Preview

The People of the State of New York V. Howard Sohn, 43 A.D. 2d 716, 350 N.Y.S 2d 198 (1973)

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
522 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The People of the State of New York V. Howard Sohn, 43 A.D. 2d 716, 350 N.Y.S 2d 198 (1973)
Alexandra Trogisch September 4, 2006
Legal Research and Writing Annamaria Maciocia, Esq.

Citation:

The People of the State of New York v. Howard Sohn,
43 A.D. 2d 716, 350 N.Y.S 2d 198 (1973)

Procedural History:

This is an appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered February 14, 1973, convicting him of assault in the second degree, after a nonjury trial, and sentencing him to probation for five years.

Facts:

The complainant pleaded guilty to possession of a pistol during the incident. A finding that the appellant and his codefendants were the aggressors is inconsistent with the fact they called the police and remained on the scene until their arrival.

Issue:

Is the defendant guilty beyond a reasonable doubt? Is the appellant the aggressor beyond a reasonable doubt?

Holding:

The evidence failed to establish guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Rationale:

The People failed to meet their burden of proving guilt beyond a reasonable doubt.

Disposition:

Judgment reversed, on the law and the facts as a matter of discretion in the interests of justice, and indictment dismissed.

Citation:

Thomas Walsh v. Town of Cheektowaga, 237 A.D.2d 947, 654 N.Y.S.2d 912 (1997)

Procedural History:

This is an appeal from the Order of Supreme Court, Erie County.

Facts:

In the early morning hours of September 18, 1992, a police officer employed by defendant Town of Cheektowaga pulled over an automobile owned by plaintiff's decedent, Jacqueline Walsh. An acquaintance of Walsh was driving and she was a passenger. As the result of the traffic stop, the acquaintance was placed under arrest for driving while intoxicated. Based upon his observations of Walsh, the officer determined that Walsh was also intoxicated and unable to drive safely. The officer testified that he offered to call a cab or give Walsh a ride to any destination she chose, but Walsh

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Central NY Basketball, Inc. v. Barnett (181 N.E.2d 506, Ct. C.P. Cuyahoga Cty. OH 1961…

    • 440 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    After defendant checked Taylor’s driving record and contacted his references they had no reason to believe that Taylor would not be a safe driver. Additionally, the defendant specifically instructs its drivers to stay on the interstate and stop only for emergencies to service the truck and to eat and sleep. Drivers were to sleep in the truck’s sleeping compartment at rest areas or truck stops on the interstate. Defendant’s inquiry into Taylor’s driving record, and past employment information constituted reasonable care in making their hiring decision where the job duties involved minimum contact between the employee and other persons. Taylor’s actions involving his attack on plaintiff were outside the scope of his employment. Therefore, the defendant is not liable to the…

    • 474 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Facts: This case deals with the defendant Patrick Knowles; who was stopped in Newton, Iowa for driving 20 miles over the speed limit. The police officer at the time pulled Knowles over and issued him a ticket, but under the Iowa Code the officer could have arrested the individual. After writing Knowles a ticket the officer searched the vehicle, where under the driver’s seat he found a pipe that could be used to smoke Marijuana and a small bag of marijuana. Upon finding these two items Knowles was arrested and charged with having a controlled substance. At pre-trial, Knowles moved to suppress the marijuana and pipe from court. He claimed that the search was a violation of his rights and that…

    • 402 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Facts: In October of 1970, the defendant, her boyfriend, and two other people drove near the area of St. Ignatius Retreat Home. The defendant was a passenger and to her understanding, they were headed for Christopher Morely…

    • 396 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    History: A motion of summary was given after the U.S. District court of New York saw the case.…

    • 981 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case: Goldberg, Commissioner of Social Services of the City of New York v. Kelly et al. (1970)…

    • 787 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Case Brief - R. v. Hufsky

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The appellant was found guilty in provincial court for refusing to comply with the officer’s demand S. 234.1 (2)…

    • 691 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Virginia vs Moore

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages

    An en banc decision reinstated Moore’s conviction. This group of judges held that although his arrest violated Virginia’s arrest statutes, exclusion of evidence was not the remedy because the Fourth Amendment’s requirement for probable cause was satisfied. Moore appealed to Virginia’s Supreme Court after this. The Supreme Court overturned the conviction on the grounds of the arrest was unlawful and there was no right to search Moore. There were several other cases that were used and helped Moore. Two of them that the court used were Knowles v. Iowa and United States…

    • 470 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF ILLINOIS, ex rel. MICHAEL O'CONNELL v. ROBERT TURNER, Superintendent of the Reform School of the City of Chicago.…

    • 2639 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    In answer to the defendant's assertion in his affidavit of errors that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated, the return of the court merely asserted that the right to a speedy trial did not apply to a traffic infraction. This assertion is incorrect, since the constitutional right to a speedy trial applies to all prosecutions (People v Wertheimer, NYLJ, June 5, 1986, at 15, col 5 [App Term, 2d & 11th Jud Dists]). Although a constitutional speedy trial claim is not waived by a guilty plea, it must be asserted in the court below in order to preserve the issue for appellate review as a matter of law (People v Jordan, 62 N.Y.2d 825; People v Blakely, 34 N.Y.2d 311). In view of the failure of the return to give any factual data regarding defendant's claim, it cannot be known for certain whether defendant made any motion to dismiss on this ground. Even it he did not, however, it is our opinion, in view of his pro se status, that the matter should be reviewed in the interests of justice (CPL 170.40; People v Williams, 151 A.D.2d 795, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 744; People v Walker, 141 A.D.2d 991, 992, lv denied 72 N.Y.2d 962). In doing so, we conclude that an unexplained delay of over two years in bringing a simple traffic…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Case Brief People V Green

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Procedural History: This case was appealed by the defendant to the California Court of Appeal; Second District after a trial court convicted the defendant on 12 felony offenses. The California Court of Appeals upheld the conviction of the trial court.…

    • 417 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Superior Court ruled that the appeal should be allowed, and that this evidence should be considered inadmissible since the accused chose not to make any statements - he was practicing his right to remain silent. The police violated his right under s. 7 of the Charter by tricking him into opposing his decision, which then made the trial unjust. An undercover police officer must serve the purpose of observation of suspects, rather than actively drawing out evidence or information in violation of the person’s right to remain silent. Seeing as the statements were the only piece of evidence the Crown had in order to be able to prove the individual guilty, it’s evident that under the current conditions, it’s the admission of the evidence rather…

    • 138 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Tennessee V Garner

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Edward Garner’s father chose to sue not only the officer who shot and killed his son, but also the police department who employed him, the director of the police department, city, and even the mayor at the time (FindLaw, n.d.). The lawsuit was filed for violating Garner’s civil rights. The initial ruling denied Mr. Garner’s motion and found in favor of each of the defendants (FindLaw, n.d.). Later, Garner’s father appealed, and this time, the courts ruled in favor of him, both reversing and remanding the case (FindLaw, n.d.).…

    • 1113 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Murder Manslaughter Facts

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages

    [ 4 ]. Reed, A. & Fitzpatrick, B., 2006. Criminal Law. 3rd ed. London: Sweet & Maxwell. p40…

    • 2291 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Briefs of 100 leading cases in the law enforcement. Cincinnati: Anderson Publishing Company. Weber, B. (1993, April 3).…

    • 2183 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays