I liked the movie better. I personally did not really like the ending of the book. A. Square got to see the 3rd dimension, something no one except the council knew about. I thought there was going to be a big revelation at the end of the book, but instead he gets thrown into jail and basically forgotten. It was like nothing happened. Not even his grandson found out.…
The settings I imagined while reading the book were very different from what I saw in the movie. Some of the characters such as Kenny and Byron were shorter than I imagined, but Joetta was taller than I imagined her and Grandma Sands looked very different than I imagined. I thought she would be tiny, really old looking, and very mean. She wasn’t really any of those. The settings were very different such as the church and the Watsons house. I thought they would be more dated. Their house wasn’t modern, but wasn’t as old as I imagined from the context clues in the book. Overall I liked the movie better because it had more information about racism and I felt I learned more about it. I think I would like the movie even better if it had Rufus as a character, but it was still a great…
Personally, I like the book better. The movie just doesn't give enough information. It leaves out so many details from the book that it just messes up the story line. Don't get me wrong the movie was a great movie but it just wasn't good enough. It needed more details than what it had. The little details is what counts the…
LeAlan And Lloyd are best friends and reporters but they start to split since LeAlan graduated and Lloyd failed 12th grade and didn’t go to graduation with LeAlan. Also the book didn’t write about the principle thinking that LeAlan and Lloyd was saying all these bad things about the hood that was not true.The reason why I think that there are so many differences in the book and movie is because LeAlan grandmother was singing her favorite song in the movie and the book never said that she was singing her favorite song. I like the movie better because it shows more things that never happened in the book. I like the book a little bit because it shows more things that never happened in the movie. The book and movie versions of Our America have many differences such as the movie shows and tells that Duane got shot and the book never said that Duane got shot.…
The perspective showed both sides of the story-both from the whites and the Native Americans. At the beginning, they showed the whites’ point of view by showing Dunbar’s transformation and rapid-growth of understanding of the ways of the Indian’s lifestyles. The plotline and the part of romance made it more captivating for me. The part about the wild west and the ways and culture of the Native Americans were exposed and recognized. This movie taught me much about the knowledge of the Native Americans and their relationships with the white men. The movie proved that both sides-both the white and “the savages” were even when it came to abuse and misery they created for the opposing side. I would personally recommend it to anyone who has the patience to sit down and learn about the old ways of the wild west between the Native Americans and the whites. Also to all the women that appreciate a plotline with romance. This movie has received 7 Oscars, and has, in addition, been nominated for 5 more; won 3 Golden Globes, and has, in addition, been nominated for 3 more; has won one Grammy. The contribution to my knowledge toward the AP exam has immensely increased by the unbiased view and perspective toward the Native Americans, and visually a story unfold from the west and the separate viewpoints from the whites versus the…
In the novel The Namesake, by Jhumpa Lahiri, Gogol was influenced greatly by Indian culture because it made him have a closer relationship with his father by the Hindu religious practices after his death and he was able to have a traditional relationship with Moushumi. Gogol was influenced greatly by the Indian culture since it gave him an opportunity to know more about his…
Both the book and the movie are very different, they have lots of similarities and differences. The Setting, Plot and Characterisation are three parts that the book and movie can be compared.…
Some actors acted and appeared entirely different in the movie than the book. The directing and special effects were okay in some scenes, but half-baked and lousy in others. Furthermore, the characters are developed far less in the film and many semi-important scenes in the novel are excluded in the film. Do not watch this movie unless you have read the novel (or even if you have read it). If you haven’t read the book and decide to watch the movie instead, you will fail to understand the complicated relationships between each character and between the Socs and Greasers and just think the movie is substandard and all aspects of the movie lacked in action, emotion, or just seemed like they were not well thought out. A 3.5/10 may seem harsh, but I was not pleased. Just go read the book instead. It had the potential to be a great film, but severely missed the…
How does Ashima explain to herself why Ashoke had accepted the one-year fellowship in Cleveland?…
The best thing about this book by far is how the parents have persevered throughout all these events that has happened to their family. From the running away of Glen, the murder of their son Greg, the finding out that their sons Glen and Guy were gay and their contraction of HIV, and also the death of them. They had to have heavy hearts after all of this happened, and yet they still go through all the HIV campaigning to show us how dangerous this disease is. A thing I did not like about this book is that there were very little happy things that happened to this family. I also thought that it was hard to keep track of the Nakatani 's children because all of their names were so similar.…
The film has become such an important part of the American culture that there have been countless adaptations of the story. As mentioned before, this movie is important because we are able to identify with all characters and learn something about ourselves while doing so. The creation of additional films and Broadway musicals that tell this story through another character’s perspective and have also found enormous success in doing so. Not only is the movie of high quality with a strong plot line, but it is so universal that is has become woven into both the American culture due to it being a movie that appeals to…
The final scene of ‘The Namesake’ is an emotionally significant scene because of the poignant references, the language and the issues addressed. This passage clarifies the novel’s status as a “Bildungsroman”. Sympathy and affection is created for Gogol, making the tone of this final passage pensive and sentimental. It delivers the climax where Gogol is finally able to find balance in issues that had been bothering him throughout the novel. One of the key concerns dealt with in this passage is the importance of a name.…
Nothing has as profound influence on one’s identity as name. That is, one is constantly recognized by the people and by oneself with his name, and the name consciously and unconsciously keeps influencing one's identity as the name directly relates to how one perceives the world and oneself. In a novel, The Namesake, by Jhumpa Lahiri, this power of name is well depicted through the identity crisis of the son of an Indian immigrants family, the Ganguli. Gogol Ganguli, the son of Ashima and Ashoke Ganguli, struggles with his dual identity due to two different cultures in his life and, more importantly, his name. Named after his father’s beloved Russian author, he sees no identity in his name, which is neither Indian nor American nor even Russian…
In the books everything seemed to be much smoother and easier. My main thought was “how people can possibly spend their whole life together and stay in love?” specially after ending a ten year marriage only three months ago, and experiencing the big disappointment that love does not last forever.…
Dahiya adds onto this discovery as she states, “the thought of bringing up a baby in an alien land terrifies [Ashima]” (501). In an effort to decrease this fear as well as to decrease her homesickness, Ashima does everything in her power to recreate the culture she grew up with and misses when her children are born. Examples of this can be found throughout the novel, whether it be from the day Gogol is born and her husband, Ashoke, and her struggle to name him, how Ashima cooks only Indian food for her family and enrolls Gogol in Bengali lesson and forced him to go to them until he was an adult, and her insist on planning a traditional Indian wedding for Gogol. The constant Bengali dinner parties they would attend or host as a family on every Saturday is another instance where Ashima is trying to recreate her old culture for her children. For example, the dinner parties would consist of only Bengali families and friends, Bengali food, language, customs and culture. By making Gogol and Sonia go to these parties Ashima was trying to replace the family members back in Calcutta with new Bengali families in America, as well as expose them to controlled environments Ashima deemed fit for her “perfect Bengali…