The Pankhurst And The War Dbq Analysis

Atkinson's view can be seen as objective as she did not definitively state that the vote was granted solely because of the war. She includes in her arguments that "The Coalition Government, which took office in 1915, were more 'pro suffrage' than Asquith's party. In (lines 5-8), Atkinson even mentions that Lloyd George(1863-1945), who succeeded the former Prime Minister in 1917, after Asquith's resignation, was more "sympathetic" towards women's cause. George had become Minister of munitions by 1915, and realising the drastic reduction in the country's work force by 1915, collaborated with Emmeline Pankhurst and the WSPU to support the war effort. On July 17, 1915, they staged a mass rally known as "The Great Procession of Women" or "The
The Pankhurst and the War(2003, p. 109). Atkinson asserts in lines ( 9-10), "The fact that women had played an important role in the war effort, made it easier for politicians to support a bill". Here we see that Diane Atkinson's stance gives credit to politicians' sympathy in acknowledging women's participation in World War One. It is therefore safe to say, that Diane Atkinson is of the view that women's participation in the war, is the main factor to finally tip the scale in the women's direction, gaining favour in the eyes of politicians hence, influencing government in 1918, to grant women over thirty the vote. Not to mention Diane Atkinson , in the early years of suffrage, was against women having the
Although this petition was defeated, as like the Third Reform Bill of 1884, it was their strategies that first brought the need for franchise to the fore, agitating the need for the need for suffrage. In 1905, a huge meeting was held in protest of this act, and since then, the Suffragettes began employing more vicious strategies like heckling government ministers, breaking windows and initiating hunger strikes in prison amongst other terrible things. The New Book of Knowledge(Vol. 7., p 3330). Not all women from the movement believed in adopting such radical actions. Millicent Fawcett maintained that the women stick to their original concept of peaceful and respectable demeanour, and peaceful rallying , which she believed, would gradually wear government down. and were considered to be of more positive construct compared to the more militant movement of the Pankhursts. Pugh believes that the vote to support women's suffrage was inevitable, mainly because of these earlier endeavours, which had already started to challenge certain cemented male dominance ideologies. He continues to admonish, "...While hypocritically paying fulsome to their war works..." Lines 2-3). Martin Pugh considers Asquith, whose position was, "The natural distinction of sex, which admittedly differentiates the functions of men and women in many departments of human activity,