Although I don’t agree with most forms of censorship, I feel as if it is important in certain situations. For instance, television must be censored because all age groups watch it, and it influences younger children’s behavior because they have seen it on television. Not to mention anyone at any time can watch TV. Whereas censoring books is completely different. The reader has the option to read the book, making the author not reliable. Not just any age group can pick up a book and begin to read the content. But a six-month-old baby can sit in front of a television and be influenced by the action of a criminal. Certain things influence certain age groups and I feel as if books shouldn’t be responsible. You have to actually read a book; you cannot just sit and watch the pages. I feel as if censorship should appeal to only things that require it, and in my opinion, books do not require censorship.…
Most Christians think censorship is a good thing on the whole. It helps uphold high moral standards e.g. restricts access to pornography and bad language. It also can restrict people sharing prejudice against others.…
Censorship is supposedly done for the good of the people. Such as today, we see obscene material censored from our public in television. We can easily brainstorm numerous reasons for why it's appropriate to maintain this procedure, it promotes the decency in people or at least, that is what we see. However, just because something is censored doesn't mean it's done for all the right reasons. Just as there are good consequences for censorship, we may see negative outcomes. In Fahrenheit 451, we read plenty of negative outcomes. It led to the illegal behavior of Guy Montag into pursuing books, going against his job's purpose and murdering his boss.…
For the past twenty or so years information has largely been stored in digital form, providing the current generation of digital natives with access to more and more information in recent years. With this new flow of information available to the public has come increased censoring by the government. However, this is not a new issue as some might believe. Since the first primitive government was established information has been shielded and manipulated from the every day citizens of the world by those in power. The cause fought against information censorship enjoys the same past. For as long as information has been censored there have been those who have fought against it (Newth, 2010). This issue has arisen particularly in the United States, as some believe access to any information that exists is a right protected by the Constitution.…
“In 2001, the International Telecommunication Union calculated that, approximately 2.3 billion people had internet access at the end of that year. Since then, the percentage of people using the internet around the world has continued to grow” (Li 2). Censoring the internet has been a hot topic for quite a while now. Many people believe that censoring the web isn’t a good thing because of certain laws and rights we have as citizens. The internet has some cons but it also has many pros. The downside of the censorship is that the truth is blocked out and it violates our freedom of speech. On the other hand, censorship of the internet can reduce the numbers or even stop human trafficking, prevent identity theft, stop cyber bullying and so much…
Censorship, in true form, is the systematic banning of books, the Internet, or other literature due to content that has been deemed inappropriate. In the United States, it is used widely in the context of adolescent literature. Resistors to this movement often claim that the government is violating many children’s first amendment rights. Numerous cases have been brought. Others find this act of restricting material devastating to the education system. Censorship has infringed on children’s first amendment rights and has violated the civil liberties of American youth.…
" Censorship in the form of banning books and happens to remain an all too common in occurrence in conservative cultures and countries where democratic traditions are weak." (Aliprandini, Michael, and Carolyn Sprague.) We all have thoughts ,ideas ,and opinions and should be allowed to print and speak them freely. By ignoring the issue of censorship , we as humans are preventing our own thoughts and opinions from being spoken and printed.…
The Internet is an amazing place where people can communicate, transfer and research information, and find entertainment sites. It also allows freedoms that major media enterprises did not have. The concern with the Internet is it contains sites that are not appropriate for children. Some people believe the Internet should be free from censorship while other argue the Internet should be controlled.…
Censorship of books does not have any beneficial qualities. Many parents support censorship in schools to regulate what books their children have access to. What they do not understand is that not all parents believe in their specific views. Topics and material that one parent may find offensive and inappropriate may be completely acceptable to another (Swanson). The decision whether or not to read a book should be made individually, not by any single person or small group of people. In addition, the required reading in many school curriculums teaches not only academic lessons, but also life lessons that cannot be taught anywhere else. Classic novels such as Of Mice and Men, The Catcher in the Rye, and The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn are constantly challenged (Manzo). The educational and beneficial content in each of these stories definitely outweighs the few negative aspects. The responsibility of deciding what books are appropriate lies in the hands of parents, not censors.…
Writers in the “censorship is a must” perspective believes that censorship is important for the general public. Specifically, these writers believe that whoever is in the know must not tell the whole truth to others. People would surely go crazy and should not be allowed to read just any piece of literature. Also, in that respect, not just any piece of literature should be published and writers themselves should be censored, according to this perspective.…
Censorship is caused when books, movies, etc. are examined, and unacceptable parts are suppressed or the whole thing is banned. Schools nationwide have been banning books due to reasons such as racial issues, sexual explicit content, religious affiliations, violence, political bias, encouragement of “damaging” lifestyles, and etc. Often it is argued that banning books protects students from being exposed to inappropriate content, while others say that students should have the freedom to read what they want.…
Censorship protects our children from seeing what could possibly damage them mentally and keeps things that should not be seen in public to stay in the shadows. Many people hate censorship because they think it takes away their freedom of speech. It doesn’t because as long as the people don’t say things that should be said they won’t be censored. Censorship stops things from being seen that shouldn’t be. Censorship is a necessity for the new…
the material in question. In almost every case, the effort to ban books is said…
The first amendment: freedom of speech is violated with censorship. In the ALA Library Bill of Rights, parents, and only parents, have the right to prohibit or control what their children read. Freedom of expression and of opinion is for everyone, not just for the people that the majority thinks are right. In 1953, Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas said, “Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could easily defeat us,”(Quotations: First Amendment, Censorship…). This shows that even the government can see the harmful effects of book banning. Furthermore, “the school alone has the final say in what books are appropriate for the children under its care to read,…
The main reason censorship is a negative thing is the first amendment. The first amendment gurantees all Americans the right to freedom of speech, religion, press, and to assemble. Banning certain books…