Preview

The Moral Climate Safina Summary

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
652 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Moral Climate Safina Summary
The Moral Climate, is a magazine article written by Carl Safina and published by Orion Magazine. Safina opens his article boldly getting to the point by saying, “What most distresses me is the thirty years we’ve wasted by asking people to live sustainably.” (1). This statement refers to his disappointment with society, pertaining to the issues with our climate. How society has become blinded as to what is important. This article shoots for the attention of environmentalist and the ordinary public. The authors purpose is the grasp the reader’s attention by basically criticizing them, and nobody like to be criticized. This criticizing is an effective way to bring the reader in so they can see what is the purpose.
One major claim that Safina brought up was referring to our refusal to sacrifice. He states,
This refusal to “sacrifice” is actually a pathological refusal to change for the better. That is the real sacrifice. That refusal is framed and abetted by the disinformation campaigns of companies that would shrink if we realized we would be better off with less of them. Think of ExxonMobil; it’s probably the best example. Those companies’ fear of us — specifically that we might accept the consequences of reality — compels them into a rather successful effort to retain power over us by distorting our understanding of what’s real. (¶ 4).
…show more content…
He criticizes a major oil company by making seem like the bad guy. When in fact companies as such are well aware of the inefficiency of fossil fuels. The ExxonMobil company is far on way of giving back to the environment by experimenting with natural gases, that have shown less emissions of CO2. They also are creating ways to capture the carbon dioxide in the air and store it away safely. These vital facts were not included in within his article, which seem morally wrong to just discourage a company that’s trying to make a difference for the

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Is global warming a moral dilemma? Is it the public policy problem from hell? In "The Environmental Issue from Hell," Bill McKibben uses many of such phrases en route to arguing for a new approach to global warming. By discussing hell and morals, the reader’s mind is already equating it with two heavily debated issues. Therefore, we begin to question their existence and how we should deal with the subjects. McKibben wisely chooses these disputes to represent his main concerns: the ways in which consumerism affects the global ecosystem, and the impact of humans on the environment. McKibben presents a solution on how to handle each of these environmental issues, utilizing both the people and the government.…

    • 737 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Study

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages

    References: Johnson, K. & Cohen, A. (2000, January 1). Dilemma at Devil 's Den - Harvard Business Review. Harvard Business Review Case Studies, Articles, Books. Retrieved November 17, 2010, from http://hbr.org/product/dilemma-at-devil-s-den/an/BAB081-PDF-ENG…

    • 628 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    He tries to raise the awareness that things talked about in the past are still apparent now and actions need to be taken to solve the problems. He achieved both of these aims as he is being a critic of this situation and criticizes this issue with evidence and reasons.…

    • 795 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In Charles Dickens’s Book A Tale of Two Cities, he illustrates the French Revolution and its effect on the people. Through the stories of revolutionaries, upper-class, and lower-class citizens he creates a dichotomy between Paris, France, and London, England, to caution England about what will happen if their government continues to run as France’s does. Dickens uses imagery of the sea to warn that a hellacious government leads to an equally hellacious revolt.…

    • 2563 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    “The fact of the matter is that today, stuff-selling mega-corporations have a huge influence on our daily lives. And because of the competitive nature of our global economy, these corporations are generally only concerned with one thing…the bottom line. That is, maximizing profit, regardless of the social or environmental costs.” —David Suzuki…

    • 3580 Words
    • 15 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    it's common sense; we are causing a problem, and the only way not to mess up the future is to do the right things now to preserve our environment. At the same time I don't think Berry stays on topic about climate change. He jumps around a lot in this article so I think that the title could be changed to something that suits this article.…

    • 546 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Pollan’s article is well composed, he uses examples of current/past events and also practical examples of everyday tasks to show then cons and pros of going green and does not show where he stands until the end. In the beginning he leads on readers to think why even bother it is too late for whatever we may try to do. He suggest that people are just plain lazy and don’t want to change their lifestyles so makes it seem impossible to make a change, “Al Gore asks us to change the light bulbs because he probably can’t imagine us…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In order to build a sustainable society, we need to achieve a secure balance among the three value standards of “economy,” “people and society,” and “environment.” The first value standard of “economy” is primarily measured in monetary terms. Spectacular development of global economy in the latter half of the 20th century has greatly improved the living standard of many in the industrialized countries and some in the upper segment of developing countries from material and convenience points of view. However, this system has fostered an excessive and lavish consumption pattern in the U.S., Japan and other industrialized countries, casting substantially negative impact on the world’s sustainability and the true affluence of people and society. The second value standard of “people and society” is defined as all elements associated with our social life minus the “economy”. This domain, therefore, includes such elements as health, security, equity, welfare and culture. In an industrial society such as Japan, we place emphasis on money and goods, and often find ourselves out of touch from our families, communities, or with our inner selves, elements that comprise an important part of this value standard. The third value standard of “environment” is defined here as the total system of natural environment -- the basis of all life forms -- that surrounds the man-made social system. Needless to say, this is under a grave threat as resources are being depleted, deteriorated or permanently damaged. The environment may not serve as the value standard that directly dictates our current generation, but we need to reaffirm its importance for the…

    • 5738 Words
    • 16 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Satiric Essay

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The parallelism of the two passages show how contradictive both arguments are. In the beginning, the passages both share the commonality of name calling. The use of parallelism illustrates how a discussion of this topic is useless. If both sides of the argument are only coming up with statements to oppose each other, there can not be a clear victor. In this circumstance, parallelism serves to primarily illustrate the satirical lens of the argument. Both passages view the ultimate agenda of the environmentalist and the “brown- lasher;” both claiming that each other is after either capitalism, or governmental power. The obvious structure of the passages, also illustrate that there is an unsettling nature of environmentalist discussions. The divisions of the two topics into two separate passages show how people are contradictive. This also emphasizes on the parallelism of the two passages. Parallelism in the entirety of the passages exemplifies that the nature of such discussions are ridiculous and unproductive in nature.…

    • 393 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Companies are set up so that people judge each other on failure" leading to progress in society being hindered due to the pressures of expectations. This compares to the moment Orwell feels the crowd of Indians eagerly waiting for him to get flattened by the rabid elephant; making him alter his decisions so he doesn’t make a fool of…

    • 1376 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    We as humans have an important role to play when confronted with an issue which is in any way concerned with our relationship to nature. Although we coexist on this planet with numerous other species of life, ours is the only one whose decisions can potentially have a significant influence on the status quo of the delicate system that is Earth. Our attitudes and connections towards nature are important because they directly affect how we will realize the goal of sustainability. Nonetheless, in order to begin this task we must first ascertain what it is exactly that we are working with. The words ‘nature’ and ‘sustainability’ are often used but rarely defined, therefore an interdisciplinary approach is required to provide a working definition of these terms, because we will not know whether we have achieved our goal if we never truly understood what it was.…

    • 1804 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    The author's entire argument rests on the assumption that people actually care. The hot button issues that are introduced in the piece are multitier. Profits and financial effects may stir the interests of one person while the environmental and human components of needless food waste and starving people inspire another. That is why the way the authors structured the argument and employed the tactics they did is a brilliant device of appealing not only to those who may agree with all of their points, but it also resonates with those who may not share all of the concerns they…

    • 716 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Compare and Contrast

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Caring for and preserving the environment is an issue that gains interest daily. In the essays “How to Poison the Earth” by Linnea Saukko and “Chronicles of Ice” by Gretel Ehrlich both authors make excellent points about how to save and conserve the planet Earth. Ehrlich and Saukko go about making these points in two completely different ways though although they do have their similarities. Saukko uses a more sarcastic and ironic way to prove her point while Ehrlich uses a more serious and detailed way to prove hers.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This article talks about the benefits of both the environment and the people themselves. It…

    • 2129 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Environmentalism Is Bad?

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages

    An issue that is discussed involves the “bad” actions of environmentalists. Environmentalists always believe what they are doing helps the earth, but plenty of people from these “eco-friendly” groups use violence, vandalism and also interfere in business activity. This leads to many regular Americans upset. One would think that these groups of environmentalists would be the first people to want to stop these violent acts, because the whole environmental movement would be tarnished (Berlau 777). These horrible people are what we call “eco-terrorists” and they have drawn swastikas on Ronald McDonald, tried to blow up a ski resort and placed spikes in to trees in order to keep trees from being cut down but the person cutting them ended up getting hurt (Berlau 773-774, 778) Sadly enough, “some mainline environmental leaders have publicly said that eco-terrorism enables the green movement to pursue a good cop, bad cop approach to getting what it wants” (Berlau 777). Jensen and McMillan also agree that the environmentalist approach is not the best idea, simply through their comic strip. The two girls argue back and forth about what they can do in order to help the environment, but using the environmentalist approach will not change the earth because it is already destroyed. In fact, “the problem really is the whole system” (Jensen and…

    • 860 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays