Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Ramped-Up Military Engagement

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
167 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Ramped-Up Military Engagement
While the political world continues to focus on the machinations of congressional investigations about Russia (which won't have conclusions drawn for months, if not longer) and where health care goes from here, there's another, arguably more important story going on — ramped-up military engagement.
Trump vowed to "bomb the shit out of them," said he knew more about fighting ISIS than the generals ("believe me") and that the generals had been reduced to "rubble" under President Obama.
Now, it appears Trump is giving the generals more room to run. While some of the tactics are similar to what Obama was doing, there is clearly a ramped-up effort. NPR's Tom Bowman reports that the Trump administration has been more aggressive with increased bombing

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Article II of the United States Constitution gives the president the role of ‘Commander-in-Chief’ of the US’s Armed Forces, and this role provides the basis for rapid and effective decision-making, whilst maintaining the credibility of the USA’s foreign policy on the world stage. However, there are certain constraints on the President’s role as Commander-in-Chief’. One constraint on this power is that only Congress has the power to declare war. Congress can also authorise the president to deploy his country’s armed forces. Since the Constitution was created, Congress has only declared war a total of five times (in both World Wars, the War of 1812, the Mexican War, and the Spanish-American War), and this power has not been used since 1941. These authorisations are ordered by the President however, showing just how interlinked the powers of the president and Congress really are. One example of when the timing of a congressional authorisation can be crucial is the vote on action against Iraq, a few months before the 2002 midterm elections. This congressional authorisation was manipulated by George W Bush, and shows that the president can take advantage of this and make a decision with a Congress that has a majority of his party as members, rather than waiting until after a midterm when he might not be so sure as to have a key decision go his way. The relationship between Congress and the president was confirmed by the War Powers Act of 1973, passed in the aftermath of the Vietnam War.…

    • 538 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    2. In the book “The Gamble: General Petraeus and the American Military Adventure in Iraq.” Mr. Ricks, who covered the military for The Washington Post from 2000 to 2008, takes up the story where he left off in his book “Fiasco.” This volume recounts how Iraq came close to unraveling in 2006, how the Bush administration finally conceded it was off course, and how a new set of commanders headed by Gen. David H. Petraeus and Lt. Gen. Raymond T. Odierno began putting a radically different strategy in place. Elements of the three key takeaways from the article are as follows:…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    adding more knowledge and understanding of the changing situations. Without the education that Petraeus brought to the current conflict that we are in things could have gone a lot different because he had a higher understanding of counterinsurgency and was willing to spend the time to train and implement this understanding to others shows that he truly grasp the bigger pitcher. He is willing to change with the time and ever-changing theater. "he said in 2008 about the war in Iraq. "an Iraq that is at peace with itself, at peace with its neighbors, that has a government that is representative of and responsive to it citizens and is a contributing member of the global community could arguably be called victory"…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    War Thunder stands today at a pivotal point as the introduction of ships and advanced weapons receive more and more attention. One argument that has been around for many years is the possibility of adding the mammoth American bomber, the B-36 Peacemaker. The B-36 was a six engine bomber in service from 1949 – 1959. The massive size of the aircraft and its ability to carry an unheard of amount of ordinance has led to many to state, in the words of Ian Malcolm, “Your scientists were so preoccupied with whether or not they could, they didn’t stop to think if they should;” your scientists meaning Ganjin, the company who owns and develops War Thunder. Due to the current game physics and gameplay, many feel that the B-36 has no hope in being added. The official form has come up with some innovative and intelligent answers to these problems though.…

    • 669 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    On April 9, 1942 the 76,000 defenders of Bataan surrendered to the Japanese forces. The Japanese then forced their captives to march 65 miles to internment camps which took approximately 10 days. Before the captured soldiers arrived to the camps approximately 10,000 of them died or were killed off by the Japanese. The defeat of Bataan was a reminder of the imperfections in American military…

    • 66 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Army Study Guide 2013

    • 8916 Words
    • 36 Pages

    Doctrine 2015 captures the essential lessons learned from 10+ years of persistent conflict. It leverages a…

    • 8916 Words
    • 36 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    proclaims western beliefs and medicine superior to Liberian culture. This again feeds into the issue of lack of trust: and trust between those giving and receiving aid is a significantly large issues because it keeps the provision of aid and communication network efficient. Without trust humanitarian work cannot suffice.…

    • 1112 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Essay On What's At Stake

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages

    From the article The Washington Post by Fred Hiatt it states that “In a speech to the Council on Foreign Relations in November, Hillary Clinton said that the United States needs to wage both “an immediate war against an urgent enemy” and “a generational struggle against an ideology with deep roots.” Starting a war against an enemy would not be a good idea. Because she wants to start a war for no reason, this would create a big problem. She does not need to start a war for no reason and have to kill innocent people. According to the article What’s at stake by Patricia Smith it says “Trump has promised to defeat ISIS by taking away the oil that funds the terrorist group. He also vows to increase the size of the U.S. military and “bomb the hell out of ISIS.” Because he wants to bomb ISIS, he would be bombing other people who are innocent. Just because ISIS is bad doesn’t mean you have to kill other people who are not part of that group. He would be killing some of the good people. The other good people would riot because he would have killed innocent people for no…

    • 712 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Vice President state, “ People of the nation of the United States have already been formed their opinions and will understand the implications to the life and safety of our nation”. This means that the Americans are now prepared for their very own safety and life for their own nation. Overall, the commander chief of the Army and Navy have have directed that all the measures be taken for our defense but the characters who fought in these fight will never be…

    • 480 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The War on Terror vs. Wwi

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Beneath its cloak, the infamous War on Terror garners striking similarities to WWI. The terror attack on Austria-Hungary ignited the War on Terror…nearly a century later. It was not until 1914 that a terrorist attack was utilized to provoke military response. The attack of September 11 is a modern replay of this attack. George W. Bush leapt into the war against Baghdad in 2003 with the same attitude of Woodrow Wilson in the Great War. One of Wilson’s reasons for going to war against Germany was based on his belief that his country’s victory could birth democracy and peace in foreign lands. George Bush agrees with this principle; this is proven in how he attacks Baghdad’s dictatorship with the aspiration to bring democratic change. Both wars appear to be debilitative yet not decisive. The Great War could practically be defined by the word “stalemate.” The general American population has no idea whether or not their country is winning the War on Terror; rather, the war seems to have relatively equal success on both sides and may end in surrender much like its predecessor. With an assassination spark, both of their American leaders shared similar views, and both are indecisive wars.…

    • 996 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Although the Obama administration has begun removing troops from Afghanistan, before doing so, senior military leaders had advised strongly against it. The president is pulling out larger numbers of troops than these senior military commanders advised him. The commanders told the president that security advances were fragile and could easily be turned against them. President Obama may have made the decision under pressure because he promised to do just this in his presidential campaign, to remove the troops from Afghanistan. Seeing as how the President is anxious to be re-elected, he is striving hard to fulfill all his promises made in his original campaign.…

    • 484 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Post War Iraq Conditions

    • 1532 Words
    • 4 Pages

    “I think we ought to bring some of the Iraqis (Republican Guard) here and let them take a good look” General Norman Schwarzkopf…

    • 1532 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    The president, talking about bringing back jobs, strengthening the military and the borders, he said, "We're going to do things that haven't been done for our country for many, many decades.…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Impact of less-lethal weapons and tactics. The effect on modern law enforcement from the use and advancements of intermediate weapons.…

    • 813 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The excerpt, “Killing Time in Iraq” are short daily journal entries written by a soldier named Colby Buzzell. These journals Buzzell writes are the experiences he goes through in Iraq. From car bombs causing high amounts of casualties to guessing what type of explosion went off, what someone may think are intense experiences, Buzzell describes as casual events happening in his daily life. After reading “Killing Time in Iraq”, I argue that Buzzell uses coping mechanisms to minimize the intensity of what is happening around him. People use coping mechanisms to deal with difficult situations. In his journals, he describes events happening in an informal way, resembling things in Iraq to events at home, and does not let situations get into his…

    • 1021 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays