Part two of The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks discusses the fate of Henrietta’s cells after she passes away. George Gey, the doctor that originally received Henrietta’s cells without her permission, asks her husband if he can perform an autopsy on Henrietta so that he can gain more knowledge on her cells. He wanted as many of her organs as possible to see if they would grow like the HeLa cells. Day refused at first because he planned on having a funeral, but Dr. Gey insisted that he perform the autopsy and promised to make her body suitable for a funeral.…
Skloot states on page 130 of her book, The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, that a doctor named Southam was withholding health information from patients. The reasoning behind Southam holding back the patient's health information is as followed. As Skloot says, “ The deception was for his benefit-- he was withholding information because patients might have refused to participate in his study if they’d known what he was injecting.” (Skloot 130) I believe with the information and/or the evidence given to me by Skloot that the rest of the excerpt is relevant and sufficient to support her claim.…
consent, while it was a huge benefit to the medical field and mankind, was highly unethical and…
In Plato’s Phaedo, socrates tells us his theories of the soul before and after death. He shows us that the body and soul are separate and the soul stays after death and lives before being born.…
In the book “The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks” it starts off with the story of a women…
Despite death’s permanence,…
I can both agree and dissagree with Edward Koch 's opinions in his essay called Death and Justice: How Capital Punishment Affirms Life. Some of the arguments that he has presented seemed valid, however, he didn 't supply enough facts to back up what he was saying for many of his examples. It seemed to me that most of what Edward Koch was saying had more to do with his own opinion on capital punishment than on any type of reasearch he has done on the topic.…
Thesis Statement: There is a human aspiration to live forever and a way to cope with this belief is through symbolic immortality that is presented in Hal Duncan’s work of death and resurrection. These fictional stories, folklores, and myths were a hero survived death or is resurrected, place a claim to one’s own humanity in accepting the concept of death and behind these tales of the dead/rebirth is the sorrow of the living. The living is the one that is struck the most with the death of a loved one, sorrow and grief accompanies this loss and the belief of transcending death and symbolic immortality, somehow helps the living to accept this loss and allows them to move…
In “The Makropulos Case: Reflections on the Tedium of Immortality”, Bernard Williams argues that immortality is undesirable because one would achieve one’s categorical desires which will cause one to become bored and find immortality undesirable. In this paper, I will argue that this argument fails because if one lives a recognizably human life, they will experience memory decay thus allowing them to repeat the same categorical desires without becoming bored. In addition, if one must experience immortality in a recognizably human form then they and everything and everyone else around them will be, therefore giving the one with an eternal life a constant task of trying to perfect everything and everyone (mortals).…
The Immortal Life of Henrietta Lacks, by Rebecca Skloot, exposes the story of Henrietta Lacks; a black woman not only under privileged but also under medical research without her nor her family’s consent. Skloot’s approach to the Lacks family in researching and writing the novel is unethical and can be analyzed as well as supported through her leading intent for the novel, the originality of the language used, and her personal claim to ‘white privilege.’…
William James’ views about life after life death can be summed up in two words, not…
One definition of death is the the complete and permanent cessation of all vital functions in a living creature, the end if life. All philosophers agree that our earthly life in our physical form will end; however philosophers disagree on the meaning of end of life as many people agree on death as the end of our existence however while others argue that we continue in some form after death. Many ideas relating to our existence after death include; the continuation of our genes thought our descendants, immortality of the soul, resurrection of the body, reincarnation and the idea that we live on in memories of others. Many religious beliefs are based on the idea that humans possess a "soul" or "spirit" which exists independently of the body. The notion of life after death is therefore of central concern to religious believers and it is important to establish what surviving death exactly means. There are two main theories developed for the meaningful survival after death: materialism and dualism.…
“Is there life after death?” and “What will happen to me when I die?” There is life after death, but there are two different places that one can live their eternal life after death (Roman 6:23). Eternal life can be spent in Heaven or in the fire pits of Hell. God determines whether we live eternal life in Heaven or Hell; when he judges us based on our lives on earth (2 Corinthians 5:10).…
Dr. David Searls, a professor of genetics and science philosophy at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine said "Seeing death as the end of life is like seeing the horizon as the end of the ocean." i This image expresses the belief that there is more to the existence of the human spirit than our physical life on Earth.…
William Gay 's feeling about euthanasia is that the idea of Euthanasia is not the practice a lot but it is slowly gaining acceptance within our society. According to Cynics there is an increasing tendency to devalue human life, but William Gay don 't believe this is the major factor. The acceptance of Euthanasia is much more likely to be the result of unthinking gentleness and showing kindness. He wants to show that euthanasia is wrong and it is inherently wrong, but it is also wrong judged from the standpoints of self-interest and of practical effects. He defines Euthanasia as, "an essential aspect of euthanasia is that it involves taking a human life, either one 's own or that of another. Also, the person whose life is taken must be someone who is believed to be suffering from some disease or injury from which recovery cannot reasonably be expected. Finally, the action must be deliberate and intentional." Thus, euthanasia is intentionally taking the life of a presumably hopeless person. Whether the life is one 's own or that of another, the taking of it is still euthanasia.…