Preview

The Meno

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
787 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Meno
"If I do not know what something is, how could I know what qualities it possesses?" (Socrates) this idea presented to Meno creates the foundation for what is called Meno’s Paradox. This paradox evaluates the question of how are we to find things in the universe if we cannot know where to begin to look? And if we know where to look for the answer then why are we looking? Socrates, however, challenges Meno’s idea by saying that we may not know all things but we know some and by using deductive reasoning we are able to find such answers. This creates the idea that all knowledge is premeditated, “…a process men call learning- discovering…are as a whole recollection” (Socrates).
Socrates refers to virtue as the soul, he states that by listening to priests and priestess saying that the soul can be reborn and the physical body can die but the soul cannot “they say…the human soul is immortal…” (Socrates). He then proceeds to say that because the soul does not die “…it has seen all things…” (Socrates). The allowance of the soul to be able to see everything allows the soul to “know”, therefore, we do not learn we only recall. By being able to recall what our soul already knows we only need to remember. Socrates explains this when he lays out the mathematics problem for the servant boy.
The servant boy is the perfect way for Socrates to prove his theory; the boy had no prior schooling. As Socrates shows the boy the square and asks him questions Socrates does not tell the boy the answer. He allows the boy to use his own reasoning skills to come to the conclusion. Socrates points out later “…I am not teaching the boy…all I do is ask questions…” (Socrates). This leads to the conclusion that the boy was allowed to think and use his own common knowledge and deductive reasoning skills to declare what his answers were. He was correct every time Socrates asked a question leading to the conclusion that he must have known how to understand and solve the problems before he was

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Socrates does not in fact tell his associates anything, but rather helps them understand ideas that were already in them through his series of questions that test whether what his associate says is of truth or not, and so he is not actually giving any knowledge. In the Meno, he shows an example of what he does when he attempts to “bring forth” geometry knowledge from a Greek slave boy. The boy answers some questions incorrectly at first before stating that he does not know. Socrates then continues to ask the boy more questions, and as the boy answers them, he comes to understand it without Socrates ever actually telling the boy anything at all. Socrates then states that “Then he will have knowledge without being taught by anyone but only questioned, since he will have recovered the knowledge from inside himself” (Meno, 85c-85d). He is saying that the boy is able to gain knowledge from Socrates asking him multiple questions about it constantly, and it will come forth within his associates, without him actually telling them anything at all. He also elaborates on this type of wisdom that he has in the Apology, saying “I thought this man seemed wise to many people, and especially to himself, but wasn’t. Then I tried to show him that he thought himself wise, but wasn’t.” (Apology, 21c-21e). Here, Socrates is stating that he has no knowledge, but rather questions the ideas of his associates to help them become more wise. This also showcases the type of wisdom that he does possess, which is knowing that he does not know…

    • 984 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Meno Paradox Analysis

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Meno Paradox starts around page 79, in these pages Meno and Socrates argue about weather knowledge is learnable or merely a recollection. Lets start by reading the “Meno Paradox”. Meno says, “How will you look for it, Socrates, when you don’t know what it is? How will you aim to search for something you do not know at all? If you should meet with it, how will you know what to look for?”(80d) My interpretation of the text is this, if you know the answer to a question you cannot gain knowledge by asking it. But if you do not know the answer to the question, you will not differentiate the correct answer when given. How can I ever truly know if something is true or false? If I could just keep going to the source of the previous answer and question weather that source is true or false? One might respond by…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Plato's Cave on Ignorance

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Freeing from the psychological prison we create by continuously depending on what we see and understand to be true realities can be achieved in learning and logical reasoning. “Will he not fancy that the shadows which he formerly saw are truer than the objects which are now shown to him?” (Socrates 19). Demonstrated in this quote, is the beginning stage of acceptance and awareness; hesitation. This growing open-minded approach to unfamiliar situations is required in order to leave behind our old and ignorant ways. Socrates suggests to the reader that preparation for the real world and a need to pursue truths through the use of education will serve as guidance down more desirable life paths. He also introduces the idea of the immense responsibility those who have been fortunate enough to access higher education have to provide leadership and improvement in society. But, with the power of wisdom, comes ridicule and seclusion due to the ignorance prevalent in a population that prefers to live with their minds trapped inside the cave.…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Interlocutor Vs Meno

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages

    After observing the unchangeable nature of Meno, Socrates uses his last attempt to differentiate between true knowledge and right opinion, which can lead to similar action and outcomes. His vital note is that right opinion is easy to lose, but true knowledge can be recollected at any time. A person can listen to another's teaching without pondering and assume that he knows the knowledge behind it, while he only possesses transient right opinion, like Meno's receipt of Gorgias's ideas. However, he will never grasp the real knowledge, which will encompass all specific situations and stay within an industrious, pensive, and open…

    • 1706 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    After all this, Socrates goes on to the story about a man returning from the afterlife and describing it. At the end of the story, he says that because he and his companions have established that the soul is immortal, and because this story speaks about the immortality of the soul, it is even more important for people to be just and seek good and true knowledge in their life. This, in turn, will bring them much happiness in both this life and the…

    • 627 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Unit 1 Psychology Notes

    • 3522 Words
    • 15 Pages

    9. Aristotle – believed the opposite of Socrates and Plato; Plato’s student, believed that we get knowledge through observing our world…

    • 3522 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno's Geometric Argument

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages

    In the Meno, Socrates tries to walk Meno through the discovery of if virtue can be taught. Along the way they come across the theory that if virtue can be taught then it is knowledge. If knowledge then it can be taught but the Geometric argument was brought up where a person can have the capacity to learn based on their previous life and their soul conjuring up prior knowledge to understand the topic. Socrates called upon a slave, a person who has no formal education and walked him through a geometry problem. This problem was meant to illustrate that a person’s knowledge is not based on what this person has learned in their lifetime but their capacity and ability to understand is based on what their soul has learned in previous lifetimes. Socrates uses this example show his thesis is true but what about different scenarios that aren’t math based and through different problems you can see that Socrates theory is half correct and that there are several implications that prove that souls don’t know it all.…

    • 1538 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno Paradox

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Meno has progressed because he has come to some new level of understanding just by admitting he doesn’t know the answers to virtue and being willing to seek out those answers by asking them of someone who does know the answers, Socrates. Socrates doesn’t see this as enough. He considers Meno to be like the slave boy, someone who has opinions that are a compilation of other peoples’ ideas, Gorgias and Socrates, but have yet to be anything of value because these ideas aren’t his own. It is not enough to just want to know the answers if Meno isn’t willing to investigate on his own. Just as the slave boy would become an expert at geometry “if he were repeatedly asked these same questions in various ways” because he will have practiced many different variations of the same concept and will gain true understanding, Meno will only come to claim true understanding by taking the ideas of Gorgias and Socrates and making them his own by practicing his own…

    • 1450 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    “[Having] been reduced to the perplexity of realizing that he did not know… he will go on and discover something.” (Meno 84a-d, Lamb translation). He is stating here how the once “ know it all's” are now going to discover new things because now they know they don’t know everything. Socrates believed this was a way everyone should live. “Life without this sort of examination is not worth living.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??). “Socrates modeled the ultimate peace within aporia in his confrontation with death, maintaining his curiosity and seriousness, his awe and levity.”(Aporia and the wisdom of emptiness, Socrates pg??) He did his best while speaking to these people that he kept the conversation serious using what he was wondering and lighting the conversation up a bit with his…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Introduction: In Meno, Socrates insists that what we learn is just recollection. Socrates and Meno begin to discuss what virtue is and from then they move on to talk about what Socrates concept of recollection is. Socrates brings up an example about a slave boy in which he gives him a geometry problem to solve, without any knowledge. Socrates, then tries to prove his paradox to be true.…

    • 699 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    What exacty is virtue and how does one describe it? In the dialog Meno, two men, Meno and Socrates, attempt to define virtue. The dialog begins with Meno asking Socrates if virtue can be taught. Personally, I do not imagine that virtue can be taught. Meno does not exactly know what virtue is but guesses that it is to possess power and to retain good things. Socrates argues that learning is impossible because a soul has already learned everything from passed lives and that learning is simply recollection from those past lives. The purpose of this paper is to discuss Meno’s paradox and to determine how Socrates resolves it.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Meno

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “As to my being a torpedo, if the torpedo is torpid as well as the cause of torpidity in others, then indeed I am a torpedo, but not otherwise; for I perplex others, not because I am clear, but because I am utterly perplexed myself. And now I know not what virtue is, and you seem to be in the same case, although you did once perhaps know before you touched me. However, I have no objection to join with you in the enquiry” (Meno 80d).…

    • 988 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    His knowledge is always in question, but if learning develops knowledge then technically both are in comparison and shape one another. In The Meno the learning that Socrates faces comes through memory and how the soul rediscovers the truth. This learning that Socrates overcomes can be taught and is put in a specific conclusion with factual evidence. This information in learning is the most confident Socrates gets, therefore this is the next step to discover knowledge. But Socrates does not confirm this or give a solid reason as to why the meaning of knowledge is important.…

    • 1551 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socrates Vs Meno Analysis

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    I completely deny his theory and what I believe Socrates have shown in his example is that he simply directed the boy towards the right answer. In one instance, Socrates states, “ At first he did not know what the basic line of the eight-foot square was; even now he does not yet' know, but then he thought he knew, and answered confidently as if he did know, and he did not think himself at a loss, but now he does think b himself at a loss, and as he does not know, neither does he think he knows”(plato page 11). This example shows that the boy gave wrong answer several times, but Socrates simply points out where he has gone wrong, and then the boy starts over until he finally is lead to the right answer. If a person is directed or guided towards an answer, it doesn’t show that the person is recollecting past knowledge. What the example provided by Socrates portray is that the boy was able to figure out the correct answer after he has been given several other facts about the problem. This essentially means that the boy was using his reasoning skills to provide a correct…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The learning paradox in the Meno describes the problem that a person cannot inquire about what they know or don’t know, because if they know they do not need to ask and if they do not know then they do not know what to ask for. For example, if you are trying to discover what a person looks like, how can you know you’ve found them if you don’t already know what they look like? As I will discuss later on, there are very few contexts in which the learning paradox is valid, this being one of them. The learning paradox was used by Socrates to try and prove innatism, that everything is inside us and has to be brought out. The idea of innatism and learning as recollection all tie together into the main theme…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays