Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Most Dangerous Game

Good Essays
823 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Most Dangerous Game
Is General Zaroff Civilized or Uncivilized?
Marc Bekoff once said, “These enthusiasts often like to hang signs that say ‘Gone Fishin’’ or ‘Gone Huntin’’. But what these slogans really mean is ‘Gone Killing’”. In “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford falls into the water on Shiptrap Island. He goes in search for food and finds a palatial chateau. General Zaroff gives him food and clothes. But, then Rainsford finds out about General Zaroff’s game and wants to leave the island immediately and instead of letting him go, the general wants to hunt Rainsford. In the end, Rainsford ends up winning the “game” and gets to sleep in the bed at the palatial chateau. Even though General Zaroff seems civilized with his polite actions, he is actually uncivilized because he is mentally unstable.
One way that General Zaroff is mentally unstable is because he is a murderer. When Rainsford and General Zaroff are talking about hunting, General Zaroff mentions that there is only one animal that can reason with him and that is why they are the most dangerous, Rainsford finally gets that he means he is a murderer. When he asks what he means though, General Zaroff explains, “‘It’s and game you see’, pursued the general blandly, ‘I suggest to one of them that we go hunting. I give him a supply of food and an excellent hunting knife. I give him a three hours’ head start. I am to follow, armed only with a pistol of the smallest caliber and range. If my quarry eludes me for three whole days, he wins the game. If I find him’ -the general smiled- ‘he loses’” (66). By this, General Zaroff means that he kills the man. Then, Rainsford asks what happens if the man refuses to be hunted. General Zaroff then explains that the man has a choice between getting whipped by Ivan, his servant, or the hunt and they usually choose the hunt. While General Zaroff is explaining that, he also explains that he has not lost yet. Another way that General Zaroff is proven a murderer is because of how he has a collection of human heads. He explains that one person almost did win and that he had to take his dogs with him to take care of it. Once he shows Rainsford his dogs he asks him, “‘And now’, said the general ‘I want to show you my new collection of heads. Will you come with me to the library?’” (66). Rainsford then has to run out of the room and to bed because he then explains that is not feeling well. The heads are another way of showing that he is a murderer because you can only suspect that his collection of heads is human heads because just moments before, they were talking about how he is hunting people. Overall, General Zaroff is mentally unstable by being a murderer because he plays a hunting game with humans and has a collection of human heads. Another way that General Zaroff is mentally unstable is because of his philosophy on life. General Zaroff has just explained to Rainsford that he hunts humans and Rainsford calls it murder. General Zaroff then tells Rainsford that his beliefs of right and wrong are particularly the wrong way to live life. He then explains his philosophy as “Life is for the strong, to be lived by the strong, and, if need be, taken by the strong. The weak of the world were put here to give the strong pleasure. I am strong. Why should I not use my gift? If I wish to hunt, why should I not? I hunt the scum of the earth—sailors from tramp ships—lascars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels—a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them” (64). General Zaroff is kind of explaining that he hunts all types of people and that if you are not like him, he will hunt you. Another example of how General Zaroff is mentally unstable because of his philosophy on life is that he could have just killed Rainsford when he found him, but instead he played him. He blew a circle of smoke at him as if to look like a target, and then turned around and went home. When Rainsford finally realizes that, he describes it as “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day’s sport! The Cossack was the cat; he was the mouse” (70). In these words, General Zaroff was trying to explain that Rainsford needed to hide better because he had already found him. General Zaroff was giving Rainsford a chance to live because he could have killed Rainsford right then and there. Overall, General Zaroff is mentally unstable because of his philosophy on life. Although General Zaroff may seem civilized by his polite actions, he is actually uncivilized because he is mentally unstable.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    In an action movie, producers and directors add certain music to certain scenes to make them more suspenseful, sad, etc. Many authors add details to a story about the setting to accomplish the same goal. In the story, Most Dangerous Game, the author adds many details about the dark night, General Zaroff’s mansion, and the jungle to add more suspense, or terror, to the story.…

    • 469 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Are you scared of drowning, being stuck on a desolate island, being killed by someone? In Richard Connell’s short story, The most dangerous game, tells us how the exact same thing happens to a guy named Sanger Rainsford, a big game hunter. At first everything was fine and Rainsford was sailing to Rio with his companion Whitney, the next thing he knows he is on an island playing a game with a man who loves to hunt humans. This tells us that you should never trust a desolate island.…

    • 544 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are two main characters in the story “The Most Dangerous Game.” Rainsford and Zaroff encounter each other when Rainsford was on his yacht headed to hunt in Rio. He falls over board and ends up on an island and the only house on the island belongs to General Zaroff. Zaroff invites Rainsford into his home and is a very good host to him. He offers him food, clothing, and a place to rest, but little does Rainsford know, Zaroff has another plan for him. Zaroff plans to kill him by sending him out to play a “game”. These two characters have many differences, but the also have their similarities.…

    • 543 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When people are put at their mercy’s wits, they will do some extravagant things. In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game,” Sanger Rainsford is the person who deals with these things. The story focuses on Rainsford, a one time, big game hunter, and the events on an island that he swims to after falling off Whitney’s ship. On Ship-Trap Island, Rainsford encounters and is hunted by a deranged man named General Zaroff, who is a tall man with no heart, and likes to hunt more dangerous game. During the events on Ship-Trap Island, Rainsford is witty, exhibits extravagant survival skills, and encounters a revelation.…

    • 319 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, Rainsford is a man who is trapped on a island where they hunt humans. He begins the story as being a hunter and had no understanding of what the animals he hunted felt, but towards the end he understands what it feels like as he is hunted. His dynamic personality and behavior shows that Rainsford is quick-witted, talented, and level-headed.…

    • 602 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Zaroff directly states, “ I hunt the scum of the earth: sailors from tramp ships-lassars, blacks, Chinese, whites, mongrels- a thoroughbred horse or hound is worth more than a score of them.”(Richard Connell 5) The general also explains to Rainsford how this is the only worthy opponent left that still intrigues him and gives him the thrill of the hunt. Mainly because they are the only quarry that can have reason versus the other quarries who only have instinct. Consequently Rainsford was the next prey the general had in mind. Zaroff says that, “ Instinct is no match for reason.”(Richard Connell 5) The final way that the reader can analyze Zaroff’s thrill seeking trait is his ability to understand his limits, and know that a hunt is only exciting if it’s prey is a contest to his abilities. This can be inferred in the story when Zaroff tracked Rainsford through the forest in the dark, and when he did find Rainsford, he simply turned and walked away with his smile on his face. The reader could infer and Rainsford said, “The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day's sport.”(Richard Connell 10) This shows the reader that killing his own prey is of no enjoyment to Zaroff unless it is a challenge. This is why Zaroff did not kill Rainsford the first time, because he is not…

    • 695 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When you first read the most dangerous game you are automatically faced with the question of the two men’s humanity. Are they barbarians? Are they completely sane? The main question is, are either of them civilized? When you think about it Sanger Rainsford is clearly more civilized compared to General Zaroff. I know this because he is with the common folk, he can tell that killing is immoral, and acts in a mature respectful way.…

    • 529 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Imagine ending up an island that has a very bad reputation by all sailors. At first you think that it is not dangerous, but then you learn about what happens on the island. Rainsford and his friend Whitney were on a boat travelling to Rio. The short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell is a very suspenseful story that shows how Rainsford is very brilliant. Rainsford is on his boat when he falls off and lands in the water and he ends up swimming to the island nearby that all sailors hate sailing past. Rainsford is very smart because when he gets to the island he knows many tricks he learned from hunting for many years and he uses them to help him win against Zaroff. Rainsford shows he's smart throughout the story by creating…

    • 421 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story, “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, Sanger Rainsford and General Zaroff are distinct characters who share a passion for hunting big-game, but disagree on the value of human life. This disagreement leads Rainsford to kill Zaroff and end…

    • 614 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    This is a grisly joke. ""Why should I not be serious? I am speaking of hunting.""Hunting? General Zaroff, what you speak of is murder"" (Connell’s The Most Dangerous Game). Before Rainsford was swept away on the island, he would never have taken another person's life, as looking at this action as murder, not just a game.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    In the short story “The Most Dangerous Game” by Richard Connell, the story's protagonist Sanger Rainsford is hunted throughout the jungle of an uninhabited island, by General Zaroff a man who is fixated on hunting humans for sport. In the short story “Lady or the Tiger?” by Frank Stockton, an imperious, semi-barbaric king rules over his kingdom with an iron fist, when his daughter falls in love with a young man he uses this opportunity to put the man in a public arena, where his is given the option of marriage or death. Both authors create villainous characters…

    • 314 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Once Zaroff revealed what his “most dangerous game” was, he attempted to justify his murderous hobby by arguing that, “‘I am strong...If I wish to hunt why should I not,’”(10). Here, Zaroff is committing a standard mistake; he does something because he can, but morally should not. The only way he actually justifies his “game” is by saying that it is diverting and provides a challenge for him. The belief that he is all-powerful blinds him from the fact that since he has frequently perpetrated against innocent humans, he will have to pay for his actions. Furthermore, Zaroff concluded that Rainsford had perished, but he is later proven wrong. As an illustration, “A man, who had been hiding in the curtains of the bed, was standing there… ‘I congratulate you’... ‘You have won the game,’”(18). Connell uses this event to affirm that Zaroff had indeed been hunted all along. Although he did not realize it, Zaroff was gradually falling prey to Rainsford. The American was constantly outsmarting him and made numerous attempts on his life. Throughout the story Rainsford was gaining leverage; it is clear he won because Zaroff was cocky and ignorant of his surroundings. In Zaroff’s case, the very thing that made him powerful debilitated…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Most dangerous game

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages

    First published in 1924, Richard Connell 's "The Most Dangerous Game" is perhaps the finest example to date of the "hunter-becomes-the-hunted" tale. Connell, a combat veteran of World War I, began with a somewhat hackneyed plot line, but via excellent description, taut pacing, and crisp dialogue, the young writer produced a surprisingly enduring action-adventure story. Winner of the O 'Henry Memorial Award the year it was published, the tale remains a staple of anthologies of American short fiction. Although commonly dismissed as little more than an exciting, testosterone-pumping duel between two well-matched professional hunters, there is a deeper political and social meaning to this widely read but rarely critiqued story. Beneath the thrill of the chase, the two main characters--Sanger Rainsford, a young American traveler, and General Zaroff, an old Russian aristocrat--represent competing views of the world that were at strong odds in the first quarter of the twentieth century.…

    • 1207 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Humans in order to hunt and kill them must learn the jungle or other terrain in which the animals live. Zaroff and rainsford shared different views on hunting, Gen. zerof at one time enjoyed hunting beasts but after becoming an expert at animals the sport did not please him as much as it did, so he began to hunt human pray which has a greater intellect than an animal. On the other hand ainsford, after becoming very good at hunting has not lost the enjoyment, and when he hears that General zaroff hunts man and would like to have a “hunt” with him he begins to get nervous. General zaroff thinks that there is nothing wrong hunting man and even says that “I am not a murder but a hunter”. That one line is very unsettling because anyone in there right mind would know if not at least feel that it is wrong to kill other human beings. It is very unsettling how gen zerof asks rainsford if he may hunt him as if he was commenting about the whether and how it was going to be a nice day and if he would like a nice cup of…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    What happen when a person without experienced skills enters the wild? In the story of To Build a Fire, the author mentioned about a green hand entering the cold region in Canada. Because of his self-conceit, he died. In another story, the protagonist accept a challenge from a general. He had to hide in an island for three days without letting the general to find him out, and he hide successfully for three days and won the game. While both To Build a Fire and The Most Dangerous Game represent a surviving story, the main character in The Most Dangerous Game behaved wiser for he had accumulated lots of experience and survived successfully.…

    • 536 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics