Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
239 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Judges In The Supreme Court
As we know in the Article III of the U.S constitution says that all judges in the Supreme Court and Inferior Courts can have their jobs for the rest of their life. The reasons that the judges can lose their job is by retirement or if they have been accused of any crime.
The pros of lifetime of judges in the Supreme Court are that they do not have to worry about the political pressure or to contribute with money for any political campaign. “The basic purpose of lifetime appointment is to assure the integrity of the power granted to Court Justices and protect them against unwarranted interference from either the legislative or executive branch”. (laws, n.d.). In addition, there are judges in the Supreme Court that worries about make a fair system
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona
    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Judical Selection Process in Pa and Arizona

    According to the judicial selection website, Pennsylvania does not use the Judicial Nominating Commissions as their method to selecting a justice to serve on the bench (www.judicialselctions.us). The justices run for election to gain a seat in the courts. They do this by campaigning and getting the necessary funds from donations and their political party. Elections in the state are held in odd numbered years. Once a justice is elected they can serve an unlimited amount of terms until the mandatory retirement age of seventy and are retained or re-elected by voters. Appellate Courts and Courts of Common Pleas judges serve ten year terms. All other court justices such as, Magisterial District and…

    • 1011 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    US History Chapter 11 Vocab
    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages

    US History Chapter 11 Vocab

    John Marshall- One Federalist judge, Chief Justice John Marshall, was not removed when the new Republican-Democratic Congress reeled the Judiciary Act of 1801 and repealed16 new federal judges. He served under presidents including Jefferson and others for 34 years. He shaped the American legal tradition more than any other person.…

    • 678 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices
    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page

    Pros And Cons Of No Term Limits On Supreme Court Justices

    Although their are pro's and con's for each argument, I believe that it is better for the country to have no term limits on supreme court justices. It seems to me that the problems term limits cause, such as strategic retirement, are preferable to the alternative possibility, that the justices begin making decisions based on what would best help their personal careers in the…

    • 65 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper
    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Federal Judges Quiz Paper

    | Correct, "Article III federal judges" (as opposed to judges of some courts with special jurisdictions) serve "during good behavior" (often paraphrased as appointed "for life"). Judges hold their seats until they resign, die, or are removed from office.…

    • 1242 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons
    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Supreme Court Justice Pros And Cons

    Having our Supreme Court Justice serving on the bench for life can have pros and cons. Although, most of our fellows americans seem to have more drawbacks about our Supreme Court of Justice life tenure position. With this in mind, let me first mention the pros…

    • 502 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Does Plessy's Personal Ideologies Affect The Judicial System?
    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Does Plessy's Personal Ideologies Affect The Judicial System?

    When Justices are appointed, they take the oath to make decisions that are fair and according to the Constitution. The decisions justices take every day affect the lives of Americans in many ways. The Justices are given the heavy responsibility to interpret the law and Constitution. However, many times Justices get confused about the original intent of the law, and therefore interpret it different from what the legislators wrote back then. Since the legislators of the Constitution are not alive today, Justices have to try their best to make decisions according to the law.…

    • 832 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices
    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Examples Of Term Limits Of Supreme Court Justices

    This means that the Justices may hold office until they die, reign, or are impeached. Impeachment is the only exception to the phrase good behavior. As it states in Article II that Supreme Court justices can be removed from office by impeachment, just as the president and vice president can. Only one Justice, Samuel Chase, was ever impeached and that was in 1804.…

    • 1104 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper
    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages

    United State Supreme Court Research Paper

    The Federal Court System contains three levels of courts: first, U.S district courts and various courts of limited jurisdiction (trial courts of general jurisdiction). Second, U.S courts of appeals (intermediate courts of appeals). Finally, the highest level of the three level federal court system is the United State Supreme Court. Today, the United State Supreme Court is located in Washington D.C.…

    • 629 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch
    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Assess The Importance Of The Judicial Branch

    The Constitution was written in 1787 to establish a national government, divide powers, and gives the roles to the three branches. James Madison, one of the authors of the Constitution, decided along with many other leaders that it is best to have a framework of how the government should work so there would be order and avoid problems in the future. The legislative branch is in change of passing and making laws. The judicial branch is in charge of making sure that the country is being constitutional.. The executive branch is in charge of enforcing the laws.…

    • 663 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices
    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Term Limit In Supreme Court Justices

    One of the major jobs for the federal judges is to protect the United States from the “tyranny of the majority”. Furthermore, even if the majority rules, the minority still has rights. Many components of the Bill of Rights, which the judges are called to enforce, are designed to protect the rights of the unpopular minorities. Being a Supreme Court judge is a difficult job, and even with life tenure, they are not completely immune from political pressure. They remain members of society; therefore it is difficult to allow things to happen even if they know it is morally wrong, but constitutionally…

    • 1001 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century
    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Judicial Branch In The 20th Century

    "[The Judicial Branch] may truly be said to have neither FORCE nor WILL, but merely judgment” Hamilton explained when analyzing the Judiciary’s initial intent. Article 3 section 1 of the Constitution grants the Supreme court “The judicial Power of the United States.” this power can be given to inferior courts such as circuit and district courts as “Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Later, in article 3 section 2, the Judicial branch is granted power that “extend[s] to all Cases, in Law and Equity, arising under this Constitution, the Laws of the United States, and Treaties made, or which shall be made, under their Authority.” The Judicial branch has explicit power to interpret the intent of past laws, treaties made, and…

    • 1390 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review
    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Pros and Cons of Judicial Review

    is one of the sole purposes of the Supreme Court of the United States. Many…

    • 1033 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits
    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Supreme Court Term Limits

    The Supreme Court needs younger judges to function better. The supreme courts judges will not function very well because they are missing one judge out of nine judges. For example “Antonin Scalia suffered from coronary artery disease, obesity and diabetes” and this shows that the Supreme Court will not function properly with old judges. Therefore, term limits are a great idea because younger judges are less likely to have any medical problems that will interfere with their job. 10-20 years is long enough for a judge to build up genuine exercise and genuine powers and the majority of Americans are in favor.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Essay On Life Tenure
    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Essay On Life Tenure

    Because the life tenure for a Supreme Court Justice will protect them from making biased or “polarised” decisions, the life tenure should remain as it has been for over two hundred years. Just in the past year, Chief Justice Roberts, Justice Thomas, and Justice Alito, who are all more conservative, have all voted on certain cases with more liberal justices. Andrew Martin and Kevin Quinn, who have researched the decisions of justices, have discovered that several justices change their opinions over time, something that wouldn’t happen so…

    • 510 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay
    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Supreme Court Persuasive Essay

    Many speculate that Trump will have the opportunity to appoint not one, but three justices as many get ready to retire. Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer, are 83 and 78, respectively. Both are liberal and help balance the current composition of the Supreme Court. In addition, Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, who is 80, also help balance the Supreme Court (Barnes). If those three retire, which is likely, then Trump appoint more justices. However, if they stay, then the make up will remain slightly more balanced.…

    • 478 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics