Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons Saving The World

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
556 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Nuclear Weapons Saving The World
Nuclear weapons have been around for over 70 years now, still many people around the world are oblivious of the effects that they still have on our world today. The first nuclear weapon, known as the Atomic Bomb, was first detonated in 1945 in Alamogordo, NM. Since then, Nuclear weapons have only had a negative impact on the world, specifically they have affected the environment, economies worldwide, world security, and all life on Earth. The extreme amount of power that these devices possess is unnecessary and illogical which is why they should be outlawed. Although the world's stockpile has decreased, the amount of countries now in possession of these weapons has increased. The 44th president of the United States, Barack Obama has built a …show more content…

He has collected a great amount of accomplishments in doing so such as, the New Start treaty. Obama has been quoted as saying “The threat of nuclear war has gone down, but the risk of nuclear attack has gone up." This can be supported by the large number of times where a nuclear attack was close to happening.

It is urgent that action is taken against Governments holding and creating these weapons. As citizens of the world. Our lives are at risk when these devices are apart of our reality. In the article “Ban Nuclear Weapons; Saving Money and Saving the World” by Alan Robock he states that if 2 counties were to have a nuclear war, “it would only take about 50 Hiroshima sized atomic bombs” to create climate change never before seen in recorded human history. There are some 2,000 nuclear warheads on high alert, ready to be launched anywhere in the world within 4-8 minutes. There is a phenomenon known as "Nuclear Winter" which is of real concern. Experts say the smoke from the detonations would block the sunlight from reaching the earth's surface for years. Eventually many most places, if not all, would become uninhabitable. These weapons


You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    America has been through a tough and grueling war. We have lost many soldiers and need to speed it up on the Pacific front against the Japanese to change the tide and encourage surrender. America should drop the atomic bomb on Japan. Japan is in this war for the long hall and something has to change so men stop dying every day. Dropping the bomb is the best thing to do for the US and its military at this point.…

    • 450 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    In August of 1939, President F. D. Roosevelt was made aware of the possibility that German scientists were racing to construct an atomic bomb. He was also warned that Hitler would be more than willing to resort to such a weapon. Roosevelt, in response to this set up the Advisory Committee on Uranium, which consisted of both military and civilian representatives. In order to reach their own advancements in the nuclear field faster than Germany they were to study the current state of research on uranium and to recommend an appropriate role for the federal government. At Columbia University a limited military funding for isotope separation and the work on chain reactions were performed by Enrico Fermi and Leo…

    • 120 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The dropping of the Atomic Bomb was an attack made on the Japanese by the Americans. Although the dropping of the Atomic Bomb by the United States helped to end World War II, the act was unjustified because of innocent Japanese civilians that were needlessly murdered and were not given sufficient time to surrender from the area. Consequently, the Japanese were defeated before and they were attempting to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the unsuccessful bombing with conventional weapons. This would be the reason that the bombing was not useful.…

    • 635 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The only military use of atomic weapons has been on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki and almost certainly brought a prompt conclusion to WW2. However, the question of whether it was necessary is still hotly debated 70 years after the event. The answer is no it wasn’t necessary, although it is not as simple as you may think because if I had just been a soldier fighting in New Guinea or if I was a POW starving on the Thai-Burma railway [1] then answer is yes it was necessary. Necessary can have various meanings though such as indispensable or requisite, but also mean acting from need. The question becomes very problematic or ambiguous if one uses both meanings as again we get a yes and no.…

    • 969 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I. Manhatten Project (C)before German & Japanese, Pearl Harbor opportunity, Japan already defeat, Hiroshima (70,000), Nagasaki (40,000), “complete destruction” “utter destruction”…

    • 251 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    The two readings Band of Brothers and A Message to Garcia, were insightful into what it takes to be a good Soldier, and leader. The underlying theme of Band of Brothers is that of brotherhood, hard work, and the importance of doing what needs to be done regardless of how difficult it maybe. While A Message to Garcia, brings up of the importance of work ethic and how that is an uncommon trait that everyone values but few have. Both texts tell how the importance of discipline, focus, and the courage it takes to over-come overwhelming odds. They both speak about life lessons that will guide me towards what I hope to accomplish and become over my military career.…

