Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Moral Permissibility of Same Sex Marriage

Better Essays
1458 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Moral Permissibility of Same Sex Marriage
The Moral Permissibility of Same-Sex Marriage Homosexuality has been a part of public consciousness in the United States for more than the past hundred years. Only recently has homosexuality been widely accepted as something other than a psychological disorder, but rather a trait (whether genetically or environmentally determined) which a person has the right to express. Some argue that homosexuals have a right to enter into legally recognized marriages with someone of the same sex. I tend to agree, and in this essay I will employ utilitarian and rights-based perspectives to illustrate why same-sex marriage is morally permissible and worthy of legalization. If I am to prove that same-sex marriage is morally permissible, I must examine both parts of this concept: "same-sex" and "marriage." I will begin by discussing marriage. Many people feel that only couples with two members of opposite sex deserve the right to marry on the basis that marriage carries an intrinsic implication of heterosexual union with an emphasis on love and monogamy and an end goal of procreation and child rearing. This implication is valid, because it is a veritable definition of the custom of marriage throughout history from a religious perspective. However, in the United States, religion is separated from legal matters such as a person 's right to enter into a recognized union with another person. Many people choose to affirm their commitment from a religious perspective by holding marriage ceremonies in a church, which are presided over by a religious official. The legal marriage ceremony is performed by a civil servant and is the only ceremony which can award a couple the legal rights that come with marriage. This implication also suggests that marriage is a means to produce children and raise them in a safe, loving environment. Child rearing is also not truly a part of marriage, as there is no legal provision of a marriage licensing encouraging or discouraging procreation. Child welfare laws do exist, but neither a marriage, nor a couple is required to raise a child. Essentially, a marriage is legally no more than a union between two people which affords those people certain social, legal, and financial benefits. But, as the above implication illustrates, the idea of marriage also carries a lot of baggage in the eyes of western society. It seems to me that it is part of man 's basest nature to cohabitate with other humans and raise children. In modern society, marriage is the best way to fulfill this nature, as it legally joins two people and affords them benefits if they choose to raise a family. Now I will examine the "same-sex" element of same-sex marriage. Marriage has traditionally joined two people of opposite sex, although one does not have to be heterosexual to marry, but simply willing to join into a union with a person of opposite sex. In proposed same-sex marriages, two people of the same sex would be joined in the union of marriage. People entering into same-sex marriages would not necessarily be homosexuals, but one can safely assume that most people applying for these marriages would be homosexuals. Many argue that homosexuality and homosexual relationships are intrinsically and instrumentally bad. If that is the case, then same-sex marriage, which would promote homosexual fidelity, is not morally permissible. Until recently, many states reinforced the notion that homosexual relations are bad through anti-sodomy laws. Much of the controversy concerning the morality of homosexuality is a distillation of the debate over whether homosexuality is genetically or environmentally determined. The fact that homosexuality has survived for centuries in spite of merciless persecution and oppression is proof enough that homosexuals are genetically predestined to be attracted to members of their own sex, and I will accept this proof as part of the basis for my argument. Thus, arguments that homosexuality is wrong because it is unnatural are simply baseless and prejudicial. Humans cannot control their genetically predetermined traits, so those traits beyond human control cannot be deemed unnatural. Another common argument for the moral impermissibility of homosexuality is that homosexual behavior and relationships are harmful to individuals and society. As homosexuality is clearly a natural behavior, displaying, confronting, and discussing such behavior openly is a step toward a more enlightened and liberated society. As society is becoming more accepting of homosexuals, those who are prejudiced against or afraid of homosexuals will clearly be at a disadvantage. Homosexuals do not commonly pressure heterosexuals to "turn gay," and since homosexuality is genetically determined, any such efforts would be unsuccessful. Therefore, those afraid that giving rights to homosexuals would breed more homosexuals have nothing to fear. I have explored the essence of marriage and the root of homosexual morality and prejudice, but now I must explore the unification of both concepts in same-sex marriage. From a rights-based moral perspective, same-sex marriage is a natural right of man. According to the United States government, all people have the right to pursue success and happiness. The United States Supreme Court has ruled that all citizens have the right to marry, procreate, and raise children (all of which are means to success and happiness). United States citizens legally enjoy these rights, and these rights are also good models for those rights that people naturally possess. If a person possesses the right to marry whoever he wants, and homosexuality is a natural trait, then a natural right of man is the right the ability to marry someone of the same sex. A purpose of marriage is to organize people into a family structure which provides a safer, more comfortable, more nurturing environment for the couple that is married and any children they may rear. Homosexuals have the right to live in such an environment and to live in a society which encourages and respects such a living arrangement. Aside from the basic rights of marriage, homosexuals also deserve other rights and benefits associated with marriage. In the United States, certain benefits are given to married couples such as financial breaks allowed by joint filing of income taxes, inheritance tax breaks, spousal insurance benefits, hospital visitation rights, divorce litigation rights, child support benefits in the event of a divorce, among other rights and benefits. Preventing homosexual couples from marrying not only denies them the emotional and social benefits of marriage, but also the financial and legal benefits awarded to married couples. Same-sex marriage is also morally permissible from a utilitarian perspective. If legalizing same-sex marriage is harmful to society as a whole, denying homosexuals the right to marry is permissible. Although homosexuals may suffer, the right to marry may be denied them if it benefits the American people. However, legally recognizing same-sex marriages is beneficial not only to homosexuals, but also to the rest of society. People have been "coming out" about their sexual orientation in increasing numbers in recent years as a result of society 's greater acceptance of homosexual behavior. People as a whole have become more comfortable living, working, and interacting with openly homosexual people. If homosexuals are given the right to marry, and the naturalness of their feelings is validated by the government in addition to society, they will be able to lead lives that are happier, more self-actualized, and more beneficial to society. As homosexuals are living more openly, they are also raising children through artificial insemination, custody settlements, and other means. The American Academy of Pediatrics feels that children are happier, more secure, and more successful when they are raised by two parents rather than one. The Academy also feels that being raised by two parents of the same sex affords children the same benefits as being raised by two parents of opposite sex (Coparent… 339). It is obvious that children who enjoy these benefits as a child will grow into happier, more productive adults and ultimately bring greater benefit to society. Although homosexuality is completely natural, some of those that view it as unnatural fear that children raised by homosexual parents are more prone to become homosexuals and succumb to the pressure to engage in the "immoral activity" of homosexuality. As homosexuality is genetically predetermined, the sexual orientation of a child 's parents has no bearing on his own sexual orientation, and all research on the subject has shown that homosexual parents are just as likely to produce homosexual offspring as heterosexual parents. Ultimately, homosexuals deserve the right to marry as it is a natural right of man. It is also in the best interest of the United States and society as a whole to legally recognize same-sex marriages. Works Cited
"Coparent or Second-Parent Adoption by Same-Sex Parents." Pediatrics 109 (2002): 339.

