The paper you about to read are about Reinstating the Military Draft, if all citizens should be eligible from the ages of 18-42. Some citizens think this should be done others think it shouldn’t in the pages to come this paper will show you the pros and cons of some of our citizens and some of our Military Commanders active and retired. In an interview with National Radio “All Things Considered” (Douglas Lute) said frequent tours for the U.S. forces have stressed the volunteer stressed the forces. He said it’s time to consider reinstating the military draft…
Our military budget will stay on the rise for many reasons, like the rise of china, the threats from Iran and N. Korea, and the upcoming expansion of our military. If we are going to do something about the budget, we should not cut the military budget. We need to figure out how to get substantially more for each dollar spent. Not only in the military, but throughout our government…
The United States deficit, surplus, and debt will always have an impact on taxpayers. In the state of high deficit the government seeks ways to cut and save money for debt payment. The government does this by pulling funding from programs that have little government impact. Increasing taxes also supplies the government with extra income. In addition to the reduction or elimination of certain tax credits, the government analyzes school funding for cost effectiveness. Each step the government takes has a trickling effect on taxpayer’s dollar.…
Military and national defense are public goods, meaning that it could suffer from free rider problem. Citizens of the United States of America will benefit from military, a component of national defense, even if they do not pay directly. However, the production of the service required an input in the form of budget, which is partitioned from the tax collected. In a certain sense, budget for each year can be considered scarce, thus reducing funding for EPA allows for increase budget for military. The benefit for the nation as a whole is the improvement of military power, thus ability for the nation to protect its citizens, interest and sovereignty. Compared to the initial status however, it is perhaps unneeded. US military spending is already ranked as the first in the world, thus the marginal benefit of allocating more funding to such area will result in vastly diminished return. Therefore, the benefit payout, while might be evident in shorter term, might be rather small.…
While most Americans call the war the, “American-Mexican War”, the other side would call it, “The U.S. Invasion”. If it is God’s reasoning to expand the U.S. territory as far as possible, then is it also his reasoning to murder those upon their own land? It is not only unjustified to take the land from the Mexicans, however to become inhuman enough to kill those while doing so is unspeakable. There was no need for any more conflict at that time, so to start a war was not ideal for anyone. Would a war be more beneficial or cost efficient than a compromise or a buyout? The Mexicans had only simple ideas of allowing outsiders into their land to increase population. In the words of General Francisco Mejia, “The right of conquest has always been…
There's doubtlessly about it: being the U.S. president is a hard and frequently difficult employment. Richard Nixon broadly said, "Scouring floors and exhausting bedpans has as much respect as the Presidency."…
Military Units have had a tremendous impact on history since the beginning of time. They protect and defend sovereign states. These military units often lack the numbers to protect their country. This has created a large debate over a military draft. There are two sides, those for and those against. The debate over the draft is endless. Great points can be made from either side of the argument over the draft, but the there is a more logical solution to resolve this issue: the U.S draft should be reinstated.…
The War on Terrorism and Patriot Act are two important acts regarding terrorism. What is the War on Terrorism and Patriot act you may ask? Well the Patriot act was made so that the United States could hold someone in custody if they are connected or could piently be connected to terrorist groups. Now we have the War on Terrorism act. This act was made so that in the case of a terrorist attack they can stop it with military action. Even though they both have their pros they also have cons. Terrorism is horrible and can lead to the death of innocent people but there are ways we can stop it including and not including the patriot act and War on Terrorism.…
proclaims western beliefs and medicine superior to Liberian culture. This again feeds into the issue of lack of trust: and trust between those giving and receiving aid is a significantly large issues because it keeps the provision of aid and communication network efficient. Without trust humanitarian work cannot suffice.…
The United States has been at war since its creation in 1776. It has battled confrontation 222 out of 239 years, just about 93% of its continuance. Notably, one of the most crucial wars is the “War on Terror”. Beginning in March of 2003, this war initially served the purpose of getting rid of the country’s leader Saddam Hussein to prevent his use of suspected stockpiles of weapons of mass destruction. While this war was strategically justified the real war between Iraq and the U.S. began long before what is officially recognized. The United States of America should not have invaded Iraq as it promoted the illegal exercise of government power and democracy, encouraged continuous genocide and violence, and empowered an extreme capitalist regime.…
US President Donald Trump signed an executive order on January 27, 2017. The order bans citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering the US for at least 90 days. The order also suspended refugee admission program of the US for 120 days. US officials added that the order is only a first step toward a wider ban, which is aimed at protecting the US from terrorist attacks. The executive order is in line with President Trump’s campaign pledge. He promised a total and complete shutdown of Muslim immigration during his presidential campaign.…
The government needs to support more funding for the public school system, so the next generation of children who born in lower class family can better advance themselves and achieve a bigger piece of the American dream. According to Bob Herbert from Hiding From Reality, “For all the talk about the need to improve the public schools and get rid of incompetent teachers, school systems around the country are being hammered with dreadful cutbacks and teachers are being let go in droves,…
“The thought of military grade weapons being given to the local police is madness” (Sgt. Rob Aponte quoted in Kachmar). GIving military grade weapons to local police is not something people think about daily. Most think if there is armored cars in their village would make their village safer, but is this really the case? According to the 1033 program, which was installed in 1997, more than 4.3 billion dollars of military gear has been given to local police across the nation senes 1997 (ingraham). In 2013 alone just about a billion dollars was given to local law enforcement agencies (ingraham).The Department of Defense is selling these weapons to local police, but they shouldn’t be selling military grade weapons to untrained police officers (Ingraham). Overall, selling military grade weapons to local police forces is dangerous, excessive, and unnecessary.…
If the government redirected this toward educating its citizens, public schools could be completely reshaped. For example, experts predict that $40 billion could provide preschool for all three- and four-year-olds. This program would help millions of children and cost a fraction of the war expenses. Why not designate a portion of the military expenditures to reconstructing the South Bronx schools that Kozol claimed were mold-laden? First graders, who now occupy classrooms with four age groups, would be better able to concentrate on…
The United States for the past 100 years has been a forward presence around the world. America’s foreign policy has had many successful missions providing humanitarian aid to countries suffering from natural disasters and inhabitable living conditions. America is also first to respond to countries that are on the brink of war, providing military assistance and assets to help spread democracy around the world. But at what cost is America willing to go to, to help these countries? The forward presence and the willing to help have been very beneficial to the United States of creating and reaffirming alliances around the world, but has also created many issues at home. America is known for its strong military that is on constant patrol, like a neighborhood watches roving its streets keeping them safe. But every military asset that is put in positions around the world is costing the tax payers of America money. America has amassed a huge national deficit that has threatened the government to shutdown, meaning that the very same people that are going in harm’s way to help create democracy or provide humanitarian aid, would lose money. America’s issue doesn’t just stop at the government’s inability to get the country out of debt, America is also lacking in the education of their children. America’s education system has been suffering over the past 20 years and is only getting worse. With the constant layoffs of teachers and the reduction of teacher salaries, Americas youth are suffering. America has the weakest education system of all the developed countries in the world. The teachers are not the Americans suffering from lay offs, with the economy in a constant plummet it is hard for American business to stay open and keep their employees on the pay roll. Companies the United States have been forced to outsource their jobs to third world countries for cheaper labor. America is on a steady nose dive and its going to take a lot for the…