In the play, Julius Caesar, written by William Shakespeare, the plot uncovers several different characters: the tragic hero, Brutus, the anti-hero, Cassius, and the hero, Mark Antony. These three characters continue to display fitting attributes throughout the entire play. All of them are defined as a protagonist and they endure changes and grow as the play progresses.
Brutus acts out of a desire to limit the self-serving aspects of his actions, ultimately dooming himself, defining him as the tragic hero. For example, he ignores Cassius’ consul and allows Antony to speak to the crowd at the funeral, creating tension between himself and the Roman people. By doing this, Brutus identifies himself as a bad guy in the eyes of the public and upsets Cassius. This fault could be identified as pride within himself, making it impossible for other to assist him. In addition, Brutus self-righteously condemns Cassius for his form of fund raising that Brutus believes to be detestable. This action shakes their friendship and distances them from one another. Brutus often demonstrates self-righteousness in his endless search for what is good and right. Overall, Brutus brings his downfall upon himself by seeking gain for him and the Roman citizens.
The anti-hero, Cassius, in Julius Caesar is described as lacking any heroic qualities. For instance, Cassius, who claimed to be Caesar’s friend, manipulated him into attending his own murder. By playing with Caesar’s pride, he was able to convince Caesar that he would become a failure if he did not attend. Manipulation is far from any kind of heroic attribution, showing who Cassius really is. Furthermore, the crowd is convinced by Cassius, who bared false witness, that the murder was a noble act. The lie continues to resonate with the Roman people until Antony’s speech, which conveyed the idea that Cassius was an anti-hero. Lying is never seen as being a noble action, which gives Cassius a bad reputation from the beginning of the play. Cassius continues to display several anti-hero characteristics throughout the play.
Mark Antony, who never separates his private affairs from his public actions, proves strong in the areas Brutus is weak, making him a persuasive public speaker, dedicated, and the perfect hero in Julius Caesar. For example, he continues to show his loyalty to Caesar during the well-known funeral speech. Putting his fear aside, he reminded the crowd of the great accomplishments Caesar had made. Antony also told the Romans of the love Caesar and the people shared. Additionally, Mark Antony continued on his quest to avenge Caesar’s wrongful death. He, joined by Octavious, fought Brutus and Cassius until the death on behalf of their friend. The victory, claimed by Antony and Octavious, is a great honor to the late Caesar and the Roman’s. The dedication to what is right, displayed by Mark Antony, created him to be easily liked by the reader and a prime example of a hero. Overall, the three protagonists created a different aspect to the play, making the reader become attached in a new way and create a unique bond. Brutus, Cassius, and Antony prove strong and weak in vastly different areas, linking them together throughout the writing of Shakespeare.
You May Also Find These Documents Helpful
-
Protagonists keep the plot of a story going, they are the ones we cling to and hope to see win in the end or die trying. In the outstanding play Julius Caesar, by William Shakespeare, many characters play a very important role while many others are there simply to die. But the question still remains. Who exactly is the main character? Julius Caesar or noble Brutus? Both show the great acts of a protagonist, along with being the main eye throughout the story which would prove them to be the best choice for the role. They both flow through the story like hot butter, but not all butter lands on toast.…
- 237 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
Julius Caesar played an important role for Ancient Rome. Julius was a Roman statesmen who lead the Roman Republic to spread around and rise Ancient Rome. He did so many differences to the city of Rome when he became dictator, and most of the people loved his acts and his good leadership. Julius gave the people 5 different types of reforms, which the people were happy to have an considered him as a great leader. During Julius Caesar's lifetime, he had held just about every important title in the Roman Republic including consul tribune of the people, and including a high commander of the army. He suggested new laws the improve the city of Rome, most of them were approved by the Senate to make them into official laws. He reorganized the army…
- 152 Words
- 1 Page
Satisfactory Essays -
There is a large amount of differences between the play interpretation of Julius Caesar and what really happened. For instance, Brutus in the play was extremely different than real life Brutus. In the play, he was best friends with Caesar-well, until he killed him. However, in real life, Brutus hated Caesar. He was never supportive of Caesar, and truthfully never loved him.(Musaj and Prezi Inc.) In Julius Caesar by William Shakespeare, he uses Brutus’s strong love of Rome, his honor, and his willing to do anything for the good of Rome to show that Brutus is the tragic hero.…
- 469 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Cassius is able to assess his audience and use that to his advantage. In this case, his audience is Brutus, a thoughtful if slightly oblivious patrician and friend of Caesar’s. Brutus has a strong love for Rome,…
- 1059 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Within The Tragedy of Julius Caesar, it is argumentative that Julius Caesar appears to fit the definition of a tragic hero, however it is also believed by a large sum of individuals that Marcus Brutus is found to be a more fitting character to the definition of a tragic hero. Written by William Shakespeare, The Tragedy of Julius Caesar is based upon a plot which revolves around the common theme of a tragedy, which can be perceived as a dramatic composition that often involves verses as well as a death of a high class individual, during the Elizabethan era.…
- 680 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
The story of Julius Caesar is a time period where Caesar was the noblest men of all of Rome. It's a famous time were there was a lot of tragic events. For example in act 3 scene 1 Cesar is stabbed and killed by the conspirators at the senate. The fall of their King was a tragic event. Also Brutus committing suicide who was also one of the noblest man of Rome. A tragedy is a powerful impact in a story. Which in ties in with a tragic hero who is the main protagonist {character} in the story but they will most likely will not achieve their ends they will most likely die in trying. Brutus in my opinion is a tragic hero in the story of Julius Caesar. Brutus is a character that we learn about who he really is. We learn what his motives is in the…
- 554 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
However, Brutus remains noble and refuses to take more lives than necessary, stating, “Let’s be sacrificers, not butchers, Caius… we shall be called purgers, and not murderers” (page 51). While others join the conspiracy for their own personal ambitions, much like how Cassius has monetary gains at the sole forefront of his mind when he commits the murder, Brutus is concerned only for his country and kills Caesar for that reason: so that the republic will last longer without a dictatorial threat looming in the distance. When Brutus commits suicide, his final words are: “Caesar, now be still, I killed not thee with half so good a will,” meaning that the would-be dictator’s death is nobler than his and that Caesar’s death is now avenged. At the end of the play, Antony praises Brutus and calls him “the noblest Roman of them all” (page 163); when one is praised by their enemy, it shows that they are well-respected, even by their foes.…
- 831 Words
- 4 Pages
Good Essays -
1.1) it is important to have a positive relationshop with children and young people because it will help you and both children and ypung people to have a happier relationahip with each other and make the enviroment much better. With children its good to have a positive relationship so that they can get to no you, get use to the enviroment and so that they feel safe and happy. With young peopleit is good to have a good positive relationship with them so that they again get to no you, get use to enviroment and that their happy and safe. It is imporant that…
- 708 Words
- 3 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
What the citizens of Rome saw was only the persona he cultivated to appear humble. But Brutus says of Caesar, “I have not known when his [Caesar’s] affections swayed/ More than his reason,” (II, i, l 19 - 21). Although Brutus is afraid of what Caesar may become if he were to gain more power, he knows that Caesar is not abusing it as of that point. His arrogance is plain to see, but Caesar still makes reasonable decisions based on what is best for the people of Rome and not himself and doesn’t hold any biases. This would suggest that Caesar does in fact follow a moral code and strives to actually be a good person, which is a characteristic of the Shakespearean tragic hero. Cassius and the other senators created the conspiracy mainly because of envy of him acting like he is not human like them because of his power and ambition instead of fear of what the citizens of Rome might suffer if he were to gain more…
- 1105 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Cassius makes the assumption “Than must I think you would not have it so,”. Displaying Brutus’s uneasy feelings towards Caesar makes Brutus more aware of this idea and opens it up to discussion. By doing this Cassius can expand on the fearfulness of Caesar. To do this he claims, “I was born free as Caesar; so were you: We both have fed as well, and we can both Endure the winter’s cold as well as he,”. This statement of equality revealed that Caesar is an equal to them and he has no reason to be placed on a pedestal of honor. With this claim that Caesar is not worthy to be king, Cassius tells Brutus that they should be ashamed of what they have allowed to happen in Rome. He calls Brutus to bring Rome back to the way it should be. Since Brutus is seen as a man of honor, he feels compelled to carry on this and do something about Caesar. Using claims such as these that will provoke Brutus are important and give more reasoning for the killing of…
