Regan, Tom. "Animal Rights, Human Wrongs." Forming a Critical Perspective. Boston, MA: Pearson Learning Solutions, 2010. 336-40. Print.…
Justin Le Ms. Jackson ERWC English 28 October 2014 Animal Bill of Rights Despite our genetic makeup and ability, each living organism still obtains the ability to partake in the vast contribution towards this world. We as humans should be proactive in our role of establishing and maintaining a fine balance of life. A prominent responsibility we possess is to regard all living beings as equals.…
Cosmetics, scientific research, cleaning products, drug tests, and other research facilities have used animals as a way to evaluate their products or to discover possible scientific breakthroughs. Statistics show that more than 100 million animals die in the U.S. every year for experiments done by companies, the government, scientific facilities, or other institutions. Yet, the number is highly inaccurate since mice, rats, birds, and cold blooded animals are not believed to be animals by the Animal Welfare Act. The Animal Welfare Act is one of the only actions that are done to ensure that animals are protected from horrible lab conditions and painful experiments, yet they are barely reinforced. The previously mentioned animals make up more…
In "The Case for Animal Rights," Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights. Regan states the animal rights movement is committed to a number of goals, including: "the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; and the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping. Regan goes on and tells us the "fundamental wrong is the system that allows us to view animals as our resources, here for us--to be eaten, or surgically manipulated, or exploited for sport or money." Once people accept this view of animals being here for our resources, they believe what harms the animal doesn't really matter. Regan explains that in order to have this changed, people must change their beliefs. If enough people, especially people that hold a public office, change their beliefs, there can be laws made to protect the rights of animals.…
How would you feel if you were caged in and force fed? Animals, around the world, are being abused like that by many humans, every year. They are being chained up, their furs are being pulled straight off from their bodies, and they are being severely abused. Moreover, animal societies and the government started to take action to fight for animal rights. In the article Can Animal Rights Go Too Far?, Adam Cohen explains how animals are being treated and how they are sold to the market. Just like humans, animals have lives, too. They deserve better treatment and care. Therefore, the government should enhance making laws for animal rights, in addition to human rights.…
“We love all animals, it’s just people we’re not too crazy about,” is a comment made by People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) (Fegan 1). This outrageous comment insinuates PETA puts animals’ rights before the rights and needs of humans, which is not the way nature intended. The PETA organization has been around since 1980 affectively with their hyped-up, illogical stories of how we need to treat animals as equals and grant them rights that only we, as humans, should enjoy. These are assumptions and claims which are used to further their cause and are not founded in reality. Contradictory to PETA’s beliefs, animals should not have the same rights as humans, because that is the law of nature. According to Erasmus Darwin, who stated “Such is the condition of organic nature! whose first law might be expressed in the words 'Eat or be eaten!”. (Science Quotes by Erasmus Darwin) I do not intend to condemn animal rights activists, since people are entitled to their own opinions, but rather discuss why this way of life may be harmful to themselves and others.…
The Animal Welfare Act was first first passed in 1876 in Britain and titled “the Cruelty to Animals Act of 1876”. It was created to approve all animals used in research. Since there were initiatives to protect laboratory animals it took many years until there was a national law to protect laboratory animals in the U.S. There were multiple numbers of states that passes anti-cruelty laws between 1828 and 1898 in the U.S. and fourteen states exempted animal experiments. There were also a number of bills proposed in many different places but there was not any federal legislation passed until 1966.…
The Animal Welfare Act is long overdue for an update and should be amended further to improve the quality of life for all commercially bred animals. Until recently, many States have been in the dark over their own local regulations of puppy mills or factory farms. Now more States are realizing the damaging effects that poorly regulated puppy mills can cause. The Animal Welfare Act is a Federal law which covers all of the basic standards of living such as food, water, and shelter for commercially bred animals in the United States. The Animal Welfare Act was signed in 1966 by President Lyndon B. Johnson and is a one of a kind Federal Law.…
In December 11, 2013 a group of Animal Rights activists from the Indiana Animal Rights Alliance was protesting near the Bankers Life Fieldhouse, an indoor arena located in Indianapolis, Indiana. Up to 100 activists showed up at the Fieldhouse before each performance; some of the activists came from as far away as Kentucky to support the cause. Their protests were based against the practices used by the Ringling Brothers Circus to train and take care of animals. Only few people stopped to talk to the members of the association, while several others yelled “shut up.”i According to Lori Lovely, “One father encouraged his two-year-old-daughter to ‘say it, say it!’ She uttered an expletive to the demonstrators.”ii People were not being receptive of the issue pertaining animal abuse. Linda Cridge, an activist of the animal rights said, "They try not to look at us because they don't want to know the truth."iii According to the article, the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals and the Animal Protection Institute had filed a lawsuits against the Ringling Brothers Circus for the mistreatment and use of endangered species. The lawsuit was filed specially because of the abuse the circus inflicts to the elephants they exploit. “Elephants are social, they shouldn’t be treated like this,”iv said Carrie Knight, from Greenwood, who came because of her love for animals.v (See Appendix A to read the full case.)…
Animals on a daily basis all over the world are being mistreated and abused by many people that do not care for them. There are very few people attempting to protect these animals, whether they are domestic animals, farm animals, or wildlife animals. More attention should be drawn to the treatment of animals because even if we do have laws for animals and for their well being, many people still do not follow these laws. The laws already established for animals should be enforced, because I do agree that animals need protection, as in free from any harm done towards them purposely, but to have a Bill of Rights specifically made for animals seems extreme.…
Animal rights are a common altercation when looked at from a medical standpoint and from an equality view. Two authors construct essays discussing the opposing views of animal rights. The first author, Cohen, approaches the need of animal rights from a medical standpoint, while Regan addresses the morality of zoos and the equality of animals. Regan and Cohen differentiate animal rights by addressing the value and equality of animals in regards to animals testing and animal captivity. In this essay, Cohen and Regan’s arguments will both be addressed along with differences and similarities between the two arguments.…
In the Agricultural World one of the most controversial issues right now is that between Animal Welfare and Animal Rights. Animal Rights activists are arguing that people are no more superior than animals are and Animal Welfare activists are resorting to the government to see that animals are being taken care of properly. Me personally, I'm for Animal Welfare because without the use of animals our global economy would soon fall.…
Animal rights and animal welfare fall at different points on a continuum that runs from animal liberation at one end to animal exploitation at the other. The animal rights viewpoint can be defined as the belief that humans do not have the right to use animals for their own gainin the laboratory, on the farm, in entertainment or in the wild. The degree to which humans may benefit from any use of nonhuman animals is irrelevant to determine how animals should be treated. The animal welfare viewpoint advocates the humane use of animals which involves maintaining animal well-being and prohibiting unnecessary cruelty. Many distinctions can be made within these terms but both connote a concern for the suffering of others.…
Since the beginning of time animals have walked the Earth with man. They have been used for food, clothing, friends, pets, and for other things. Many people believe that hurting an animal for personal gain is inhumane, but I disagree. A “Bill of Rights” for animals, I believe, is unnecessary in that animals wouldn’t even realize that they withhold such a powerful thing. They are needed by humans for survival, and finally if the laws on how we can treat animals is changed, companies would now have to re-learn the steps in properly caring for an animal before killing/experimenting with it. Animals do not need their own “Bill of Rights.”…
Since the beginning of mankind, animals have been a food source. In the past century, they have also helped humans by being service animals for the disabled and companion animals to get us through rough times. Even though animals have been a big contributor to the progress of the human race, they are being mistreated and not being allowed the life they deserve. In the past, animals have been well respected. Indians would pray for the spirit of the animal they killed to make sure it got to the afterlife. They would only kill what was needed and make sure that all of the animal was used for something. The way in which animals are treated has changed drastically throughout the ages. Animals have gone from being well respected to being treated like objects. If the big corporations that are involved with agriculture animals will not admit the suffering they cause to animals, then something else need to happen to help these helpless animals. Animal cruelty laws need to be enforced and hardened to ensure better living conditions for all animals from livestock to the common house pet.…