Cited: "Coparent or Second-Parent Adoption by Same-Sex Parents." Pediatrics 109 (2002): 339.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    In 1987, Lynne Cox, an American long distance swimmer, braved the frigid waters of the Bering Strait to swim between the US and the Soviet Union in a bid to promote peace between the Cold War enemies.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction: This paper will examine why homosexual couples should have the right to marry. Throughout this paper many different issues will be brought up including: political issues, religious issues and legal issues.…

    • 411 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the world has developed-and is still developing- controversial topics like gay marriage are still prominent is today’s society. William J. Bennett, an influential figure in America, strongly voiced out his standpoint on the topic of same-sex marriage through his article “Against Gay Marriage.” His concerns persistently argue that the rights for gay marriages are “pointless and even oxymoronic” (Bennett, 2011, p.409). One does not need to fully agree with his assertions to acknowledge the intensity and goodness of his mind. Although Bennett’s stance constructs serious opposition and serves as a valuable argument, committing numerous logical fallacies in his text weaken his argument and made his overall reasoning less credible.…

    • 732 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Opposing Viewpoints

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Wilkins, Richard G. "The Constitutionality of Legal Preferences for Heterosexual Marriage." Family in America June 2001: n. pag. Rpt. in Homosexuality. Ed. Helen Cothran. San Diego: Greenhaven, 2003. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 5 May…

    • 1126 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Writing Project three

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The legalization of same-sex marriage is fought strongly by both sides. Those against same-sex marriages fear legalizing them would diminish traditional marriages, along with having other concerns. The main view of those for same-sex marriage legalization is that they see it as a right to gays and lesbians. The question is which side is right? Would the legalization of same-sex marriages take away from traditional marriages or is it a right not being honored? The question of same-sex marriage brings with it the question why. Is it important for same-sex marriages to be legalized considering that same-sex couples can live in cohabitation even in the states where same-sex marriages are illegal? These are a few of the age old questions pertaining to the issue of same-sex marriage legalization. While many American’s view on marriage is that they are between a man and a woman, there are still several who believe same-sex marriages should be legalized.…

    • 1642 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    * Being married is a source of stability and commitment "Case No. S147999 in the Supreme Court of the State of California": "Being married is a source of stability and commitment for the relationship between spouses. Barriers to terminating a marriage include feelings of obligation to one’s spouse, children, and other family members; moral and religious values about divorce; legal restrictions; financial concerns; and the expected disapproval of friends and the community."…

    • 1691 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    WGU GLT1

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages

    There is growing attention to the issue of marriage equality for gay people in this country. As of the writing of this paper, 16 of the 50 states in the United States of America have legalized gay marriage, either by legislation or by popular vote (Wisniewski, 2013). The discourse regarding the issue becomes quite contentious largely because of non-secular ideology that has demonized the concept of homosexuality for many years. As a sociological issue, the conflict has become a divisive force for many, from political powers as far down to the family level. The constitution guarantees equal rights for all in this country; freedom of religion, speech, etc. yet appears to stall when equal rights for the gay community are involved. There has been significantly more popular support for the cause recently, but the stigma and prejudice continue to linger. Is this a moral debate or has an outdated ideology become so embraced by many that the battle has only just begun?…

    • 878 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    A very big topic that lingers on the hearts and minds of so many Americans today, on the desks of so many politicians and in so many courtrooms around the country today is gay marriage. There are two very identifiable sides to this debate and both sides have very defendable points of view, which are constantly being publically expressed by radicals and extremist from both sides of the spectrum. My point of views differ from those who believe that gay marriage should remain illegal however, I am going to look at both sides of this huge debate and argue the point that homosexuals should be granted the right to marry whomever they please because it is not only unconstitutional, but unjust and logically improper to forfeit to this group of people the same, equal rights to marriage as heterosexuals simply because of their sexual orientation.…

    • 1566 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the most controversial topics of today’s matter is whether gay marriage should be legalized or not. There are numerous reactions when this subject comes to discussion and can sometimes lead to a heated debate. Some individuals believe that homosexuality is unethical while people who agree with gay marriage believe to put in consideration that the sexual preference of another human being is necessary. With every conflict comes pros and cons and this topic is like pulling a tight-rope if ever brought up in a debate because you never know who will pull the rope tighter. Gay marriage has a vast influence on the society today, relevant to it becoming legalized, it is bound to impact future generations, and will affect the establishment of marriage later in life.…

    • 697 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are many controversies surrounding today's world, such as abortion, animal testing, and social reform issues. It seems that no one can come to a common agreement on the legitimacy of these topics. Personal characteristics, such as upbringing, culture, religion and ethnicity, all play a role in determining one's feelings on a given controversial issue. However, one of the most protested and discussed issues in current political debate is same-sex marriage. There is no right or wrong answer to this question, only hard pressed arguments expressing speculation regarding supposed outcomes, benefits and possible tribulations that would come along with the endorsement of gay marriage. Such ideas are shown in pieces of writing by Manuel A. Lopez, in "The Case Against Gay Marriage" and by Scott Bidstrup in " Gay Marriage: The Arguments and Motives." These issues both discuss and contend common controversy surrounding the gay marriage debate. After reading and analyzing each essay, it is observed that Manuel A. Lopez' style of writing and literary tone give him the upper hand in establishing a more effective piece.…

    • 1492 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    If the fetus you save is gay, will you still fight for its rights? (http://smartassproducts.hubpages.com) This is an ongoing ethical dilemma in our world today. With many states starting to recognize gay unions, and those who oppose it, the issues have raised many ethical questions like my opening statement.…

    • 1171 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    gay marriage outline

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages

    a. Marriage is a basic human right for every individual. Same sex marriage should be legalized.…

    • 2022 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    If there is anything that gets me riled up and ready to debate, it’s the controversial topic of gay rights and those who appose them. In Charles Colson and Anne Morse’s essay opposing gay marriage, “Societal Suicide,” they express that marriage should be seen as a “traditional building block of human society.” It goes on to explain their tired and bias conclusion that marriage is a bond that should only be between a man and a woman. At the same time, they question the extinction of marriage because of same-sex couple’s oppressed desire to happily marry each other. How is making it legal for supporters of marriage and gay people in love to express their bond considered the end of marriage? Allowing gays to marry would not only promote marriage, but it would support the obvious right and humane decision to care for every citizen with liberty and justice for ALL! “Societal Suicide” explains that gay marriage is not only wrong, but goes against the natural order of the family system, as well as promotes “broken families” and crime amongst young people without mothers or fathers, all the while, weakening the meaning and status of heterosexual marriage. I do not believe in any reason for keeping people from being who they are if there is no harm being done to others. Gay marriage should absolutely be legalized because we all deserve equal rights regardless of skin color, religion, ethnicity, occupation, or sexuality.…

    • 1282 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Harvey Milk

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Gay marriage has slowly become a social norm amongst individuals of today’s society. Initially, this leads to the discussion of homosexuals having the right to marry in society. Ultimately, conflict from the opposing position of ‘against’ gay marriage may arise that gay marriage can destroy the concept of marriage and mock the importance of the bible. In reference to this; everyone in society has the right to marry regardless of gender, thus it should be socially acceptable. However, this is why it is significant to discuss both sides of the argument, regardless homosexuals do not…

    • 1047 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Sex and Marriage

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Marriage has been one of the most fundamental principals of human society since the beginning of time. Traditionally understood marriage is restricted to two people, particularly a women and a man. Since the nature of marriage is changing with modern times and people are marrying for love not just social needs should the notion that is reviewed by society and this long- confirmed definition be reconfigured and opened in order to make same-sex marriage suitable in society or refuse same-sex marriage? More than half of all people in the United States oppose gay marriage, even though three fourths are otherwise supportive of gay rights. This means that many of the same people who are even passionately in favor of gay rights oppose gays on this one issue (Bidstrup). Many moral controversies revolve around gay marriage such as, marriage is an institution between one man and one woman and gay relationships are immoral. John Corvino rejects the view that homosexuality is immoral in his article, “Why Shouldn’t Tommy and Jim Have Sex? A Defense of Homosexuality.” He responds to two arguments against homosexual sex, that it is unnatural and harmful. Unnatural refers to that which deviates from the norm, from what most people do. Corvino distinguishes various senses of “unnatural” and his overall conclusion in this regard is that homosexual sex is not unnatural in any morally relevant sense. He defends the practice of homosexuality against the charge that is harmful. He takes issue both with the claim that the practice of homosexuality is harmful to those who engage in it and with the claim that others are threatened by it (Mappes). Many people believe that marriage should be between a man and a woman because that is the view installed throughout the Bible. One major notion commonly heard is, God made Adam and Even and that is what binds marriage and morality. Many believe same-sex marriage is immoral but who is permitted to determine the morality of…

    • 1426 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays

Related Topics