Claggart is friendly toward Billy at first and Billy thinks he seems content with his performance. Billy is surprised later when he is judged by Claggart for small errors. One night, a guard wakes up Billy and takes him to a private area of the ship.…
Have you ever heard a motivational speech and while it was going on you felt so motivated, but when it was over you did not know what to do with yourself? In Beyond Scared Straight, "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God," and "Can Kids Be Scared Straight?" all three authors try to persuade people to do the right things in a forceful tone, but there are reasons why appeals to fear is not the best motivational force. Some reasons why appeals to fear is not the best motivational force are that people might not get scared, are not afraid of the negative consequences, and do not want to nor know how to change.…
Menacingly, Claggart consistently harassed Billy. Eerily, Claggart shadowed Billy like a lion stalks his prey. Conniving, Claggart, devised a complex and sophisticated plan that the naïve and transparent Billy Budd could never have detected.…
When Jonathan Edwards gave his sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” (291-303) he used several analogies that would give his listeners a better understanding of the danger the non-believers were in.…
When first reading Jonathan Edwards’ sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” shocked readers how it started right in about the wrath of God and Hell. His diction and images create a tone of alarming immediacy – act now for your own good.…
Jonathan Edwards shows great anger in this sermon through the use of metaphors, personification, and diction.…
“Sinners in the hands of an angry God” was preached by Jonathan Edwards during a time when the people were relying on science more than their saviour in heaven, a time when people were lacking in their spiritual needs. This speech opened the eyes of many, and was so powerful it may very well have been the trigger of the great awakening. But why was this speech so powerful? Why did this speech change the lives of thousands? As we can see he used plenty of persuasive techniques, he is very descriptive in his imagery and uses simple metaphors to persuade thousands to repent of their sinful ways and turn to Christ. He planted fear and guilt into their hearts. This sermon is a sermon full of anger and fright, a sermon powerful enough to make the strongest man cry and weep. But the true purpose of this sermon was to bring hope to a nation in need. It ultimately was a message of redemption, a message that Jonathan Edwards believed people needed to hear.…
I found "Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God" written by Jonathan Edwards as a terrible misconception. From the things I've learned through my own faith and Theology classes I've taken God is nothing like the god that Edwards portrays. Edwards's god is one of destruction and hatred. Where as the true God is full of love and compassion for his children. This sermon suggests that God is ready at any moment to condemn man to Hell. In Theology however we learned that God does not choose to send anyone to Hell, rather it is our sin that condemn us to this destiny. Edwards fills his sermon with scripture in an attempt to solidify his beliefs. However upon closer examination these quotes are bits and pieces of the complete text. These instances…
Damned or not Damned! A unique look at “Sinners In The Hands Of An Angry God”…
The text’s Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God, by Jonathan Edwards, and The Minister’s Black Veil, by Nathaniel Hawthorne both have pretty similar subjects. Both texts talk about preachers and sins, and how sinning is bad, and you can’t try to cover up your sins, it will just bring you down.…
Fear can change people from bad to good. And sometimes the people are so worried about being cool they don’t even act like fear is not even a tragically developing change. The fear that teens have seeing their family hurts and their friends shot sometime shows them that they shouldn’t be on the streets to be cool. The main goal of being on the streets is to show that you are man enough to be friends with everyone.…
Imagine being told how to make a moral and not an immoral life decision. In recent discussions regarding learning forms, a controversial issue has been whether it is better for people to learn through fear or through positive example. On the one hand, some argue that learning through fear teaches discipline. On the other hand, however, others argue that learning by positive example teaches nothing and is shortly forgotten. It appears that it is better to frighten the learner into making the right choice than to show them how it is done. Jonathan Edwards’ sermon, “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God,” and Benjamin Franklin’s, “Autobiography,” portray how to succeed in the world in two completely different ways. Edwards speaks through…
Jonathan Edwards's sermon “Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” delivers the dogma that only the mercy of God can save one from being condemned to Hell. Edwards appealed to his followers’ fear as a way of guiding his flock towards what he saw as the correct principles of Christian faith; the intensely terrifying metaphors of the sermon were his trademark.…
“Sinners in the Hands of an Angry God” is a sermon given by Johnathan Edwards, a preacher and a theologian. Published in 1741, Edwards’ sermon is one of most defining pieces of literature during the First Great Awakening in the United States. The Day of Doom is a poem written by Michael Wigglesworth, a Puritan minister. The poem became wildly popular in Puritan New England when it was published in 1662. Both texts discuss the themes of divine judgement and punishment. Edwards’ sermon illustrates that it is God’s will that keeps evil men from being sent down to hell. Wigglesworth describes the Day of Judgement in which God will decide who will be saved who will be sent to hell. These pieces of religious literature both describe a harsh God who has ultimate judgement and no mercy when it comes to punishment.…
A mysterious stranger wanders into the small mountain village of Viscos with eleven gold bars in his possession. He buries the first ten in a particular spot in the surrounding forest, and places the eleventh in a different location, all of this unbeknownst to the villagers. He then brings Miss Chantal Prym, a Viscos villager longing for the big city, into the forest with him and shows her the location of the gold bars. He then proposes a deal: if she can convince the townspeople to kill any nonspecific citizen in Viscos, the eleven gold bars with be turned over to the village, providing much-needed financial support for the town and its people. However, Miss Prym can also choose to steal one of the gold bars for herself. If the townspeople choose to act upon the stranger’s proposition, the stranger will conclude that all humans are evil. If Miss Prym chooses to steal the stranger’s gold (which is an easy means of escaping Viscos), he will conclude that both good and evil humans exist. He doesn’t bother mentioning a third outcome. Miss Prym internally debates for days whether to tell the villagers of the stranger’s deal, or to simply take the money and run out of fear they might choose to kill her. Eventually though, she tells the townspeople of the stranger’s twisted experiment, telling herself that the villagers are too kindhearted to commit such a horrendous act. As one may expect, she’s shocked when the people of Viscos ultimately nominate to kill Old Berta, an elderly widow deemed unnecessary to their society. Miss Prym is evidently unhappy with their decision, and attempts to figure out a way to stop it. Right before the villagers finally go to murder Berta, Miss Prym steps in and tells them to simply look at what they’re doing, and to ask themselves if it is truly justified. She convinces them to stop their murderous plans by reminding them that humans are not inherently good or bad, but that our nature depends on each person’s control and choices.…