Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
314 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
By dropping the atomic bomb, we were able to put an end to a war that could have continued for many more years. Though there was much controversy over the bomb, Truman, our president at the time, apprised America saying he was quite thankful for it and celebrated the scientific achievements of the minds that created it. America was the first country to create something of this caliber and he wanted us to realize how great it was. The pragmatic decision helped America to establish its military power on a global scale. It is believed that Japan did not believe that we had a weapon that could cause so much destruction, so we had no choice but to show them. The Japanese people do not believe in surrendering, they see it as dishonorable and are
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Japanese War In World War II?
    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages

    How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Japanese War In World War II?

    Truman, as he saw the attack of okinawa in 1944 witnessed how the Japanese would not surrender, they had to capture all 100,000 Japanese soldiers on the island (peace and war book page 152 by Ben Walsh). This lead to the US dropping almost 2000 tons of incendiary grenade from B 29 planes which ensured the US a victory for Truman. Although the Japanese were losing the pacific war, the fire bombs failed to persuade Japan to surrender which made Harry Truman’s decision to drop the first atomic bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. From the information given to Harry Truman of how the Japanese were not willing to surrender, dropping of the atomic bomb was justified as he did it in order to shorten the agony of war and to save American lives. Based on the choices given, Truman had to take the least costly option which was to use this bomb. Furthermore, the bomb was an approach to end Japanese brutality on the asian countries they have colonized. In retrospect, many historians have criticized him as the Japanese were rumoured to be ready to surrender prior to the use of the Atomic…

    • 1582 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Comparing The War Against Jap Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb '

    In the article, Ending The War Against Japan: Science, Morality And The Atomic Bomb, the author provides information on the war in the Pacific which involved the United States and Japan. After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor the United States entered the second World War in 1941. United States gained control of Okinawa in 1945 which meant that the U.S had control, in the months of May through August there were major air attacks on Japan, the Manhattan Project and the two atomic bombs the United States dropped in Hiroshima and Nagasaki were part of the choice out of the many options that might have been given to President Truman and Secretary of War, Henry Stimson. They felt that dropping the atomic bomb was the best way to get the Japanese to give an unconditional surrender.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    DBQ Atomic Bomb
    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages

    DBQ Atomic Bomb

    Although there were attempts at peace, Japan showed no signs of agreement towards a peaceful and unconditional surrender. Japan’s reluctance to stop fighting could have left to months more of fighting and thousands of more deaths. The atomic bomb ensured an enormous display that could quickly end the war. As Cuhrchill proclaimed, “the end of the Japanese war no longer depended upon the pouring in of their armies for the final and perhaps protracted slaughter… this nightmare picture [has] vanished… in its place the vision of the end of the whole war in one or two violent shocks” (Doc E). Churchill summed up the gist of America’s reasoning for implementing the bombs. The United States did not have to depend on the slaughter of millions of people in bloody, messy fights, and , instead, “a speedy end to the Second World War” could be reached with one machine (Doc E). However, once the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese continued to resist. It wasn’t until a second bomb was dropped that Japan surrendered with a simple stipulation that their emperor remain in his position. This alone proves the military necessity of the bombs. Despite the attack on Hiroshima, Japanese still wished to continue their war. If not for the second bomb, who know how many lives would have been lost.…

    • 639 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan
    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros And Cons Of United States Bombing Japan

    I want to thank you for your response and clearly stating your perspective regarding the United States bombing Japan. However, I must respectfully disagree with your argument. I do believe the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war because without the bomb the United States was prepared to invade Japan. Statistically speaking the use of omb actually saved thousands of American and Japanese lives rather than invading Japan. I do concur with the questionable morality of using the bomb because killing many individuals was not an easy decision Truman had to make, consequently the decision ended the otherwise long and drawn out war. Japan was prepared to put a fight, no matter the circumstances. With the Japanese army and civilian militia expected…

    • 186 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How Did Truman Decided To Drop Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki
    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page

    How Did Truman Decided To Drop Atomic Bombs On Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    President Truman decided to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki because the Japanese just did not surrender. However, it was the Japanese military leaders that did not want to surrender which led to the bombing on Hiroshima. The president asked the Japanese the first time to surrender by August 3rd and they did not and because of this being a war there is no sympathy. I believe that because of them not surrendering there is no other option. This war consisted of many people dying and there is no option but to surrender or get attacked. Japan if had the opportunity to attack, they would attack and this is true because of the constant resistance they have within the war.…

    • 234 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS
    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Hiroshima PROS and CONS

    Although the use of the bomb killed many innocent civilians it also saved many lives because if the bomb had not dropped the war would have gone on with more air raids and more attacks on cities and many soldiers on both sides would have died. If the US had not dropped the atomic bomb the nuclear arms race would have would have went on and the standards would have been different and it may not have been just two cities but an entire country.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Drop The Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons
    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Drop The Atomic Bomb Pros And Cons

    America has been through a tough and grueling war. We have lost many soldiers and need to speed it up on the Pacific front against the Japanese to change the tide and encourage surrender. America should drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Japan is in this war for the long hall and something has to change so men stop dying every day. Dropping the bomb is the best thing to do for the US and its military at this point.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki
    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of The Bombing Of Hiroshima And Nagasaki

    I don't think that the US should have bombed Japan. It was entirely unnecessary and the US had plenty of opportunities to do other things. America could have used a technical demonstration to show how powerful the bombs were on a nearby, but uninhabited, island. This would have been a effective intimidation act while not adding to WWII's already enormous death count. Admittedly this alone would not have ensured Japan's surrender, but Japan was planning on surrendering in the fall off 1945. The only thing that was keeping them from surrendering sooner was their unwillingness to accept completely unconditional surrender. The bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki may have ended World War II, but was it worth the lives…

    • 119 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb
    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page

    The Pros Of Constructing An Atomic Bomb

    In August of 1939, President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to construct an atomic bomb. He was also warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. Roosevelt, in response to this set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which consisted of both military and civilian representatives. In order to reach their own advancements in the nuclear field faster than Germany they were to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. At Columbia University a limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions were performed by Enrico Fermi and Leo…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing
    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Atomic Bombing

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs
    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of Atomic Bombs

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    What Is The America's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan
    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages

    What Is The America's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb On Japan

    The atomic that was dropped on Japan helped end the war earlier. The atomic bomb was the best way to assure an end to the war. “When the atomic bomb became available in July 1945, it appeared to be the most promising way to end the war”(Walker). By dropping the bomb on Japan, they would have to surrender because of their loss and destruction. The atomic bombs made Japan’s emperor make a decision as whether to surrender or continue. “The atomic bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki persuaded Emperor Hirohito, who had wavered for weeks, that the war must end immediately” (Walker). By dropping the bomb, the U.S. ended the war…

    • 509 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing
    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of Hiroshima Bombing

    On August 6, President Harry Truman plans to drop an atomic bomb on the Japanese city of Hiroshima. This bomb is supposed to have a major impact on this city. Tens of thousands of people are estimated to die on impact, and thousands are estimated to die after due to the exposure to radiation. President Truman wants to drop the bomb to end the six year war, however, it has caused a major controversy over the amount of damage it will cause. Some people believe that this amount of destruction is needed to assure the war ends. They believe that Japan is going to attack the United States soon, and because the USA is low on resources, they are more vulnerable for the attack. Others think that we should drop the bomb, Little Man, in a nearby harbor to scare the Japanese. They also think that the atomic bomb is too extreme. The blast of the bomb is supposed to be…

    • 376 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Benefits Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb
    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Benefits Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

    Dropping the Atomic Bomb is not necessary for many reasons such as the following. The Ground and Naval wars are progressing strongly and also Japan is already on defense. The ground war is doing very well and has worked for us so far so why not continue. Some may say that the mountainous region of Japan could lead to the death of many American soldiers but the Japanese soldiers would have many fatalities so it would even out instead of just killing many innocent Japanese. The Naval war was making progress by taking over Japanese islands in the pacific. This way the US would be better off not dropping the atomic bombs.…

    • 357 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Consequences Of Using The Atomic Bombs
    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Consequences Of Using The Atomic Bombs

    The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More

Related Topics