Preview

The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
206 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Pros And Cons Of Supporters Of The US Constitution
The U.S Constitution did not contain the freedoms that are now outlined in the Bill of Rights, when it was signed on Sept. 17, 1787. The issue of a listing of rights that couldn’t be violated upon by the stronger and new national government became the center of ratification debates. People that supported the Constitution argued that many state constitutions already did the job of protecting citizens’ rights. Supporters of the Constitution believed that these rights already existed as natural rights, even though they were not listed. The anti-federalists disagreed and believed there should be a list of rights. They feared that the stronger national government would abuse individual rights. The anti-federalists basically wanted a list of individual
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution
    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Pros And Cons Of The Us Constitution

    Before we knew it as the United States Constitution, we all knew it as the Articles of Confederation. The Articles of Confederation was just too weak as in: each state had one vote in Congress, there was no executive branch to enforce laws passed by Congress, there was no national court system, and etc… Before it could be ratified there was great concern between the delegates that were present at the convention. The main concern they had was the type of legislature. The representatives of larger states wanted the seats in the legislature to be determined by the size of the state. The representatives from the smaller states wanted to have equal representation in Congress. They negotiated on this situation by allowing a bicameral legislature,…

    • 283 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution
    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Dbq4: Ratifying the Constitution

    The major arguments in the debate over the ratification over the U.S Constitution were the rights of individuals verses the rights of the states, the supporters and the opponents, were the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists. Both sides the Federalists and the Anti-Federalists are debating to win the support of our nation.…

    • 390 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787
    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages

    To What Extent Did The Constitutional Convention Of 1787

    Those in favor of the Constitution called themselves Federalists. Those opposing the Constitution and in favor of more power towards the states called themselves Antifederalists. One strong argument for the Antifederalists side was that the Constitution did not protect the liberties of the people (B). The Constitution did not include a bill of rights which displeased many Americans. When it came time to vote, there were many Antifederalists absent at the polls. Because the Federalists had such figures as Washington and Franklin on their side, as well as organized and aggressive strategies, they were victorious in making the Constitution the law of the United States. The final state to help put this into place was New Hampshire. Even though the majority had voted in favor of the Constitution, some states still opposed it, making them susceptible to succession. Through persuasive speeches and constant campaign, the Federalists won over the final states of New York and Virginia. After a huge demand for a bill of rights from the people, as well as the states of Massachusetts, Virginia, and New York, the new government decided one shall be composed…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution
    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The US Constitution

    We can consider United States as new born nation and, United States are proud to have one of the oldest and strongest written constitutions in the world. The idea of new constitution awaken many colonial countries and political system that are running by monarchy system. Whether other countries are following the right step or not, it is undisputable that the U.S. stable Constitution’s ideologies have led people to reconsider how to organize and rebuilt their government political structures.…

    • 507 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constructivism Assignment On The Declaration Of Independence
    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Constructivism Assignment On The Declaration Of Independence

    The Bill of Rights was ratified on December 25 of 1791. Federalism wanted some kind of centralized government and the anti-federalists were willing of a centralized government only if a bill of rights were to be adopted which secured their rights and gave limits on government power. Alexander did not agree with the BOR because he believed that people were going to take advantage of those rights not included in the BOR. James Madison proposed 12 amendments but 2 were dismissed and 10 were ratified. After the Declarations of Independence was ratified congress decided to build a Constitution a factor that influenced that decision was shays rebellion which were the farmers who didn't want to pay there debt making and made riots. Congress believed they needed to strengthen the government therefore the Constitution was created as well as the Bill of Rights which was enacted to protect against giving the central gov too much power and limiting the power of the federal government of the U.S and protected the rights of all citizens. The final form of the constitution was…

    • 1491 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement
    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages

    How And Why Did They Create A Weak Confederal Arrangement

    The Founders’ perceptions were that America was weak and de-centralized. They created a weak, confederal government designed to protect people’s liberties by being to small to be a threat, but it was too small to handle national problems. The differences between the Articles of Confederation and the US Constitution are that one, the US Constitution has a Bill of Rights, the power of the president is addressed and the separation of the branches. This changed occurred to make the government stronger and address the nation’s problems. The Anti-Federalists were a large group who didn’t like the Constitution but didn’t know what they wanted yet and they contributed to the branches. The Federalist were defenders of the constitution and they contributed to the bill of…

    • 446 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Constitution Pros And Cons
    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Constitution Pros And Cons

    On May 14th, 1787 in the state of Philadelphia, the United States founding fathers met at the The Federal Convention to revise the Articles of Confederation, also known as the US first Constitution. On May 25th, after many debates, it was decided that the Convention would draft an entirely new frame of government and after several months of work on September 17th, 1787 the Constitution of the US was created. An integral section of the Constitution is The U.S. Bill of Rights which contains the first 10 amendments to the Constitution.…

    • 448 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists
    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The Pros And Cons Of The Anti-Federalists

    After the constitution was created in 1787, members of the Anti- Federalists believed that they could not ratify the constitution. The Anti- Federalists also believed that the United…

    • 925 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis
    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Anti-Federalists Argumentative Analysis

    Their main concerns included the power that the government held and the natural rights that the people could have. The Constitution was thought to be “radical in this transition; our rights and privileges are endangered, and the sovereignty of the states will be relinquished… The rights of conscience, trial by jury, liberty of the press … are rendered insecure” (Henry 1). Not only were they afraid of falling into another monarchy, they also believed that the rights of each man would be terminated after the Constitution is put into effect. Anti-federalists doubted the effect of the Constitution in the future due to their stances on natural rights for the people and the control that the national government had over the…

    • 271 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Satisfactory Essays

    antifederalists paper
    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages

    antifederalists paper

    One of the reasons the Anti-Federalist refused to ratify the constitution was because it gave too much power to the government. The constitution would allow the government to tax the people much like British government had done so before in England. Another aspect that they did not like was that the Anti-Federalist felt like the government term positions were too long. They feared that those in power would not want to lose such a power and would end up taking over the position they were in. The Anti-Federalist also felt like they gave too much power to the executive branch by giving him the power to veto laws and to have control of the army. They felt like the executive branch could use the position of Commander in chief to oppress the people. The Anti- Federalist felt as if the constitution was being modeled as though the British were once again in control of them like from before.…

    • 556 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    How Did The United States Work In Progress
    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages

    How Did The United States Work In Progress

    Many founding fathers demanded a “bill of rights” that protected the people from the government. The Antifederalists were in favor of the addition of the Bill of Rights to the Constitution because it would promise individual rights and most importantly, to ensure that the citizens would not be treated the way that the British treated them. The Federalists opposed this because believed that the government should have all of the power in a government, and the individual should not have any. In the end, James Madison promised to add a Bill of Rights to the…

    • 778 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Bill Of Rights Vs Anti-Federal Government
    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Bill Of Rights Vs Anti-Federal Government

    One were deemed as Federalist, who sought that broad power and authority should reside in the federal government. While the Anti-Federalist, sought that power should reise in state governments, where it could best protect people’s liberties. Both of which were in continuous conflict with one another, for their vision for America were totally different and wanted a someone from their own group to run government to see fit their best interest at heart. One reason that motivated Anti-Federalist to demand the passing of the Bill of Rights was that they were the minority group. And so they feared that the Federalist, who were ruled the majority would form a much too powerful central government that would infringe their liberties and rights. The Bill of Rights made it so, that the power of the federal government be limited. And that the minority of states in America, be equally represented just as much as the large populated Federalist states.…

    • 815 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Misconceptions Of The Constitution Of 1787
    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The Misconceptions Of The Constitution Of 1787

    What people don’t realize is that the Bill of Rights wasn’t apart of the original Constitution from 1787, and not because the document thought that these “rights” weren’t important, but because, as Hamilton stated, “the Constitution is itself, in every rational sense, and to every useful purpose, a bill of rights.” Think of it this way, when Americans do business with one another, they usually seal the deal with a handshake, but the majority of the time, like good personal relationships, they believe that a good government is followed by a written down agreement after the handshakes. So after the Constitution had been put into effect in 1789, its signers followed up with the first ten amendments, the Bill of Rights (though it does not have a title in the Constitution). Now, there are two things about the Bill of Rights that today’s citizens may not understand. One is that the first ten amendments were emphasizing the “States” rights that pertained more to the minority.…

    • 1038 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Was The Bill Of Rights Important
    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Was The Bill Of Rights Important

    The Bill of Rights is your unalienable rights. You receive these rights at birth and they cannot be taken away. For several states the only way that they would be given the ratification of the constitution was if or when a Federalist supporter promised to add a BIll of Rights. Anti federalist like George Mason feared an overly powerful Government. The first congress assembled in 1789, they immediately started deciding whether or not to add a Bill of Rights.…

    • 437 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Constitutional Convention
    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Constitutional Convention

    The Debate over the constitution was important for the entire United States. Anti Federalist were people who didn't want to ratify the constitution. They didn't want to give the central government more power scared it could turn into Britain. There scared they will cripple the state's power so they have little control. Federalist were people who wanted to ratify the constitution. The federalist wanted a stronger central government so that it has more control over the states. The articles gave the central government with very little power so they want to ratify it. The important Federalist were John Jay, James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. They were Strong supporters of the Constitution . They wrote an 85 page essay in the New York newspaper to get New York citizens to ratify the constitution. That Debating the Constitution was important for our country in its first stages of a of developing a government equal for all and also what didn't work for the articles work for this government.…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More

Related Topics