Preview

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1110 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
Running Head: THE NEGATIVE EFFECTS OF COHABITATION

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
University of Phoenix

The Negative Effects of Cohabitation
In today modern society with such high rate of divorce, many people are turning to cohabitation. With the 2000 census reporting 5.5 million cohabiting couples , up 3.2 million from 1990 ( Simmons & O’Connell, 2003), it is clear that cohabitation is a trend that needs to be further examined. Cohabitation is viewed as an attractive alternative or a stepping stone to marriage. Cohabiting partners share the belief that living together will be a way to test their compatibility. Premarital cohabitation works like test driving a car before signing the binding contract and leaving the dealership. But will you leave the dealership with a successful purchase and no regrets? Or will it be a purchase that never occurred because the test drive was not as smooth as expected? Although experts agree that “common sense suggests that premarital cohabitation should provide an opportunity for couples to learn about each other, strengthen their bonds and increase their chances for a successful marriage” (Smock, 2000, p. 6), research proves that cohabitation does not lead to a better relationship. In the contrary, cohabitation creates an unstable environment that is detrimental to the relationship and to the foundation of family. Many believe that living together before officially ‘tying the knot’ would lower the risk of divorce because by living together couples are learning more about each . As indicated in a survey by the National Survey of Families and Households, 50% of those who cohabit do so because they feel it is a way to ensure compatibility (Smock, 2000). The truth is, that the “idea that marriages preceded by cohabitation are more stable has received close to no empirical support” (Svarer, 2004, p. 524). In contrary, research has proved the complete opposite of this idea. Nock’s study in 1995 specifically found that



References: Harms, W. (2002). Research looks at cohabitation’s negative effects. The University of Chicago Chronicles, 19(11) Nock, S. L. (1995). A comparison of marriages and cohabiting relationships. Journal of Family Issues, 16(1), 53-76. Simmons, T., & O’Connell M Smock, P. J. (2000). Cohabitation in the united states: An appraisal of research themes, findings, and implications. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 1-20. Stafford, L., Kline, S Svarer, M. (2004). Is your love in vain? another look at premarital cohabitation and divorce. The Journal of Human Resources, 39(2), 523-535. Woods, L

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Your life can set up a disaster or can make it worth so much. In David Popenoe and Barbara Dafoe Whitehead’s article “The State of Our Union,” the topic of marriage and divorce are discussed. This paper shows and discusses the chances of divorce, the statistics on cohabitation, and economic benefits of being married. This paper is a summary of the article. This topic is important because it affects our everyday lives (Popenoe and Whitehead 390-402).…

    • 654 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Harmful Effects of Divorce are Exaggerated. Barabara Ehrenreich. Current Controversies: Marriage and Divorce.Ed. Tamara L. Roleff and Mary E. Williams. San Diego: Greenhaven Press, 1997.…

    • 1771 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    As stated in our text, various factors can bind married couples together, such as economic interdependencies, legal, social and moral constraints, relationship, and amongst other things. In the recent years some of these factors have diminished their strengths. The modern generation sees marriage in a different perspective altogether. Individuals today feel they are stable independently, they do not need to rely on their spouse for emotional or financial support. Many are career driven and soar to conquer their dreams over settling down with a family. Such untraditional views have increased divorce rates.…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Neil does bring in some premises that are relevant to that. Neil brings up some states showing that children born to cohabiting parents experience separation of their parents before the age of “16” at “75%” compared to those married at around “one third” . If it was demonstrated that a separation of parents lead to a negative impacts in a child’s life and behavior then the premise might stand. Unfortunately since so few cohabiting couples decide to have children that the net parent separation rate bellow 16% is probably higher for married couples. Neil states that women are more likely to face “physical and sexual abuse” when living in cohabitation compared to a marriage. Neil fails to bring any stats or proof to that claim or anything thing showing that cohabitation is the cause and not just in correlation. An argument is made that relationships will not be as good as married relationships because the partners will not be “genuine and authentic” due to the thinking that “their partner may bolt at the first sign of trouble.” One could rebut that be not having this security would make both partners put more effort into maintaining the relationship due to the fact that they know their partner can leave much more easily. I find it hard to believe that married people are “emotionally, physically, financially, and vocationally” better off because the apparent studies are not listed and we are not informed in what way those statistics were…

    • 1030 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the past forty years marriage, divorce and cohabitation rates have fluctuated significantly. For example, the number of divorces has increased from 27,000 in 1961 to 153,000 by 2006, whilst the Telegraph newspaper reported that ‘one in six people are cohabiting as marriage rates decline’. Why is this? There are multiple reasons for these varying statistics.…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In order to assess reasons for the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation; it is necessary to first establish the term marriage and cohabitation. Marriage is traditionally conceived to be a legally recognized relationship, between two consenting adults, that carries certain rights and obligations. Cohabitation is an arrangement whereby couples who are not legally married live together in partnership within the common law. Cohabitation has become so widespread that the term itself is now rarely used. I will now critically examine the changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so.…

    • 929 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Identify and explain two reasons for the increase in cohabitation in the contemporary UK (17)…

    • 606 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Mr Josh Gallagher

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Examine the reasons for changes in the patterns of marriage and cohabitation in the last 40 years or so:…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Over the last 40 years marriage rates have declined significantly while the number of couple’s cohabitating has risen rapidly. This is due to our changing society where equality, laws, social acceptance and religions have all contributed into the way we view marriage and relationships. In the 1970’s there were around 400,000 first marriages whereas, in 2011, there were 248,000. The average ages of people getting married have also increased from 25 for men and 23 for women in 1961 to 36 for men and 33 for women in 2011. Cohabitation is a big factor in the decreasing number of marriages with people using it as either an alternative to marriage entirely, or a ‘trial marriage’ which just delays the time of a couple’s marriage.…

    • 918 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    One reason is changing social attitudes. Religion regarded cohabitation as ‘living in sin’, but today there is less shame attached to it. Barlow et al found increasing acceptance of cohabitation. This shows that the change in religions social attitude, cohabitation is accepted more, leading to an increase in cohabitation. Some people prefer love that focuses of on intimacy, closeness and emotion rather than the duties of marriage. Giddens argues that there has been a trend towards confluent love. This love focuses on the intimacy, closeness and emotion of a relationship, rather than the feelings of obligation and duty that is in vows at marriage. When a marriage no longer has confluent love, the relationship is likely to end. This shows that monogamy may start being replaced by serial monogamy, in which cohabitation is most suited to. However, the ONS found that 60% of cohabiting couples will eventually end in marriage showing that monogamy can often replace serial monogamy. There is less pressure to follow traditional norms and values. Beck and Beck-Gernshiem argue that individualism has led to changing attitudes towards cohabitation and marriage. There is less pressure to follow the norms and values around love and relationships set by family, religion or culture. This shows that the change in attitudes has led to people making their own decision about whether they marry or cohabitate. The acceptance of sex outside marriage has made it more likely that cohabitation will occur. Allan and Crow argue that effective contraception has made it possible for partners to cohabit without fear of pregnancy. This alongside the acceptance of sex before marriage means cohabitation without marriage is likely to occur. This shows that the change in social attitudes towards sex outside of marriage has led to an increase in cohabitation.…

    • 585 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Turner, R. “Rising Prevalence of Cohabitation In United States May have Partially Offset Decline in Marriage Rates.” Family Planning Perspectives 22.2 (1990): 90-91. CINAHL with Full Text. Web. 1 Oct. 2012…

    • 825 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Wilson argued that the main problem with cohabitation is that people can just walk away. Therefore the custody of any children the union produced could be decided by one person up and leaving. Financially everything is typical split and offers no reason to stay together. Both partners in the relationship live in a constant fear of the other leaving. He states that the majority of people who choose to cohabit instead of marry are women who have carriers and lazy men who don’t want responsibility (Wilson).…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Wallerstein, J., Lewis, J., & Blakeslee, S. (2000). The Unexpected Legacy of Divorce: A 25 Year Landmark Study. New York: Delacorte Press.…

    • 1722 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Cohabitation has increased as well, as there has been a decline in stigma attached to it. Couples may decide to live together before considering marriage and children. The younger generation is more likely to accept cohabitation than older generations, this is linked to one of the Rapoport’s family diversities, generational diversity.…

    • 449 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Benefits of Healthy Marriages for Children and Youth-Author unknown (2010) Retrieved June 10, 2010, from http://www.acf.hhs.gov/healthymarriage/benefits/index.html…

    • 763 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays

Related Topics