Jim is shorter than Kevin, and Lonna is less attractive than Merilyn. Research shows that compared with taller men and more attractive individuals, Jim will likely make less income and Lonna will receive poorer performance reviews and a lower salary. Appearance-based discrimination has been barred by…
Another argument Cohen brings up is that retailers hire based on looks because it is smart and necessary. In the article “Going for the Look, but Risking Discrimination” by Steven Green gives a great example about Elizabeth Nill. She walks into Abercrombie stores and almost every time managers walk up to her and offer her a job. This proves that retailers hire only attractive people. This is discrimination because Abercrombie is only hiring white, attractive people. This leaves them vulnerable for criticism from the public.…
Hiring for looks is old news in some industries, as cocktail waitresses, strippers and previous generations of flight attendants know all too well. But many companies have taken that approach to sophisticated new heights in recent years, hiring workers to project an image.…
People who argue ‘There are some reasons that an attractive person is treated better’ because attractive people know how to express themselves and be more positive than unattractive people. There are support reasons that attractive people could grow up in that way because they did not be hurt or treated badly from other people. There is some truth in it. I don’t want to reject this point of view because when I look around, people who are not fit on beauty standard what society tells are usually gloomy, shy and passive. Nonetheless, this reasons cannot justify the…
Needless to say, countless people owe their professional and financial success to their charmingly good looks. It’s a well-known fact that being attractive gets you through the door in most social settings. Society should start making more image conscious campaigns promoting self love and demonstrating that beauty isn’t…
Through my reading and interpretation of this essay, I’ve come to realize that there will always be discrimination because of how a person looks, acts, and presents themselves, but I don’t think there should be a reason for individuals to get so distraught over the issue. Although looks and physical appearance shouldn’t be something one person should judge another over, I firmly believe there are certain standards for particular situations, and we, as people, should come to understand that. When Rhode brought forward the issue with the waitress being denied a larger uniform due to health issues, I felt sorry for her, almost to the point of pity. But the more I thought about it, the more I realized that the casino, just like any other business, had a certain image to uphold, and they had a certain standard for the way their employees should look and portray themselves. And even though she had a legitimate reason why she gained some weight, the waitress signed a contract with the casino which required her to keep an “hourglass figure” (247).…
In the 19th century, many American cities banned public appearances by "unsightly" individuals. A Chicago ordinance was typical: "Any person who is diseased, maimed, mutilated, or in any way deformed, so as to be an unsightly or disgusting subject . . . shall not . . . expose himself to public view, under the penalty of a fine of $1 for each offense." Although the government is no longer in the business of enforcing such discrimination, it still allows businesses, schools and other organizations to indulge their own prejudices. Over the past half-century, the United States has expanded protections against discrimination to include race, religion, sex, age, disability and, in a growing number of jurisdictions, sexual orientation. Yet bias based on appearance remains perfectly permissible in all but one state and six cities and counties. Across the rest of the country, looks are the last bastion of acceptable bigotry. We all know that appearance matters, but the price of prejudice can be steeper than we often assume. In Texas in 1994, an obese woman was rejected for a job as a bus driver when a company doctor assumed she was not up to the task after watching her, in his words, "waddling down the hall." He did not perform any agility tests to determine whether she was, as the company would later claim, unfit to evacuate the bus in the event of an accident.…
When returning back to Wanzek’s after layoff I had noticed in my paycheck I had lost $2 an hour in pay when I had received a $2 raise and a gift certificate before layoff. I did report the loss of wage to Tina Harrison in Human Resources and she would e-mail Phyllis at Headquarters. Anthony Butler has called numerous times and no response. On November 6, 2012 a text was also sent to Phyllis by Anthony Butler in regards to his loss of pay. Phyllis also has not responded.…
In conclusion, companies shouldn’t hire because of looks, they should hire for the experience of the person. Like Greenhouse argues that it is just a way of telling people know it is discrimination. I agree with him since this has been going for a long time, I think mostly everyone…
After doing some more research, I realized that appearance discrimination is very common, especially in the workplace. In his paper, Akst stated that “plain people earn less than people of average looks, who earn less than the good-looking” (Akst 336). However, this seems to be a very subjective means of measurement, which makes his proof seem quite weak. In fact, the entire idea of measuring one’s attractiveness seems to be very abstract and opinion-based, which is why conducting more research from more sources may be…
To conclude my analysis of discrimination of looks, various federal, state, and local laws disallow discrimination against employees and job applicants in the relationships and circumstances of employment. In universal, the laws make it unlawful to treat applicants or employees less favorably or differently because they are included in certain threatened categories. This means all employment judgments should be based on legitimate business decisions.…
After reading the article “Going for the Look, But Risking Discrimination,” by Steven Greenhouse from the New York Times. I decided to disagree with Cohen's argument, because it is hurtful and unfair to intelligence, experience and personality. Maybe they don’t have skills or abilities for the job of the company. Then the company will get down even close. The most expensive thing of the 21st century is talented people. So only the beautiful people will make the company become cheaper. Abercrombie is setting a bad example for America and what people should look like. I think Abercrombie has messed up values. You cannot hire someone based only on looks. Everyone has a chance of getting any job not only people that “project” the company image.…
Although it may seem vain, appearance is very important to many employers when searching for employees of all levels. Many search for a specific type of “look,” and will often offer a higher salary to those who fit within their ideal appearance. For instance, what one wears to an interview could affect if she receives a job placement or not. Biases like this are part of the reason for the large pay gap between women.…
Daniel S. Hamermesh is an established Professor in Economics, having taught at Princeton, Michigan State and Texas, whose expertise include applications of labour economics (to beauty). He also appears on national television programmes to discuss economic issues. Hence, he has the relevant knowledge and competency in writing this text. The source publisher, Princeton University Press, is credible as it is based from an established educational institution. Hamermesh (2011) discusses the economic effect beauty has on a company's profits, asserting that having a favourable pool of executives ranked by looks and ensuring that they specialize in tasks that leverage on differences in their looks will raise sales and profits (Hamermesh, 2011, P.97). He first states how appearances can affect employer's hiring decisions (Hamermesh, 2011, P.93), then discusses why good-looking workers raise the firms' bottom lines (Hamermesh, 2011, P.94) which is only applicable when they are in positions capable of inspiring their co-workers (Executives). Finally he evaluates how differences in those executives' looks can be exploited to raise sales and profits. Although some of his arguments are supported by credible evidence, others are supported by mere assumptions. This weakens his thesis as it exposes his arguments to fallacies. Furthermore, the prominence of assumptions made throughout cripples his otherwise structurally coherent thesis.…
Nonverbal Components of Delivery and Question-and-Answer Sessions By Angelica Joy A. Balanquit Nonverbal Components of Delivery The nonverbal components of a delivery are those aspects communicated through our BODIES and FACES. It has a powerful effect on the meanings exchanged between two people. Between 65% and 93% of the total meaning of a message comes to us through non verbal signals.…