- 431 Words
- 2 Pages
Satisfactory Essays -
“For let the gods so speed me as I love the name of honor more than I fear death. (I.ii.180)” Marcus Brutus, the tragic hero of Julius Caesar, is a widely admired, honorable leader and senator of Rome. Many follow Brutus due to his honest nature, though this nature leads to his death.…
- 712 Words
- 3 Pages
Good Essays -
Cassius is one of the sly conspirators out for Caesar. He feels that Caesar will grow too ambitious, so he must be stopped before he's out of control. Therefore, he plans to murder Caesar. In order to make his murder look like a sacrifice for Rome and not a bloody plot, he must get Brutus in on his plan. With Brutus' good reputation the murder would be looked upon as a good deed. In order to appeal to Brutus, Cassius disguises his personality. In guise of a devoted friend, Cassius flatters Brutus to his fullest extent. He says, ."..Thoughts of great value worthy of cogitations/Tell me, good Brutus, Can you see your face?" (1.2. ). By pretending to flatter Brutus, Cassius hopes Brutus will join the conspiracy. Cassius plans ends up working and Brutus fears that Caesar will eventually become power hungry. Cassius is pleased that his false words have had an effect on Brutus, and he states to himself, "I am glad that my weak words/Have struck but thus much show of fire from Brutus" (1.2. ). Cassius' appeared to be considerate of Brutus' feelings, but in reality Cassius was really stabbing him in the back and "forcing" him to join the…
- 1118 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
Brutus is a patriotic middle aged man, who truly cares about the well being of his fellow people. “I do fear, the people, Choose Caesar for their king,” says Brutus. (Act 1 scene 2, 80) Despite Brutus’ friendship with Caesar, he much rather prefers Rome to remain a republic. He puts the masses before his own friendship. Brutus in return, is seen as trustworthy and reliable by the people. Indeed, Brutus is a noble man. Brutus says, “For let the gods so speed me as I love, the name of honor more than I fear death.” (act 1 scene 2, 90) He values honesty, fairness and balance. He is willing to lay his own life for what he believes. He is passionate and will do as much as what is needed so that what he believes is right will shine through. Brutus is easily swayed by Cassius in Act 1 scene 2. “Brutus and Caesar—what should be in that “Caesar”?” says the sly Cassius. (Act 2 scene 2, 140) After Cassius’ speech, Brutus considers the proposition of plotting against Caesar and does not shun the idea at all. Brutus is so willing to believe in his worthiness and Cassius’ call for action. He fails to truly listen to the Romans because he is too engrossed in doing what he believes is best for them.…
- 380 Words
- 2 Pages
Good Essays -
Julius Caesar, the Tragic Hero in this story, was loved by the citizens, but killed for the greater good of Rome. Walking down the Roman streets you’d hear his followers yelling, “Hail Caesar!” This proves, how he was greatly admired by his people, and goes to show what would result from his death; angered citizens and war between the two factions. During his crowning, this was chanted by the crowd showing this was what they believed was good for Rome. After Caesar's brutal assassination, Mark Antony gave a speech at his funeral stating, “I thrice presented him a kingly crown, which he did thrice refuse” This is important because, if he was power hungry he wouldn’t of denied being the Emperor for so long.…
- 1072 Words
- 5 Pages
Good Essays -
This is a perplexing question to which there is no simple answer. In the same way that Shakespeare titled a play The Merchant of Venice, when the merchant, Antonio, is not the primary character in the play; in Julius Caesar, Caesar is not primary to the action that continues throughout the play. In both of these plays, however, the title character (in this case, Caesar) serves as the catalyst for action that is central to the play.As for Brutus, the term "hero" can be misleading. We tend to think of a hero as someone who swoops in and saves the day, someone we would like to emulate. A super-hero is a good example of this sort of hero. However, if you consider the definition of tragic hero as it was described by the Greek philosopher Aristotle in hisPoetics, then we have a very different definition of "hero."As defined by Enotes, a tragic hero is the main character in a tragedy. The modern use of the term usually involves the notion that such an hero makes an error in his actions that leads to his or her downfall.. . .Aristotle . . is quite clear in his pronouncement that the hero's misfortune is not brought about "by vice and depravity but by some error of judgment." In fact, in Aristotle's Poetics it is…
- 5064 Words
- 21 Pages
Powerful Essays