A) Characterize Marais Van der Vyver Marais Van der Vyver is an afrikaner farmer, living in South Africa during the end of the apartheit regime. Furthermore he has title as the regional Party leader and commandant of the local security command. The people from his district remember how he as child was rather shy and withdrawn, and it seems that the people around him beleives that he has conserved these personality traits as an adult. Nevertheless he exposes his feelings at the police station when repporting the hunting mishap, where he accidently shoots one of his black farm labours. He sobbs and weeps, and the captain of the police office is ashamed of this sudden breakdown of Marais Van der Vyver. Marais has three kids with his whife; Magnus, Helena and Karel. But in the last lines of the story it’s revealed that the black labourer he accidently shot to death isn’t his boy, but his actual son. This boy’s name is Lucas.
B1) What is the theme of the story? The theme of the story is quite complexed as it both deals with the racism issues which unfolded in the incredebly segregated society of South Africa, and at the same time shows how complicated and paradoxical this separation of black and white people is. This appears in the text as Lucas turns out to be the result of Marais’ extramarital relations, and as Lucas dies caused by his father, the whole affair becomes a personal tragedy for Marais Van der Vyver. But Marais knowns by himself that the story of this hunting mishap in the eyes of the opposition overtly is a callous act of negligent shooting and a perfect example of the still opressed blacks of South Africa.
B2) What is the message of the story? The message of this text could be one shouldn’t judge a case by its superficial appearance, because often it turns that the case have many different aspects which ought to be taken in consideration. For example the immediate impression of the hunting mishap easiest takes the side of the opposition’s opinions, as this very accident fits perfectly into their picture of South Africa and of an afrikaner farmer as a inconsiderate human being. In this case, the opposition is wrong. Besides, although sex between blacks and whites has been legalized, it’s impossible for our main character to stand up and tell the truth, because there still is plenty of unwritten norms and rules stuck from the time of apartheid. At that moment it’s still a taboo to have extramarital affairs, not to mention babies, with a person of the opposite skin color.
B3) Why did Nadine Gordimer write this story? It’s imaginable that Nadine Gordimer, who was a clear opponent of the apartheid regime, has written this story to invite South Africans on both sides of the segregated society to remove their prejudices against each other and learn to tolerate each other’s different worlds. Plus to depict the South Africans’ part self-created fears – the white people who live in the fear of being misunderstood, and for attacks – and the black people in fear for being subjected to racism or oppression.
C) Why is the story called” The Moment before the Gun Went Off”? The moment before the gun went off is shown in the story as a moment of high excitement between the boy Lucas, and his father. Marais taught Lucas to maintain tractors and other farm machinery, and he took him hunting. So overall they have a good relationship with each other, despites the fact that Lucas is a product of Marais Van der Vyver’s extramarital relations, despite that he can only be a son in secret. Therefore, the death of the son Lucas becomes paradoxical because he is both a burden and a joy both dead and alive.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
It is hard to tell what the future holds in respect to the justice system since it is not often determined by one’s intentions, but the events people encounter as they purse their goals. Therefore, the decision of this case may affect a criminal justice professional I the sense he or she might want to maintain a strong and focused philosophy. This may involve the consideration of both crime control and due process models when dealing with some cases because the use of the two appears to be the best strategy to deal with crime in the…
- 548 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
This is a look at the landmark Ricci v. DeStefano case. We will look at the case itself, the cases that influenced it as the cases that have been influenced by it. We will also look at a few different views of what the decision means for the future.…
- 4124 Words
- 17 Pages
Best Essays -
Intimacy plays a key role in both Dillard and O’Brien’s works; it sucks the readers into story and locks their attention. In both works, building intimacy is primarily achieved through the use of personal anecdotes. Written in first person point of view, the anecdotes make us feel as if the author is next to us, trying to share the experience and feelings of an important moment in their life. Both TTTC and PATC are utterly books of anecdotes, and this extensive use of anecdotes keeps the readers involved. From TTTC, chapter “On the Rainy River”, O’Brien writes, “This is one story I’ve never told before. Not to anyone. Not to my parents, not to my brother or sister, not even to my wife.” The act of confession, and stating how he hasn’t told anyone rapidly elevates the status of the readers; from a mere “reader” to someone even closer to O’Brien than his own family.…
- 333 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
(d) The case: (12 marks) • What happened in this case? (1 mark) Summarise the facts. PLEASE BE CAREFUL NOT TO SIMPLY RE-WRITE OR RE-STATE THE FACTS. What is required is a BRIEF summary, in your own words. What was the decision in the case? (1 mark) Identify and explain the main legal issue or issues of the case in your own words. (10 marks) NOTE: this part of the question will require students to do some reading and to conduct some independent research beyond the case and beyond the prescribed textbook. Please see the attached Guidelines for this Assignment, as well as the Research Guidance Notes for Assignment 1 on Blackboard to help you with your research.) 3. Please include footnotes AND a bibliography (list of references at the end of your assignment). Please note footnotes and the bibliography will NOT be included in the word limit. NOTE: You should also refer to the Course Outline (section 4) regarding Assessment Format (paragraph 4.3), Assignment Submission Procedure (paragraph 4.4) and penalty for late submission (paragraph 4.5).…
- 969 Words
- 4 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“In reaching the verdict, the jurors reconsider both their understanding of the case and their understanding of themselves.” Discuss…
- 880 Words
- 26 Pages
Good Essays -
It is established that there are conflicting perspectives between past and present, with people of the present having a greater understanding of the implications of apartheid. However, some are still ignorant - shown when a woman tries to give a Springbok Jersey to a young African child. Another lady informs her “If he wears it, he will get beaten up. For them, Springbok still represents apartheid.” Within this scene, the director uses positioning to held audience understand tensions, and close ups to show the confusion on the woman’s face and the shock of the boy. This small scene is representative of how some white Africans are trying to reach out, but still do not understand the existing implications of…
- 947 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
What can be surprising in this text are the paradoxical elements. On one hand we have law men, from who we expect a strong interest in facts. But we can see that in the text they are not referring…
- 593 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
In order to examine the historical and political significance of this case, it is fundamental to review the political discourse of the period in conjunction with case facts, notes, and finally, the decision. This assists us in our understanding of this benchmark case in completeness.…
- 938 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
Critically analyse, explain and evaluate this statement in the light of recently decided case law and academic commentaries.…
- 2687 Words
- 11 Pages
Best Essays -
What makes this case standout is that it is such a high profile investigation, where Judicial Rhetoric is in used. Since it is fairly recent event not a ton of research has been done on this topic; which is partly why I chose it. Along with the fact that I’m generally curious about rhetoric used by lawyers.…
- 957 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
This case exemplifies how the…
- 813 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
cases. The information obtained from this article will be used to show how difficult it is to…
- 2427 Words
- 10 Pages
Good Essays -
In this assignment, we will attempt to utilize some of the concepts of legal writing that we will discuss in class. Below you will find an essay that, to put it mildly, needs a bit of work. The wording is verbose and uses “slang”. There is no focus or organization to the essay and the case citations are in the wrong places and in the incorrect format.…
- 523 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Two of the three factors in Grant support the movement of not excluding the evidence obtained through the officers in the search of Ms. Alomar. Firstly, the impact on the Charter-protected interest of the accused was not serious. Secondly, society is very interested in the adjudication of the case on its merits.…
- 797 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
21. ‘It is not always easy to distinguish the innocent from the guilty in situations of conflict.’…
- 1467 Words
- 6 Pages
Good Essays