It had to be stressful, saddening embarrassment, …show more content…
All of this happened to the tax collectors. The colonists didn't like the stamp act, or that they didn't get a vote on it. The colonists didn't even get to vote for their tax collector. So what's their solution, be heard. For some that meant peaceful riots, but for others, they resorted to violence. The people that resorted to violence put out a message that we don't like the stamp act. But the way they put that message out there also said that we are dangerous and that you should fear us. I doubt that was one of the messages they wanted to be thought of, but who wouldn't be scared of people that burn down people's houses, that threaten people, etc. Then the people that did peaceful riots put out the message that they disliked the stamp act, but they didn't strike fear into the British in the process. Evidence I have of this is in an article called Origin and Progress of the American Rebellion by Peter Oliver: "The mob, also, on the same evening, broke into the Office of the Register of the Admiralty & did considerable damage there; but were prevented from utter destruction of it." (Oliver, excerpt). Another quote that shows there were peaceful riots, "The colonists created a somewhat more peaceful protest by organizing the Stamp Act Congress." I am a bit surprised that when it comes to messages that we try to get out in the world we have not changed when it comes to violent