According to some business historians, "business leaders were not predatory money seekers. Indeed, in many cases they were talented individuals whose creative contributions to the economy - and to American society as a whole - were very great." Allan Nelvins said that "it was true that Rockefeller used methods that were of dubious moral character. On the other hand the kind of monopoly control attained by Standard Oil was a natural response to the anarchical cutthroat competition of the period and reflected the trend in all industrial nations toward consolidation. To Nelvins Rockefeller was not a robber baron; he was a great innovator who imposed upon American industry 'a more rational and efficient pattern.' Rockefeller's objective was not merely the accumulation of wealth; he and others like him were motivated by 'competitive achievement, self-expression, and the imposition of their wills on a given environment'" (The American Businessman: Industrial Innovator or Robber Baron, pg. 34). These men came into a disorganized economy and created organizations that played a vital role in making American the greatest industrial power in the world. If it were not for the advancements in steel, oil, textiles, chemicals, electricity, and automotive vehicles, our nation would not be where it stands…
ruthless means. The definition of a Captain of Industry is a business leader whose means of…
Andrew Carnegie and John D. Rockefeller, were both at one point in there life’s the richest men in the world. However they both had very different trails getting to their fortunes. Rockefeller was more or less handed money being part of the prestige aristocracy, however he was a very shred and organized man. He stressed the idea of planning ahead and never procrastinating, in most cases he was a penny-pinching millionaire. Even as a child he was always very organized and always planned ahead. This helped contribute to his success in his life with is Oil Company. Andrew Carnegie was not as fortunate as Rockefeller; he was an Irish Immigrant and at one point in his life was making a $1.70 a week. He was the epitome of the American dream; he rose…
American Colossus is a book focusing on the Triumph of Capitalism from 1865 to 1900. The main idea that Brands is trying to communicate to readers is “during the decades after the civil war, Morgan and his fellow capitalists effected a stunning transformation in American life. They turned a society rooted in the soil into one based in cities. They lifted the standard of living of ordinary people to a plane associated, not long before in America and for decades after elsewhere, with aristocracy. They drew legions of souls from foreign countries to American shores. They established the basis for the projection of American economic and military power to the farthest corners of the planet.”…
But What carnegie, rockefeller, and morgan did was they made libraries and hospitals. If you think about the immigrants and the natives are all illiterate to by building these library it was not to give better opportunities to the immigrants it was to put their names on another building. I think that it is a nasty circle of corruption because the robber barons would work these people day and night and choose to make things like hospitals which because they are on such low wages and don’t get reimbursement for injuries suffered at the job they could never afford to get them medical care. So all the “ good things” that these robber barons built they were just another building to put there name…
At the end of the Civil War in 1865, America found itself in a state of economic chaos. As it experienced a second Industrial Revolution after the Civil War, the United States emerged as an industrial colossus and world power. While capitalists undeniably facilitated America’s industrial and economic development between 1875 and 1900, the intention with which they did so has been a topic of dispute. While some historians described these capitalists as “captains of industry” others believed they were better described as “robber barons”. Of these two characterizations, the title of “robber barons” was more appropriate as most of them gained their wealth and power by fraudulent means — defying government regulation, using ruthless business schemes…
Cited: "The American Experience | Andrew Carnegie | Gilded Age" PBS, 1999. Web. 23 July 2009. .…
The recent hurricanes, Katrina and Rita, along with global warming amplify Jared Diamond's thesis in "The Last Americans" that humans are responsible for the downfall of civilizations. Throughout history, many civilizations have collapsed due to numerous reasons such as incompetent leaders and environmental negligence. Many people view the United States' current environmental crisis with apathy. These people feel that the environmental collapse of ancient societies such as the Mayans is only pertinent to the present day decline of distant countries such as Somalia and Afghanistan; but in fact the United States is being equally affected. Diamond suggests that the future of the country lies in our hands and not in some intangible force that surrounds us.…
People were given places to stay and freedom from supression, freedom from their overbearing government's. At first there were plenty of German and Scandinavian immigrants, however, the Gilded Age saw newcomers including Italians, Baltic, Slavic, and Chinese people. They were able to hope that they too could be a captain or at least be of assistance to their families and get that American Dream Carnegie, Rockefeller, J.P. Morgan, and Vanderbilt had. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, in 1889 concluded that it would be immoral for the men to hoard riches to themselves Furthermore recalling that, “his judgement, is best calculated to produced the most beneficial results for the community” (Document C). Carnegie was capable of placing his money where his mouth was and donated a total of $350 million. If he was really such a vile, corrupt, shrewd being he would not have made any contribution to society. The world's richest man used his money he accumulated in an exemplary way, to assist the growth for knowledge by donating to universities, and public…
Modern America can be considered one of the world's economic and industrial leaders. This didn't happen instantaneously. It was a long process that took centuries to occur from when America was first colonized by England. America started slow and far behind England and other European countries in the technology race but a diverse culture and the work ethic of American people all helped to push this country forward. From antebellum America in the 19th century, to the Progressive Era in the late 19th century and early 20th century, and finally to the New Deal period in the 20th century, many changes occurred as millions of people lives were affected greatly during this time. Throughout these eras in U.S. history, there was a general improvement in the lives of most Americans from the progression of economic life.…
Even in the early infancy of America, it is evident that it’s people desired to expand and grow their tiny nation. The New World held so many opportunities for the foreign people with its abundance of land. Though the prosperity of expansion was a major factor, moving into the unexplored land was a cause for most of the countries battles. But, the people’s craving for land was insatiable once they started to branch out. Land was power, and the more you had the better off you’d be in terms of foreign affairs and in the wellbeing of your nation economically.…
"Miami no es los Estados Unidos" (Miami is not the United States) is a phrase that I heard many times while growing up in Miami. It is problematic, because at its core lies the idea that a city that is teeming with Latinx/Hispanic immigrants could not be representative of what the United States "really" is. An idea that is pervasive but that unnecessarily emphasizes the vibrant culture of Miami, and underplays the socioeconomic inequality that exists in many other cities. As an immigrant I have grown up as a part of communities that are often considered under-served, and that consistently struggled financially. Something that I was aware of from a young age, and that truly shaped the way I looked at my future. With every time that my mom woke…
In Dave Barry’s, “Lost in America”, I feel the narrator was not only expressing his regret for having missed the signs of how deep his mother’s grief ran but, also for a chance to relive those final memories with her as a way of making it seem as she is still alive, even if only for a moment. I also feel he intended for his words to act as a warning to others to watch their own loved ones for signs of depression, especially someone who has gone through a tragedy like Dave’s mother. His mother’s inability to move on or make a commitment to anything after her husbands death were all signs of a deep depression hers sons missed, probably due to their own grief. She was silently telling them she needed help in different ways, unfortunately Dave and his…
The Andy Griffith show was a situational family comedy created by Sheldon Leonard and Aaron Ruben that ran from 1960-1968. The show was quite popular and successful in its eight years of air time. Episode one of season one was written by Charles Stewart and Jack Elinson. The Andy Griffith Show portrayed many different themes in the very first episode. Some themes demonstrated focused on loss, acceptance, and non-traditional family, embracing the future, childhood honesty, loyalty, and fear of change. The main theme that really stuck out to me was the fear of change. In my eyes, it is what supported the purpose of the whole episode and immediately gave viewers something to relate to.…
Many revolutions have classified time periods in history, yet none have been as ruthless as the American industrial revolution. The American nation was switching its interests from its agrarian roots to a more modernized attraction to technology and industry. A group of men stepped forth from the masses to lay claim to the many facets of this changing world. They became leaders of their own fields of business, providing the driving force behind economic and industrial change. The leaders of this revolution formed alliances with one another, so that the manufacturing power lay in the hands of a few wealthy businessmen. Even though some of these "kings" of the market came from meager beginnings, they built up their empires, acquiring more riches than the average man could possibly imagine. They used their enormous amounts of wealth for many causes, few of them honorable. There were numerous times when high-ranking officials in the government were "bought", thus allowing these moguls to take advantage of the nation, while the government turned a blind eye. Their work ethics also lacked moral fiber. Many times smaller businesses, which might one day provide a threat, were run into the ground. As well as hurting the principles of the nation and the American economy, the industrial magnates damaged hope and dreams of the American public. The workers in the companies were shown appalling treatment, receiving little pay and no benefits. Through their fraudulently deceitful dealings, these men stole from the government, the people and the culture of America. The industrial leaders of the late 19th century were true robber barons.…