“Equipped with his five senses, man explores the universe around him and calls the adventure Science,” According to Edwin Powell Hubble. Science has been expanding and more advanced with today's technology. Scientific advancements are also making good and bad effects and not everyone agrees with all of them. Cloning is one of the scientific advancements that is expanding and it happens for many different reasons and it has many different effects on society.…
J. (2015). Cloning humans? Biological, ethical, and social considerations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(29), 8879-8886. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1501798112…
Couples who are battling with infertility can benefit from human cloning. By having a cloned cell implanted into a mother’s uterus, she can possibly have a child that she could not have had through natural procreation. Human cloning can give infertile couples a biological child who received genes from one or both parents. Those who are advocates for reproductive cloning generally give three reasons: The goodness of human freedom, existence, and well-being. People believe that human cloning for reproduction purposes is not making themselves free, but that they are free to practice human cloning. They want to the ability to decide based on their own moral values what is right and wrong with having a cloned child. The goodness of existence has people advocating for the potential cloned child. People argue that once the cloned child is born it would “prefer existence as a clone to no existence at all (PCBE).” No one can verify that the child would believe that statement once they are old enough to think for themselves. The final argument for human cloning is for the goodness of well-being. This argument is for using human cloning to help infertile couples to have a biological child. Other people argue that the well-being is to benefit the genetic quality of the next generation by ensuring that all diseases and disorders that the child may inherit are removed…
The embryonic cloning debate touches down ethical issues that are each debatable. One is the debate whether it is healthy and or ethical to obtain eggs from a woman for stem cells. It calls for hormone treatment and surgery. With all surgeries, there is always a risk, but with this one it’s an ethical debate if it is right or not. Another reason why is that people are afraid that we will fall down a slippery slope into human cloning or human organ harvesting.…
Therapeutic cloning is the transfer of nuclear material isolated from a somatic cell into an enucleated oocyte in the goal of deriving embryonic cell lines with the same genome as the nuclear donor. Somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) products have histological compatibility with the nuclear donor, which circumvents, in clinical applications, the use of immunosuppressive drugs with heavy side-effects. Therapeutic cloning is also often tied to ethical considerations concerning the source, destruction and moral status of IVF embryos based on the argument of potential. Legislative and funding issues are also addressed. Future considerations would include a distinction between therapeutic…
This paper wills discuss Leon Kass’s conclusion that reproductive and therapeutic cloning of human embryos is unethical. It will also converse the steps in Kass 's argument for his conclusion and will talk about the strengths and weaknesses of this argument?…
Pulitzer Prize winner and renown columnist, Charles Krauthammer, analyzes the controversial topic of cloning; providing readers with an ethical perspective via explicit research and inquiry in his academic article, “Crossing Lines.” Taking an intellectual and pensive approach as he examines noteworthy ethical concerns beginning with the least complex—like the principle belief that life begins at conception; thus, the manipulation of an embryo is intentional disfiguration and maltreatment of an underdeveloped child—to the far more convoluted—such as applying the commandant, “thou shalt not kill” to the possibly of embryo mass production in the near future; where embryos will be readily disposed of once they’ve served their purpose. Krauthammer…
Macklin, R., “Why We Should Regulate—But Not Ban—the Cloning of Human Beings,” Testimony presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Macklin, R., "Splitting embryos on the slippery slope: Ethics and public policy," Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 4: 209-226, 1994. Mill, J.S., On Liberty (Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill Publishing, 1859). National Institutes of Health, Report of the Human Embryo Research Panel (Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health, 1994). Nussbaum, M.C., “Aristotelian social democracy,” inLiberalism and the Good 203, R. Bruce Douglass, et al., (eds.), pp. 217-226, 1990. Parfit, D., Reasons and Persons (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984). Posner, R, Sex and Reason (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1992). Radin, M., “Reflections on Objectification,”65 Southern California Law Review 341 (November 1991). Radin, M., “The Colin Ruagh Thomas O 'Fallon Memorial Lecture on Personhood,” 74 Oregon Law Review 423 (Summer 1995). Rhodes, R. "Clones, harms, and rights,"Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 4:285-290, 1995. Robertson, J.A., "A Ban on Cloning and Cloning Research is Unjustified," Testimony Presented to the National Bioethics Advisory Commission, March 14, 1997. Robertson, J.A., "The question of human cloning,"Hastings Center Report 24:6-14, 1994. Robertson, “The scientist’s right to research: A constitutional analysis,51 Southern California Law Review 1203, 1977. Rothenberg, K., Testimony before the Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, March 12, 1997. Schwartz, H., The Culture of Copy (New York: Zone Books, 1996).…
The moral dilemma of embryonic stem cell research is: either the embryo is a human being or it’s not a human being, a person's belief can help alter their decision on being for or against the research, cloning could be the answer to saving a life, and the potential the embryonic research can have will make a big impact on the world. To say that an embryo is or is not a human depends on the person and the concept they have on when a life is actually started. Many say that it starts at the embryo, where others debate that it starts at the first heartbeat, and some try and look at the scientific view of the research. No matter what people think, all sides have a good argument for and against the topic of when life is actually started and if stem cell research should and should not be used (Eurostemcell). To come to a final decision on the topic of embryonic stem cell research, society has to look at both sides.…
The cloning of any species, whether it be human or non-human, is ethically and morally wrong. Scientists and ethicists have debated the implications of human and non-human cloning extensively since 1997 when scientists at the Roslin Institute in Scotland produced a cloned sheep named Dolly. No direct conclusions have been made, but strong arguments state that cloning of both human and non-human species results in harmful physical and psychological effects on both groups. I will address the issue of cloning and its ethical and moral implications. Cloning of human beings results in severe psychological effects in the cloned child. Cloning is morally and ethically wrong, thus, this type of research should not be continued.…
Today, one of the largest debates in the scientific world is on the topic of cloning, genetic cloning, that is. As beneficial to our world as this may be, everything has its drawbacks. There are two types of cloning, reproductive and therapeutic. Reproductive cloning consists of reproducing a whole organism through a process called somatic cell nuclear transfer. This process works by taking the nucleus out of a donor egg and inserting a nucleus from a cell that has been obtained from the organism that is supposed to be cloned. This newly created cell begins to divide, using electrical impulses. It is then placed inside the body of the host organism and eventually divides enough to create a clone of the donor…
In his article “Human Cloning Debate. Why do it? Who’d be hurt? Should it be legal?” Peter Kendall questions whether human cloning is appropriate or rather ethically and morally not acceptable. A debate that occupied scientists and ethicists for years is how much mankind should mess with nature when it comes to human reproduction and the issues that may arise.…
Cloning is one of the controversial topics in this day and age, and with the media and technology implanting the idea of cloning in our psyche by using it in various films and fiction novels some people started to develop right and left views on this purely scientific topic as some believe that cloning is destructive and will lead to bad consequences to our nature as humans while other people believe that cloning is something that we will likely benefit from and can help us cure different diseases. I will be writing about two articles. “Narcissus Cloned” which was published in 1994 by John Conley who is a professor of philosophy at Fordham University and his view point on cloning is negative and argues how cloning bad for us and against our humanity and how is cloning could have negative effects as it is against our human nature. Instead, the article “The Moral Imperative for Human Cloning” which was published in 2004 by the Scottish embryologists Ian Wilmut talks about the bright side of cloning and how cloning could benefit the health care industry immensely. In this paper, The two articles convey their opposing arguments through differences in strategy used to persuade readers, justifications used to support their arguments and…
ETHICAL ISSUES UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CHUMAN CLONING ULTURAL ORGANIZATION HUMAN CLONING ETHICAL ISSUES UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION Graphic design (brochure): Jérôme Lo Monaco Graphic design (cover): Marion Lo Monaco Photo credits: Page 8 Image of Nuclear Transfer, Roslin Institute Page 9 Cloned Sheep “Dolly” and its Surrogate Mother, Roslin Institute Page 10 Cloned Cat “CC”, Texas A&M University, College of Veterinary medicine Cloned Mice, University of Hawaii Cloned Mule “Idaho Gem”, Phil Schofield/University of Idaho Cloned Calves, University of Tennessee Cloned Pigs, Revivicor, Inc. (formerly PPL Therapeutics, Inc.), Blacksburg, Virginia Cloned Rabbits by Jean-Paul Renard research team, INRA/Bertrand Nicolas Illustrations: Jérôme Lo Monaco Further information: Secretariat of the Bioethics Section Division of Ethics of Science and Technology Social and Human Sciences Sector United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) 1, rue Miollis, 75732 Paris Cedex 15, France Tel.…
privately funded scientists to halt such work until the newly formed National Bioethics Advisory Commission could review the “troubling” ethical and legal implications. The Director-General of the World Health Organization (WHO) characterized human cloning as “ethically unacceptable as it…