The Nature of Goodwill
Synopsis
The multitude of academic literature on the nature and issues of intangible assets and goodwill have highlighted the numerous approaches to measuring and reporting goodwill. These issues of identifying and measuring goodwill have provided great challenges in communicating the relevant value for an organisation. However, they are becoming increasingly more important in an environment where goodwill and other intangible assets are making up larger components of business purchase/combination prices. In determining the correct value of goodwill in the financial statements, there are three bases of measurement in accounting that can be applied; historical cost, market value and net present value. Each method has its own costs and benefits in the application to goodwill, however these costs and benefits have concluded that there is no one superior measurement approach for goodwill. This suggests that the focus should be on the disclosure and understanding of the reported goodwill amount.
Introduction: The Nature of Goodwill
Goodwill is an unidentifiable intangible asset, which cannot be individually identified and is an intrinsic part of a business (Deegan, 2005, p.274). It cannot be sold or bought separately from the entity and may be built over a number of periods. It arises from how the physical assets and human resources of the entity have been employed within the business environment and may be attributed to factors such as market penetration, an excellent distribution network, good industrial relations and superior management (Miller, 1995, p.7). As goodwill today constitutes a much larger part of acquisition prices (Chauvin & Hirschey, 1994, p.160), it has greatly impacted on figures shown on financial statements. Thus, it is very important to be able to measure the value of goodwill correctly during the buying and selling of an entity in accordance to the “risks and benefits of the deal” (Long, 2007, p54). Historical Cost, Market Value and Net Present
The multitude of academic literature on the nature and issues of intangible assets and goodwill have highlighted the numerous approaches to measuring and reporting goodwill. These issues of identifying and measuring goodwill have provided great challenges in communicating the relevant value for an organisation. However, they are becoming increasingly more important in an environment where goodwill and other intangible assets are making up larger components of business purchase/combination prices. In determining the correct value of goodwill in the financial statements, there are three bases of measurement in accounting that can be applied; historical cost, market value and net present value. Each method has its own costs and benefits in the application to goodwill, however these costs and benefits have concluded that there is no one superior measurement approach for goodwill. This suggests that the focus should be on the disclosure and understanding of the reported goodwill amount.
Introduction: The Nature of Goodwill
Goodwill is an unidentifiable intangible asset, which cannot be individually identified and is an intrinsic part of a business (Deegan, 2005, p.274). It cannot be sold or bought separately from the entity and may be built over a number of periods. It arises from how the physical assets and human resources of the entity have been employed within the business environment and may be attributed to factors such as market penetration, an excellent distribution network, good industrial relations and superior management (Miller, 1995, p.7). As goodwill today constitutes a much larger part of acquisition prices (Chauvin & Hirschey, 1994, p.160), it has greatly impacted on figures shown on financial statements. Thus, it is very important to be able to measure the value of goodwill correctly during the buying and selling of an entity in accordance to the “risks and benefits of the deal” (Long, 2007, p54). Historical Cost, Market Value and Net Present
Bibliography: 2. Cowan, T., 1965, “A Resources Theory of Accounting”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 40, No. 1. (Jan., 1965), pp. 9-20 3. CPA Australia Accounting Handbook, 2007 4. Davies, F., Davies, P., 2005, ‘An impairment measure that’s seriously impaired’, Accountancy, Vol. 118, Issue 1238, pp.77 5. Deegan, C 6. Dunse, A, N., Hutchison, E, N., 2003, ‘Trade related valuations and the treatment of goodwill’, Journal of Property Investment and Finance, Vol. 22, No. 3, pp. 236-258 7. Egginton, D 8. Grinyer, R, J., Walker, M., Russel, A., 1990, ‘The Rational For Accounting For Goodwill’, British Accounting Review, Vol. 22, pp. 223-235 9. Gynther, Reg, S.,1996, “Some 'Conceptualizing ' on Goodwill,” Accounting Review, Vol 13. Ketz, J., 1983, “Are Constant Dollar Disclosures Informative”, Financial Analyst Journal, March/April 1983, p 52 - 55 14. Lee, B., Press, E., Choi, B, 2001, “Capital Assets and Financial Statement Distortions”, CR, Vol 15. Leibler, M. 2003, “True and Fair – an imaginary view”, Australian Accounting Review, Nov 2003; vol 13, iss 3, pp.61-66. 16. Long, C., 2007, ‘Goodwill Hunting’, Charter, Vol. 78, Iss. 4; pg. 54-55 17. McCarthy, M 20. Seetharaman, A., Balachandran, M., Saravanan, S, A., 2004, ‘Accounting treatment of goodwill: yesterday, today and tomorrow’, Journal of Intellectual Capital, Vol. 5, No. 1, pp. 131-152 21. Staubus, G 22. Walker, R. G. 2003, “Measurement: A Way Forward”, ABACUS; vol 39, no 3, pp.356-374. 23. White, L.J. and Jones, S. 1990, “Mark-to-Market Accounting: A (Not So) Modest Approach”, Financial Managers’ Statement, Jan-Feb 1990; vol.12, iss 1, pp.27-37. 24. Wiener, H. M. 1979-1980, “Going Concern Value: Goodwill by any other name?”, Tax Lawyer, Fall 1979-1980; vol 33, no 1, pp.183-197.