    • 2787 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Choose TWO sources from this list that relates to the human rights that you have chosen to address, based on an obstacle in your novel. (Remember, you will be writing to this prompt: Based on your research, write about a human rights issue that related to your novel and how it applies to the US and one other country.)…

    • 594 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    I agree with the nuclear optimists that nuclear proliferation will make international politics more stable and less war prone. Since nuclear weapons are classified as weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), more specifically as true WMD (Baylis pg 386), I believe states that possess nuclear weapons will be reluctant to use them against states who also possess nuclear weapons, out of the fear those state will retaliate with their own nuclear weapons. The use of nuclear weapons poses risk to a state that chooses to use a nuclear weapon against another nuclear proliferated state. Therefore, by this logic it benefits to a state to be nuclear proliferated as a defensive precaution or a deterrence mechanism.…

    • 581 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Science has taught us how to put the atom to work. But to make it work for good instead of for evil lies in the domain dealing with the principals of human duty. We are now facing a problem more of ethics than physics.” - Bernard M Baruch. There were two atomic bombs that were dropped during World War II. There were few survivors after the atomic bombs were dropped. Both of the atom bombs had nicknames. They were dropped three days apart from each other. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima. The second was dropped on Nagasaki. The atomic bombs are what ended the war.…

    • 881 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The atomic bomb is the most destructive weapon that has ever been used, so deadly it has never been used after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It was not necessary to drop the bomb on these cities as there were many other ways that they could have made Japan surrender without dropping/developing the atomic bomb. However many believe that the atomic bomb should have been dropped on Japan so that the casualties could have been minimized for the allies. The United States had made 2 bombs to decimate 2 of the major Japanese military bases. A bomb so destructive that even its creator did not want to be used, he was quoted saying, "Now I have become the death destroyer of the world."…

    • 994 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The United States should not continue to develop and test weapons of mass destruction because it can kill millions,It's expensive and has lack of morals. On August 6, 1945 Harry S. Truman, had to make a world changing and tough decision. The United States dropped the world’s first deployed atomic bomb all over Japan,Hiroshima.The explosion destroyed 90% of the city and very quickly killed about 80,000 people and later on because of radiation exposure , 10,000 people died. The United States shouldn’t make and test weapons of mass destruction because it’s harmful, costs a lot, and has flaws.…

    • 608 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Every time I hear a word "War" as a child, I still have to hear a word "Nuclear Weapons". From that time, I didn't know what they are. But when I grow up, I learned that Nuclear Weapons are the device that can destroy many people or one small country. So I believe that They are the killing device. From these reasons…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The thesis states the petition made on July 4, 1945, to the president of the United States drafted by author Leo Szilard and cosigned by scientist of the atomic bomb committee to consider the consequences of using the atomic bomb. The organization and structure of the writing brings a strong message about the devastation an atomic bomb would do to any city in the hands of our Army, but ultimately by our Commander and Chief who has the power to use it (Szilard).…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Albert Einstein once said, “The explosive force of nuclear fission has changed everything except our modes of thinking and thus we drift towards unparalleled catastrophe. We shall require an entirely new pattern of thinking if humankind is to survive” Albert Einstein, 1946. Nuclear weapons are arguably the most feared weapon ever created. They have the capability to end wars, nations, and even our planet if we are not careful. So, how serious is the threat of a terrorist cell acquiring a nuclear weapon and using it in an attack? Any statement containing the words ‘nuclear and weapon’ must almost always be considered serious but what is the likelihood of a successful nuclear terrorist attack occurring? The answer is anything but straight forward and many different avenues must be explored in order to better understand this current threat.…

    • 647 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Whilst the atomic bomb is considered as one of the greatest inventions of all time, in terms of how it could protect a nation, is it really worth having numerous amounts of governments on edge at the thought of a weapon so powerful? Ronald Reagan described nuclear weapons as:…

    • 1341 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays