of the global news. According to Kellner, Bush used the internet as well as popular media outlets to influence the US and the rest of the world to push his political agenda. Kellner’s overarching theme of his article was, the media is manipulated in times of war to gain support of the public people(Kellner). April Eisman dives deeper into the media that surround 9/11, in her article “The media of manipulation: patriotism and propaganda – mainstream news in the United States in the weeks following September 11(Eisman).” In Eisman makes a strong claim when she argues that the emotional media influenced how America reacted to the 9/11 terrorist attack. When the…
Eisman, A. (2003). The media of manipulation: patriotism and propaganda – mainstream news in the United States in the weeks following September 11. Critical Quarterly, 45(1/2), 55.…
Do today’s media hold a biased opinion? Political figure heads of modern day America have argued the subject of a biased liberal media for decades. The notion of the media being predominantly liberal is not unheard of because since publicly broadcasted news media first became common, the Republican Party was not yet one to rival the Democrats. The core argument presented is the possibility of a liberal media manipulating the American public and thus influencing them to vote in congruence with the ways of the Democratic political party. Thus far it is simple to see the media clearly holds a bias that is in favor of the liberal viewpoint. I believe the media should not hold an opinion because, it comes through in their coverage and thus influences some of the American public to vote in a way in which they would not have otherwise.…