The essays by Ambrose, Broyles, Hedges, Kudo, and Styron collectively discuss War in varying contexts, highlighting the effects both before and after war. Some articles intersect on the supporting the idea of another, while others clearly hold opposing views.…
War brings death and destruction, merciless slaughter and butchery, disease and starvation, poverty and ruin in its wake. Although war may not always be the first answer or the most beneficial, it is an inescapable evil because war has brought the world peace and prosperity while banding people together to fight for a cause. It leads to national growth and solves domestic problems between countries; Injustice and tyranny can be quelled as the aftereffect of war. On the contrary, war includes loss of human life, spreads of diseases, and induces a feeling of anxiety and dismay among communities. The brutal sacrifices that innocent people undergo may not be worth the outcome.…
War requires unity behind a cause and a war without a cause leads to chaos. In Going After Cacciato, Paul Berlin, a soldier is faced with the harsh reality of war in Vietnam and imagines his journey to Paris, a place that stands for peace and hope. The author, Tim O’Brien, depicts Paul Berlin’s ambivalent views—whether to stand by his obligation to serve his country, even when it leads to destruction or to follow his own values to gain a sense of his true intention of gaining a sense of tranquility in order to reveal that war divides our morals and no definitive purpose.…
In his book, Michael Howard describes what liberal thinkers have expressed about the entity of war in different periods in history. Chronologically, he has tried to persuade us with the teachings of Erasmus and Thomas Paine to Mazzini’s idea of nationalism and its effect on war, to Jeremy Bentham’s arguments all the way up to the twentieth century capturing the liberal thinker’s philosophy of Fascism and Communism.…
“The next dreadful thing to a battle lost is a battle won,” was once said by Duke of Wellington. Throughout history, many wars have occurred and have cause much change in the world. In the essay The Moral Equivalent of War, by William James, the same topic about war is discussed within the essay. However, William James, the author, seems like he does not approve the reasons and actions for many of the wars that have occurred. Furthermore, William seems to try to find reason and try to understand many points of view to go war. I would believe that William James would disagree with the quote because, even though he is a pacifist, he seems to try to find the reason behind going to war and knows that with winning a war, it continues to nourish a couple of human virtues.…
In today's world and society, war is often the last source of solution for perseverance and safekeeping of a democracy’s interests, while on the other…
“When people speak of great men, they think of men like Napoleon – men of violence. Rarely do they think of peaceful men. But contrast the reception they will receive when they return home from their battles. Napoleon will arrive in pomp and in power, a man who’s achieved the very summit of earthly ambition. And yet his dreams will be haunted by the oppressions of war. William Wilberforce, however, will return to his family, lay his head on his pillow and remember: the slave trade is no more.”…
* Not free market & not socialist – do they achieve this? Will this work?…
War impacts the world, our lives past, present, and future will be affected by war. When there are rumors of war, opposing divisions primarily between the philosophies of pacifism and just war will inevitably clash. Exploring the concepts of each philosophy is important because they convey the sentiments of all because, in the decision to war, it is either supported or opposed. This paper will attempt to explain pacifism and just war. Nonetheless, it is essential to consider that during peace it is difficult to feel the reality of war as well knowing any potential outcome had pacifism been practiced to a greater extent. Pacifism is relatively new movement and philosophy, unfortunately, it postdates war.…
The word “patriot” is often used with a positive connotation. It implies loyalty and a willingness to fight for one’s country and people. The image of the Fourth of July, flying flags, and military homecomings come to mind. But is patriotism virtuous? It may sound virtuous in theory but in reality, patriotism breeds immoral actions by creating a sense of superiority in minds of a nation’s citizenry.…
In this essay, I will be sharing my opinions in 3 different sections. Is it possible to avoid war? Is war in human nature? How would our world be different without some of the most important wars in history? My goal in this paper is to express my opinions in these 3 topics and provide examples to prove my point.…
Is war ever moral? I feel that War is a necessary part of life. Sometimes force is the only way to defend yourself or others. We are all equals, and It is immoral to take the life of anyone, but it is also immoral to let the life of anyone be taken. We have a responsibility to help each other because cooperation is the only way the human race can survive; we also have a right to defend ourselves. This means that if someone else is threatening you or anothers life, and you are capable of helping, you have an obligation to protect yourself or them.…
Moral law requires that all citizens and all nations do everything they can to avoid war. Pope Paul VI supported this notion by calling for “War no more; no more war!” in his speech to the United Nations assembly. The Church’s reason and the Law of Love tell us that it makes more sense to resolve conflicts without choosing violence, although this choice may be a difficult one to make. When war occurs, we may have to choose whether to defend ourselves through force and violence or through nonviolent resistance.…
Many wars have taken place in history, from around the globe and as far back in the bible. Most believe that wars are necessary when it is in defense of the nation or when all diplomatic methods have been exhausted to find a peaceful solution to any form of aggression. However, wars often cause more problems than peace. War is necessary whenever evil attempts to disrupt the peace of society. Though people say war itself is bad, war is not really about killing, war is about fighting for equality and freedom, though it should not be at the cost of others equal rights. War, a strategy used commonly by the Anglo-Saxons is best shown in modern day society through the works of the Army, Navy, and Air Force of the US.…
War, in the broadest sense, is a violent contact of distinct but similar entities (Wright 3-6). Different people may have very different opinions towards war. To some people, war is a plague which ought to be eliminated or a mistake which should be avoided; to others, it is an anachronism which no longer servers any purpose. However, there are some who take a more receptive attitude toward war and regard it as an instrument which may be useful, and a procedure which may be legitimate and appropriate, or a condition of existence for which one must be prepared. That is to say, war, to some extent, is very helpful and necessary for human society development. This essay will explain the reasons why war is necessary in human society. In the first part, the technology reasons will be mentioned and in the next part, the system reform reasons will be taken into consideration. In the end, an conclusion will be given about whether war is necessary in human society.…