Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Proving The Innocence Of Crime

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
301 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Proving The Innocence Of Crime
In deciding if a criminal is guilty or innocent, they are always guilty until there is evidence to prove their innocence. In order to be deemed innocent, the accused has to be able to prove they are innocent with evidence, and without evidence, they are presumed guilty. “The accused sat in the courtroom and was already deemed guilty. Thus would continue many long months of accusations, stress and proving their innocence.” (Press Sheboygan, Mis-Vat ). In most cases, someone accused of a crime has to prove their innocence unless there is evidence to prove they are indeed guilty of the crime. If there is no evidence, the accused has to work hard for months or even years to prove their innocence, even if they never committed the crime. Furthermore,

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Every day there are cases with little to no evidence and people going to jail despite the lack of evidence. That very thing happened to Adnan Masud Syed; On February 25, 2000, he was found guilty of the first-degree murder of Hae Min Lee. In January of 1999 Hae’s body was found manhandling strangled in a shallow grave in (name of park) one month after she went missing. Jay Wilds, Syed’s best friend, says he helped Syed dump her dead body but was not there for the murder. What happened to innocent until proven guilty? It is hard to convict someone of murder with no physical evidence.…

    • 719 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Innocent until proven guilty; a phrase commonly used by the accused. But if the accused is guilty but never proven to be, does that mean he is innocent? An example of this is Steve Harmon in the novel, Monster. Steve is on trial for felony murder for a robbery. In the book, Monster by Walter Dean Myers, although Steve Harmon is pronounced innocent, he is actually guilty because he lied to the jury, is familiar with the crime, and is paranoid.…

    • 278 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Adnan Syed Case

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What would it be like if a person was convicted as guilty, but was really innocent? The murder of Hae Min Lee was committed on January 13, 1999. The person found guilty of this crime was Adnan Syed. Adnan was Hae’s boyfriend for a while and they were happy together, according to friends. Sarah Koenig is just a random person to Adnan Syed. She was told about the case by Rabia Chaudry whose brother was Adnan’s friend. Sarah heard what Rabia had to say about the case and was very interested. Since that time, she has done a podcast called, Serial. After investigating, it is clear that Adnan Syed is innocent because after school on the day of the murder, Adnan talked to Asia McClain at the library for a few minutes at 2:30 p.m., Adnan did not obsess over Hae after their breakup, and Mr. S was going to use the restroom in Leakin Park where he found Hae.…

    • 1747 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Introduction:Dna evidence has been known for many years in crime scenes.Dna evidence was first discovered in 1986.Dna evidence can find anyone by finding blood,skin cells,hair,saliva,and semen.Dna evidence can be good at finding people 95% at a time,because of the cells in the dna.…

    • 377 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Basically means that the jury cannot be biased to the accused. If you had people on the jury who disliked you or immediately judge you, then most likely you are going to jail. The second part of this is, you can’t have someone who has been involved with the same crime. For example if a mother who is on the jury lost a son to a hit and run, and you’ve be accused of a hit and run, it would have already been biased. The trail must be held in the area the crime took place, or it wouldn’t be fair to the accused.…

    • 104 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Since 1992, almost three hundred people in the United States have been exonerated by the Innocence Project. What this means is that almost three hundred people have been acquitted for a crime that they were falsely convicted of committing and were then released back into society. Many of these false convictions were the result of a lack of technology back in the time of the trials which lead to unvalidated or improper use of forensic science. Some additional reasons that people are wrongfully convicted are misidentifications from eyewitnesses and false confessions. In this paper, I plan to write about Kenneth Ireland. His story shows how wrongful convictions and exonerations are issues in the United States.…

    • 1763 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Falsely confessing to a guilty plea is another way in which wrongful convictions may be mete out. However, if a person is truly innocent, what would be so strong so as to compel them to plead guilty? One logical answer is that when the potential to be convicted of a crime exists and carries a mandatory sentence with it, it may be better to plead to a lesser crime, which may carry a lower sentence and allow for a conditional sentence. Stat on number of wrongful convictions. Even a single wrongful conviction is a travesty and injustice to the…

    • 1521 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Crime is an interesting aspect of our every day society. People choose to commit crimes for various motives and intentions. One thing that will always go hand-in-hand with the concept of crime is the idea of innocence. Innocence is something that we are born with and something that we slowly loose as we mature and learn. In the event of a crime, someone is always guaranteed to experience a loss of innocence whether it is the person committing the crime, the victim, or a witness. The nature of crime is not innocent, therefore the results of a crime will not be innocent. As stated above, there are many different types of crime and these types can be seen through film and literature…

    • 1408 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    United States, the only difference here is that they are focusing more on innocent person can not be convicted by the government, and it’s the government who must have plenty of evidence. This also would include that even if there was slight hesitation or doubt that the person did not commit the crime, then they would get the benefit of the doubt and be let go, since there is not enough proof to convict the suspect. As well that was all traced by early England where it is very important that the presumption of innocence phrase is imposed in trials because as stated by Lord Hale "In some cases presumptive evidence goes far to prove a person guilty, though there be no express proof of the fact to be committed by him, but then it must be very warily pressed, for it is better five guilty persons should escape unpunished than one innocent person should die." (Jeralyn 2003). This statement by Lord Hale is very strong and holds a truth to it, because innocent people should not pay the price of their life for something they are not guilty.…

    • 1187 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some individuals say people are innocent until proven guilty. This is not the case for everybody. For example, in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird there are two characters, Tom Robinson and Boo Radley who are thought of badly by some of the people because they are different than the norm. Due to the fact that Boo and Tom are different then the rest, people tend to jump to conclusions. They assume that they are guilty before they are proven guilty.…

    • 578 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In our judicial system, a person should be “innocent until proven guilty” and will usually only be acquitted or prosecuted when it is proven beyond reasonable doubt, that he or she is innocent or guilty. Lawyers, on either side, will need to build a case for or against their client and will use testimony from eyewitnesses to do so. The merits of using eyewitnesses firsthand accounts are manifold. Firstly, we can figure out the actual sequence of events.…

    • 616 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “A wrongful conviction is when a subsequent investigation finds that an individual who has been tried and found guilty of a crime is, in fact, innocent of that crime” (Bako). A wrongful conviction is not just a simple mistake, lives and families are devastated. This happens more often than people think it does. Even though this person very well may be innocent, it takes years to even appeal their case if they can even get that far. The key issues with wrongful convictions are that prosecutors rely on unreliable evidence such as eyewitness identification of a person that does not really know what he or she saw on that specific date and much, much more. The Innocence project strives to exonerate those whose rights have been unconstitutionally taken away from them through the use of DNA evidence. “The development of DNA testing has allowed the Innocence Project to help exonerate 344 innocent Americans - 20 of whom were on death row (Bako).” These 344 exonerees represent how the American criminal justice system can fail the people she was designed to protect. The innocence project works to raise awareness to the issue our justice system faces when it comes to minorities in particular. Continued research and advocacy, as well as improving the effectiveness of the criminal justice process itself, are all necessary steps to ensuring the innocence of those wrongly accused of a crime. Over 75% of…

    • 1488 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “Innocent until proven guilty” is what our judicial system is based on. Not “innocent based on prior convictions”. Basing a verdict on a person’s prior convictions is just unfair. Everyone should be entitled to a fair trial based on evidence gathered that is related to the crime at hand. If suspects continue to be judge on prior convictions it would make it very hard for them to make positives steps forward.…

    • 428 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    When punishing a person for a crime there is always a chance the person was wrongfully accused.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Proven Guilty

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The principle of "innocent until proven guilty" should not be taken lightly. "Presumption of innocence" means to stress that the prosecution has the duty to prove each charge of the illegal/unlawful act beyond a reasonable doubt and that the accused bears no burden of proof.…

    • 277 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays