Lisa Hart is referring to the Freedom of Information Act, FOIA, which requires the federal government agencies to release records to the public. The information must not fall into one of nine exempted FOIA categories. Hart is correct in assuming that the EPA should allow her access to the documents because they are a government agency and the documents she is requesting do not fall under one of the nine exemptions.…
The federal Privacy Act 1988 is designed to promote the protection of individuals’ privacy in Australia by imposing obligations on those who collect and handle personal information to manage it responsibly and transparently. It does so by reference to a number of principles known as the Australian Privacy Principles. These principles are similar to those found in other jurisdictions such as Canada and Europe.…
Identity theft is when someone steals another person’s identity through the internet. The identity stolen can be personal information such as account names and security numbers to use it for their own benefit. For example, a Facebook user can steal another Facebook user’s personal details by either hacking or visiting their profile, uploading their profile picture, gaining personal details and using it to create a fake account of that Facebook…
When considering the part in 1984, in which Winston was considering renting Mr. Charrington’s room in order to feel privacy. Do the inner Party members, such as Big Brother get to experience their own privacy? In addition, are they allowed to have their own individualism or will they be accused of…
The USA Patriot Act of 2001 is legislation that was sponsored by President Bush and his administration following September 11th. It is to allow increased responsibilities for the criminal justice system and other agencies. “The USA Patriot Act has ten sections or titles outlining new powers for government operations.” (White 2014 p. 393) “Title II, designed to improve surveillance. Grands authority to federal law enforcement agencies to intercept communications about terrorism, allows searches of computers, allows intelligence agencies to share information with criminal justice agencies, explains procedures for warrants, creates new definitions of intelligence, allows for roving wiretaps, and provides for expanding intelligence gathering.”…
The Fourth Amendment should not be taken lightly, when invading the privacy of people. For example, people do not need a warrant to retrieve a person’s document that they have already shared with someone. Consequently, personal information could be stolen, but these people are unaware that their individual material is being searched through, and is being kept in storage. Likewise, Daniel Zwerdling states that, since Facebook uses specific software that has the ability to recognize people in pictures, this invades people’s privacy. Because of this software, anyone can observe a picture of someone and automatically know who they are. In fact, according to David Sirota, the government does not trust people enough that they have to seize a person’s…
"The American people are beginning to realize that this piece of legislation poses a threat to our God-given freedoms protected by the U.S. Constitution."…
When it comes to protecting and saving lives of the American people, private invasion used in order to locate and capture potential terrorist should be unlimited. The 911 attack has provided active proof to the American peoples of the damage that terrorist groups can impose on our society. Therefore, invading the privacy of individuals may prevent future terrorist attacks.…
Yasha Harari once said, “As the Internet grows, the choice of massive online social networks dwindles, and with it, your right to keep private your psycho pink bunny outfit pics.” That may sound ridiculous but it’s very true. The government has been trying more and more different ways to introduce regulations to ensure the security of the internet. The current bill is CISPA, which was defeated once before. It has been returned completely unchanged and is so far being carried through. With all the amazing advancements in the technology we use to share information, that’s understandable. But are they going about it in the right way? Recently there have been pieces of legislation introduced like ACTA, SOPA, and PIPA that have had mixed responses from the public, and so far the opposition has been strongest. There are many who believe that these bills are doing more bad than good, particularly in the area of online privacy.…
“ I cannot in good conscience allow the U.S. government to destroy privacy, internet freedom and basic liberties for people around the world with this massive surveillance machine they are secretly building.”-(Edward Snowden). The ideals of our government rely on the hands of the current president who presides in the oval office to this day, Donald J. Trump. What can truly be done about the lies, deceitfulness, and soon to be Orwellian site in the eyes of the current president of the U.S of A. Notably, the broadcasting system of the live television in which shows the reality, in terms of what the public already knows. Far as media coverage, those who speak the news must need a sense of urgency towards current time of day or night. Can the public…
September 11, 2001 marked a catastrophic change not only in American society but in every western state including Canada. The terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon have had a ripple effect, spreading to the entire world and terrifying thousands of people. Following these attacks, world populations were devastated and governments faced a never-before seen need to make laws governing this new form of terror. Countries like the United States of America, United Kingdom, and Canada have passed anti-terrorism legislations that define “terrorism” and how to respond and prevent such attacks.…
The Fourth Amendment protects against illegal search and seizures. This means that a U.S. citizen cannot have themselves, homes and/or possessions searched or confiscated by law enforcement without a legal warrant. It pretty much protects citizen’s privacy. But there are positive and negative effects from this. It protects the citizen’s from law enforcement from searching on the spot without legal documentation authorizing it. On the other hand, thou, it could help criminals dispose of evidence while a judge signs a warrant. The magistrate or judge issues the warrants for arrest and search and seizure not the police officer.…
Privacy is Utterly Dead Peter Singer is the Ira W. DeCamp Professor at Princeton University and the University of Melbourne that studies Bioethics, Philosophy and Public Ethics. His essay “Visible Man: Ethics in a World without Secrets” focuses on transparency and personal privacy. One can see after reading this essay, Singer is in favor of openness, but he also notes that the government misuses these technologies by having sousveillance and surveillance cameras. A person needs to understand how privacy, surveillance and sousveillance is defined to understand why he was in favor of openness.…
There has been a lot of controversy surrounding the events involving Edward Snowden. He was the contract employee who worked for the National Security Administration (NSA) who leaked classified material to the public through video interviews. In his defense, he claimed that he took the role of whistleblower to inform the public of how the U.S. government was violating citizen’s rights to privacy. With NSA resources at his disposal, Snowden appropriated classified documents supporting his claim. He then fled to Hong Kong and began releasing classified information to the media. His reason for leaving was largely based on fear of retaliation from the U.S. government. However, Edward Snowden took a job under false pretenses and intended to…
The fourth amendment states that unreasonable searches or seizures are prohibited unless they have a warrant. the fourth amendment grew directly out o the colonists experience of unreasonable searches of there privacy and personal property. Even the king did not have the authority to search his peoples homes although government agents were allowed to search homes if the reason was lawful and they had a warrant. My family thinks this amendment is very important because of whats happening right now with the internet and individual surveillance. its more important than ever. The controversy is that the NSA and commercial (i.e. google) surveillance are eroding our privacy. I think the whole thing with the NSA seeing our emails is really creepy.…