In the beginning of the story Madame Loisel was a really prideful person. She felt like…
She sees and has realized that having someone you love, love you back unconditionally is much more rewarding than having a diamond necklace or a big, over the top, fancy dress while Madam Loisel is sitting on her window seat sulking and complaining about all the things she doesn’t have. Nothing is ever good enough for her and she just wants more and more. She doesn’t seem to appreciate any of the many things her husband does for her, and how much he truly loves her. She doesn’t take the time and look at the things she has to be grateful for in her life, making her so much more ungrateful than…
Mathilde Loisel was a mixture of selfish,greedy and has all around pride. She was more worried about the gowns, the jewels, and herself,and living in a daydream but instead she didn't appreciate the things she had, like a beautiful home, a maid, and also a loving husband.She shows her self centered actions, her thoughtless words and her self obsessed personality.…
In “The Necklace,” GUY DE MAUPASSANT character loisel Mathilde who is a very greedy and selfish woman, believes that she was born for every delicacy and luxury there is and feels that she was made for all beautiful jewels and clothes, which cause her emotional…
On the other hand there is Madame Loisel, which is a character that just feels that it is her duty to be what the society expects of all women. She feels that she has to be in the high class, that she is worth a lot and that all because of her beauty should adore her. She also had an opinion that if she wants something she has to get it or it is the end of the world. In addition, her believe is that her just deserve, also for whom she is, expensive cloths, and expensive necklace.…
First, Mme.Loisel is a lower to middle-class women we know this because the author on page 1 it says “She was distressed at the poverty of her dwelling, at the bareness of the walls, at the shabby chairs, the ugliness of the curtains.” This shows that she hates that she is poor and that she wishes to be rich and have nice things. Another piece of evidence from the text that shows she hates being poor is when the author says “she thought of dainty dinners, of shining silverware, of tapestry that peopled the walls with ancient personages and with strange birds flying in the midst of a fairy forest.” on page 2. All of the evidence leads me to think that her flaw was her trying to be rich and not be happy with what she has and her pride.…
After the party, Madame Loisel loses the necklace, resulting in tireless work, loans, and night jobs for her and her husband in order to pay back the equivalent of the price. The couple finally succeeds when all the money is paid ten years later, only for Mathilde to discover that the necklace was ironically a fake, and worth a very small percentage of what the couple paid. The theme of this story is that an overemphasis on material wealth can shrink the spirit and leave one open to the changeability of fortune. The situational irony highlights this moral because the Loisels would never have had to exhaust themselves if Madame Loisel wasn’t so obsessed with riches and wealth. From the very beginning of the story, she wastes her time dreaming of luxuries such as fine silks, beautiful furniture, and gourmet feasts. Even when she is at Madam Forestier’s house to try on necklaces to borrow, she is never satisfied until she has seen the very best. Madame Loisel’s preoccupation with appearance clouds her judgment as well. As soon as she realizes that she has lost the necklace, she should simply come clean to Madam Forestier. Instead, she is too concerned with how her reputation will be affected, so she keeps quiet. She later pays the price for this when she discovers that the necklace is “false [and]…worth five hundred francs at most.” The life that she gets instead as punishment during the ten years in debt is even more difficult and meager than her life to begin with, which stresses how fame and fortune is so fleeting and unimportant in the scheme of…
In “The Necklace” by Guy De Maupassant, Madame Loisel should have been appreciative about her life and belongings, she instead is ungrateful and agonizes over all the imperfect things she owns. Maupassant describes Madame Loisel’s negative feelings towards her home, “She grieved over the shabbiness of her apartment… All these things, which other women of her class would…
Mathilde Loisel is not a sympathetic character in “The Necklace” because of her materialistic and selfish motives. She is not just poor financially but also in character. She is always dissatisfied with her life. Nice clothes, expensive jewelry, a beautiful house, more furniture and rich friends are the only things she loves in her life.…
Next, going down the latter known as social classes was the lower middle class; last came the prostitutes servants, and beggars. These social rankings can only further prove that materialistic possessions often played a large role in one’s social ranking and everyday lifestyle. The social ranking in nineteenth century France was based on materialistic possessions, beauty, and most of all money. During this time frame, there was a fine line of whom can associate with who because if an important person were to be spotted with a lower class that person’s status could be downgraded and that person could lose everything; this portrays how society can control people’s lives, how they live them, and who they share it with. Although there are a multitude of ideas presented in Guy De Maupassant’s short story “The Necklace” the most significant idea is that Madame Loisel is victimized and her life ruined because of the nineteenth century France…
Throughout “The Necklace,” Mathilde covets everything that other people have and she does not. Whereas Monsieur Loisel happily looks forward to having hot soup for dinner, Mathilde thinks only of the grandness of other homes and lavish table settings that she does not own. When Monsieur Loisel obtains an invitation for a party, she covets a new dress so that she can look as beautiful as the other wives as well as jewelry so that she does not look poor in comparison to them. She is so covetous of Madame Forestier’s wealth that she cannot bear to visit her, but she overcomes her angst when she needs to borrow jewelry for the party; there, her coveting is briefly sated because she gets to take one of the ornaments home with her. After the party, she covets the fur coats the other women are wearing, which highlight the shabbiness of her own wraps. This endless coveting ultimately leads to Mathilde’s downfall and, along the way, yields only fleeting happiness. It is so persistent, however, that it takes on a life of its own—Mathilde’s coveting is as much a part of her life as breathing.…
According to the Declaration of Independence, one of the rights of all people is the pursuit of happiness. People want to be happy. Unfortunately, most do not know where to find it. Most believe it to be in money or with another person, but in reality, the key to happiness lies within our perception. In Guy de Maupassant’s “The Necklace,” the belief that our happiness depends on how we view the world is proven true as Mathilde Loisel bares the consequences of greed, jealousy, and envy.…
Madame Loisel is the hero of the story, but she does not act like it. Madame Loisel thinks she is a pretty girl that should have been born into a wealthy family and married to a rich man. Instead, she let herself marry a clerk in the Ministry of Education. Massupassant shows her feelings and expensive taste when he says, “She suffered endlessly, feeling herself born for every delicacy and luxury. She suffered from the poorness of her house, from its mean walls, worn chairs, and ugly curtains.”…
At first, Moupassant has Mme. Loisel always feeling bad for herself for not being married into a better, more highly regarded family. The husband is shown to be a good man, always trying to please his wife, but to no avail. This becomes clear when the husband comes home one evening with an invitation to a very select event that he thinks will make her happy. Instead, Mme. Loisel is unappreciative and frets about how she has nothing proper to wear to such a thing. Again and again the author shows us the husband’s love and sacrifice for his wife, who is never fully satisfied.…
Most people tend to want more objects than others based on their own personal decisions they make. In “the Necklace’’ by Guy Maupassant, Madame Loisel has very low self-esteem and tries to get everyone’s approval in her life decisions. In ‘’How Much Land Does a Man Need?” by Leo Tolstoy, Pahom starts buying land and then becomes greedy wanting more land to own for himself. In “How much Land Does a Man Need?” and “The Necklace”, both characters start to be greedy and want more which makes them learn a valuable lesson from their previous decisions. Additionally, Madame Loisel wants to make people respect her based on the things she doesn’t have which puts her in a position where she has to pay for the previous decisions she made. This demonstrates my thesis because Madame Loisel doesn’t appreciate the things she has being in a middle class, so she ends up in a lower class because she was struck on trying to get what everyone had and didn’t focus on what she had in the beginning. The story states that ‘’she was unhappy as through she had married beneath her ; for women have no caste or class, their beauty , grace, and charm serving them for birth . . . . . Put the slum on a level with the highest lady in the land “(Maupassant 1). Madame Loisel wasn’t with the things she could get so with that being said she wanted to get the things others got in order to be seen as one of them and then receiving their approval. Since it shows why she became so greedy and her constant greediness ended up hurting her in the end. Furthermore, Pahom began to become determined to own the most land so he started buying all the land he could possibly find. His greediness of steady wanting more land ended being the very thing that killed him. Sometimes it’s best to best to have just enough because having too much is not always good all the time. An…