Preview

The Myth of Immortality Summary by Clarence Darrow

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
310 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Myth of Immortality Summary by Clarence Darrow
In his essay "The Myth of Immortality," Clarence Darrow explains his belief that life after death is a hoax and backs up his logic with logical reasoning. Darrow finds it hard to believe that life exists after death simply because there are no facts to prove that it exists. He states that "if people really believed in a beautiful, happy, glorious land waiting after death why don't they hasten themselves to it." Darrow also shows his discern in his views for the soul questioning that if we do have a soul, when is it created in the natural process of reproduction? He also questions "If a man has a soul that persists after death, that goes to a heaven of the blessed or to a hell of the damned, where are those places?" Moreover, he goes into detail and explains his reasoning against the resurrection of the body. He states the mere thought of such ideas beggars reason, ignores facts, and enthrones blind faith, wild dreams, hopeless hopes, and cowardly fears as sovereign of the human mind, despite the fact the bible clearly states that Jesus has risen from the dead and ascended into heaven. Darrow moves on into the scientific reasoning stating that people take comfort in the law that matter and force cannot be destroyed, meaning their soul lives on forever. Darrow continues and says that there is no proof that memory and consciousness exists after death. Even more, Darrow continues with his statement "We are assured that without faith, life is only desolation and despair." Or in other words, Darrow says that people "create" a place that exists after death in order to ease the natural fears. In conclusion Darrow states "we should be more kind to each other and make our lives easier for we live a common life and die a common

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Part two of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks discusses the fate of Henrietta’s cells after she passes away. George Gey, the doctor that originally received Henrietta’s cells without her permission, asks her husband if he can perform an autopsy on Henrietta so that he can gain more knowledge on her cells. He wanted as many of her organs as possible to see if they would grow like the HeLa cells. Day refused at first because he planned on having a funeral, but Dr. Gey insisted that he perform the autopsy and promised to make her body suitable for a funeral.…

    • 424 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Skloot states on page 130 of her book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, that a doctor named Southam was withholding health information from patients. The reasoning behind Southam holding back the patient's health information is as followed. As Skloot says, “ The deception was for his benefit-- he was withholding information because patients might have refused to participate in his study if they’d known what he was injecting.” (Skloot 130) I believe with the information and/or the evidence given to me by Skloot that the rest of the excerpt is relevant and sufficient to support her claim.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    consent, while it was a huge benefit to the medical field and mankind, was highly unethical and…

    • 758 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can both agree and dissagree with Edward Koch 's opinions in his essay called Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life. Some of the arguments that he has presented seemed valid, however, he didn 't supply enough facts to back up what he was saying for many of his examples. It seemed to me that most of what Edward Koch was saying had more to do with his own opinion on capital punishment than on any type of reasearch he has done on the topic.…

    • 648 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    I can remember how when I was young I believed death to be a phenomenon of the body; now I know it to be merely a function of the mind−and that of the minds of the ones who suffer the bereavement. The nihilists say it is the end; the fundamentalists, the beginning; when in reality it is no more than a single tenant or family moving out of a tenement or a town (42).…

    • 408 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Recall: In the reading “Do We Survive Death” I would consider all sections of this chapter main pints. Not only because they seem and had a great headline but because many people believe in Immortal Soul, Afterlife, Near-death experiences, Reincarnation, Communication with the Dead, and miracles. All this topics show plenty of evidence or they have been tested and had found plenty of remarkable things that will leave a person speechless and not knowing what to think about the person informing them about the event.…

    • 934 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” it starts off with the story of a women…

    • 1596 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    In “The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality”, Bernard Williams argues that immortality is undesirable because one would achieve one’s categorical desires which will cause one to become bored and find immortality undesirable. In this paper, I will argue that this argument fails because if one lives a recognizably human life, they will experience memory decay thus allowing them to repeat the same categorical desires without becoming bored. In addition, if one must experience immortality in a recognizably human form then they and everything and everyone else around them will be, therefore giving the one with an eternal life a constant task of trying to perfect everything and everyone (mortals).…

    • 1175 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot, exposes the story of Henrietta Lacks; a black woman not only under privileged but also under medical research without her nor her family’s consent. Skloot’s approach to the Lacks family in researching and writing the novel is unethical and can be analyzed as well as supported through her leading intent for the novel, the originality of the language used, and her personal claim to ‘white privilege.’…

    • 1304 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    William James’ views about life after life death can be summed up in two words, not…

    • 2489 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    One definition of death is the the complete and permanent cessation of all vital functions in a living creature, the end if life. All philosophers agree that our earthly life in our physical form will end; however philosophers disagree on the meaning of end of life as many people agree on death as the end of our existence however while others argue that we continue in some form after death. Many ideas relating to our existence after death include; the continuation of our genes thought our descendants, immortality of the soul, resurrection of the body, reincarnation and the idea that we live on in memories of others. Many religious beliefs are based on the idea that humans possess a "soul" or "spirit" which exists independently of the body. The notion of life after death is therefore of central concern to religious believers and it is important to establish what surviving death exactly means. There are two main theories developed for the meaningful survival after death: materialism and dualism.…

    • 1412 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Apol 104

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages

    “Is there life after death?” and “What will happen to me when I die?” There is life after death, but there are two different places that one can live their eternal life after death (Roman 6:23). Eternal life can be spent in Heaven or in the fire pits of Hell. God determines whether we live eternal life in Heaven or Hell; when he judges us based on our lives on earth (2 Corinthians 5:10).…

    • 477 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Dr. David Searls, a professor of genetics and science philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine said "Seeing death as the end of life is like seeing the horizon as the end of the ocean." i This image expresses the belief that there is more to the existence of the human spirit than our physical life on Earth.…

    • 2663 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Best Essays

    Throughout all recorded history mankind has battled to find answers to each and every one of life’s questions and to some avail found quite a few; still, one question that has yet to be answered pertains to the possibility of life after death. Some argue that the idea of survival of consciousness without a body is extremely impractical and out of the question; however, when relying on only practical evidence alone it is hard to formulate a concrete theory. On the other hand, when we look at things such as cross-cultural studies on near death experiences and their underlying similarities we can utilize them as clues to suggest the possibility of an afterlife. Using both logic and intuition we should be able to gain some insight on the matter.…

    • 1781 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    William Gay 's feeling about euthanasia is that the idea of Euthanasia is not the practice a lot but it is slowly gaining acceptance within our society. According to Cynics there is an increasing tendency to devalue human life, but William Gay don 't believe this is the major factor. The acceptance of Euthanasia is much more likely to be the result of unthinking gentleness and showing kindness. He wants to show that euthanasia is wrong and it is inherently wrong, but it is also wrong judged from the standpoints of self-interest and of practical effects. He defines Euthanasia as, "an essential aspect of euthanasia is that it involves taking a human life, either one 's own or that of another. Also, the person whose life is taken must be someone who is believed to be suffering from some disease or injury from which recovery cannot reasonably be expected. Finally, the action must be deliberate and intentional." Thus, euthanasia is intentionally taking the life of a presumably hopeless person. Whether the life is one 's own or that of another, the taking of it is still euthanasia.…

    • 802 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays