Preview

The Primary Motivations of Both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. during the Early Decades of the Cold War Conflict

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3367 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Primary Motivations of Both the U.S. and the U.S.S.R. during the Early Decades of the Cold War Conflict
There are competing interpretations of which side was primarily to blame for the long duration of the Cold War. Analyze the primary motivations of both the US and the USSR during the early decades of the Cold War conflict.
___________________________________________________________________________

The Cold War is the name given to the period between 1945, the end of the Second World War, and 1991, the date of the collapse of the Soviet Union and is used to describe a period of stand-off between the USA and the USSR – a cold war being fought by all means short of international armed conflict – who are often described as the ‘superpowers’. Over the past 60 years historians have disagreed over the origins of the conflict, most notably over the question of who was to blame for the breakdown in American-Soviet relations. At the end of the 1940-1945 conflict the alliance of the ‘Big Three’, the USA, the British Empire and the Soviet Union, had emerged victorious yet by the 1950s the Western Powers were at loggerheads with the USSR and remained so until the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991. The first round of the debate was between the ‘traditionalists’ or ‘orthodox’ historians and the ‘revisionists’. This was followed by an attempt to produce a synthesis of their arguments now generally known as ‘post-revisionism’. These various attempts to revise the historiography of the Cold War have largely resulted from new sources becoming available to each succeeding school of thought. The traditionalists were dependent on unclassified material (much of official archive still being classified in the first decade of the Cold War), public papers, ongoing US foreign policy and personal experience1. In the early 1970s revisionist scholars benefited from the emergence of American foreign policy documents and recordings like those President John F. Kennedy made of the meetings of the Executive Committee of the National Security Council at the time of the Cuban



Bibliography: Professor Ernest R. May (Harvard) John F. Kennedy and the Cuban Missile Crisis URL: http://BBC/history/coldwar [accessed 3.3.2012 - last updated 17.2.2011] John Kent (LSE) Cold War and the Periphery URL: http://www.history.ac.uk/ihr/focus/cold/articles [accessed 5.3.2012] William Dudley Opposing viewpoints in World History : The Cold War URL: http://www.e-notes.com/cold-war-article [accessed 5.3.2012] Tony Judt Postwar: A History of Europe since 1945 William Heinemann London 2005 John Lewis Gaddis The emerging Post-Revisionist Synthesis on the Origins of the Cold War URL: http://eaglepoint.lexingtonchristian.org/hs/kconfor%20History/Revisionist%20Cold%20War.Gaddis.pdf Bodgan Antoniu (Romania) The Origins of the Cold War: A Historiographical Review URL: http://ebooks.unibuc.ro/StintePol/euro-atlanticstudies.pdf E. Hobsbawm The Age of Extremes: The Short Twentieth Century 1914 – 1991 Abacus 2003

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Gaddis Cold War Summary

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gaddis re-examines the Cold War with new information from all around the globe, creating a “new” cold war history. Gaddis pinpoints the start of the Cold War as 1947 and notes “the regime, personality, and ideological explanations for the Cold War point to an underlying defensive motivation: the need to expand and assert control to save Stalin and the Soviet Union.” (Lebow, p.628) Gaddis also sustains that Stalin’s personality and paranoia influenced events. It seems the “new” cold war history is actually the same as the “old” cold war standpoint because Gaddis concluded: “who then was responsible [for the Cold War]? The answer, I think, is authoritarianism in general, and Stalin in particular.” (Gaddis, p.294)…

    • 320 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Relations between the USA and Soviet Union underwent dramatic change in the years 1943-47. This is clearly demonstrated by the fact that they had gone from allies during the Second World War to a rivalry which went onto dominate the latter part of the twentieth century and world politics, in a period known as the Cold War. This essay therefore hopes to analyse the key reasons that led to this breakdown in relations by looking chronologically at the long-term distrust suffered by nations, the growing and conflicting differences between Capitalism and Communism, the Soviet Expansion into Eastern Europe, the atomic bomb and finally the Marshall Plan in 1947.…

    • 312 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    There is a great disparity amongst historians when discussing the point at which the Cold War began. Many begin their analysis of the Cold War in 1945, when the Allied forces overcame Germany. This is a widely accepted catalyst for the start of the Cold War, and indeed, a very important moment for the Allies. It was not, however, where the tensions between the Soviets and the United States began. This essay will discuss how fundamental ideological differences between the two superpowers existed long before the conclusion of the Second World War.…

    • 1181 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    THE ORIGINS OF THE COLD WAR

    • 5062 Words
    • 20 Pages

    The Cold War has often been seen as an ideological struggle between two mutually incompatible systems: capitalism and communism. Though this is a vast over-simplification, ideology did play a role. Ambrose and Brinkley certainly see its significance: “ideology cannot be ignored. Men like Truman, Harriman and Kennan were appalled by Russian brutality and Communist denial of the basic Western freedoms”.…

    • 5062 Words
    • 20 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Three Paradigms of Cold War

    • 8015 Words
    • 33 Pages

    The Cold War is not what it once was. Not only has the conflict itself been written about in the past tense for more than a decade, but historians’ certainties about the character of the conflict have also begun to blur. The concerns brought on by trends of the past decade – such trifles as globalization, weapons proliferation, and ethnic warfare – have made even old strategy buffs question the degree to which the Cold War ought to be put at the center of the history of the late twentieth century. In this article I will try to show how some people within our field are attempting to meet such queries by reconceptualizing the Cold War as part of contemporary international history. My emphasis will be on issues connecting the Cold War – defined as a political conflict between two power blocs – and some areas of investigation that in my opinion hold much promise for reformulating our views of that conflict, blithely summed up as ideology, technology, and the Third World. I have called this lecture “Three (Possible) Paradigms” not just to avoid making too presumptuous an impression on the audience but also to indicate that my use of the term “paradigm” is slightly different from the one most people have taken over from Thomas Kuhn’s work on scientific revolutions. In the history of science, a paradigm has come to mean a comprehensive explanation, a kind of scientific “level” that sustains existing theory until overtaken by a new and different paradigm. In the history of human societies, I would venture, the term paradigm must take on a slightly different meaning, closer, in fact, to how the term was generally used before Kuhn’s work in the early s. For our purpose, I want to look at paradigms as patterns of interpretation, which may possibly exist side by side, but which each signify a particular…

    • 8015 Words
    • 33 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    How Did the Cold War Begin

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Maus, Derek C. (2003). Turning Points in World History: The Cold War. Michigan: Greenhaven Press…

    • 2700 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Warner, Geoffrey. "The Cold War In Retrospect." International Affairs 87.1 (2011): 173-184. Academic Search Complete. Web. 7 Nov. 2012.…

    • 1377 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Three people were interviewed regarding their knowledge of the cold war for the purposes of this paper. The names of the interviewees are Brandon Fields, Douglas Fields and Cassondra Ward Regis. Brandon Fields, age 25 and Douglas Fields, age 57 are family members who live back home in Richmond Virginia and Cassondra Ward, age 30, is a co-worker who lives in Alexandria, Virginia. The only interviewee who could remember a full phrase from the Cold War was Cassondra. She quotes JFK’s A wall is a whole lot better than a war phrase. She stated that “This…

    • 363 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fry, Andy. World War II and the Early Cold War. UNLV History 102, [video online] [Accessed: 03/06/2013].…

    • 2197 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Origins of the Cold War

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages

    This paper tries to compare and contrast two articles on the Cold War that give two different perspectives on the events that happened. One is Arthur Schlesinger’s “The Origins of the Cold War”, and the other is Christopher Lasch’s article “The Cold War, Revisited and Revisioned”. These articles represent the same historical events interpreting them through two opposite perspectives – the orthodox American view that states that the Cold War was the “brave and essential response of free men to communist aggression” (Schlesinger, p.477) in Eastern Europe and the revisionist perspective that states that the USA abandoned the policy of collaboration and undertook a course of aggression to expel Russian influence from Eastern Europe. This paper will provide evidence that the Cold War did not result from a Soviet attempt of expansion in Europe. It was just the only possible result from the clash of interests between the two greatest powers after World War II – USA and the Soviet Union – the first one aggressively trying to promote capitalism throughout Europe, and the second one aiming at…

    • 1874 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Many historians argue that the development of the cold war in the years 1945-48 owed more to soviet expansionism than to the USA’s economic interests. Source 7 supports this view to an extent as it argues that the USSR ‘tightened its grip over the countries of central and eastern Europe’ and how the ‘western attitudes had hardened’ due to this. However source 8 disagrees with source 7 completely as it suggests that there were ‘important economic advantages for the USA in starting a cold war’. Source 9 rejects the view of both sources as it acknowledges the need for Stalin’s need for security and that there was a ‘wedge’ driven into ‘soviet security’.…

    • 779 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The formal plan of study is stated in the timeline given below. The main focus of the review will be to understanding and assessing one of the seminal events in modern world history. The review will provide a broad interpretive overview offering a general account of the Cold war. I will be making notes for my final draft with a regular study of the book covering all the relevant chapters in accordance with the theme of the course. I shall submit the final review by the date mentioned in the handout. The review process will be done by first reading the chapters and then joining the notes prepared for each chapter into a meaningful text thus covering the objectives of the review.…

    • 349 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Cold War was not a typical war. Although it was a war, it didn’t include fighting. This war lasted for a tremendous period of forty-two years. It was a conflict between the United States and the Soviet Union. This war consists of many lows and highs throughout the length of forty-two years.…

    • 489 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Orthodox interpretation of the origins of the Cold War notes that expansionary tendencies of the Soviet Union as a primary influence of the outbreak of the Cold War. According to the Orthodox interpretation, the quintessential wisdom among American politicians and diplomats at the time was that Soviet Union after the end of the World War II, sought to expand its area of hegemonic control. Scholars like George F. Kennen, William H. McNeill, Herbert Feis and Arthur M. Schlesinger shared similar point of interpretive through their narratives which subsequently characterised the orthodox thesis of the Cold War.…

    • 429 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    For nearly fifty years, the world lived in fear as two super-power nations quietly battled for power, respect and popularity of their respective political views. The Cold War arose out of the ashes of the failed alliance between the United States and the Soviet Union in World War II. Many different factors could be linked to the actual cause of the Cold War, however many agree that the political future of Eastern Europe was the major spark that ignited the battle between Communist Russia and Capitalist America1. The American fear of the spread of communism and their ambition to penetrate the "Iron Curtain" only added fuel to the fire that had been burning for some time already. Although the causes are too numerous to get into detail, the effects were felt throughout the world, not only just in the US and Russia. The effects of the struggle can still be seen in today's culture, and are prominent at that. Hence, although many lives were lost, millions of dollars were spent and resources expended2, the Cold War "benefited" some more than others, mainly "benefiting" North America and Europe, while Latin America still seems to be suffering the consequences of becoming involved with the war. However, if one were to ask who "won" the war, it is near impossible to answer, as the negatives of the situation far outweigh the positives.…

    • 2230 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays