It was not …show more content…
In 1972, Sherbert v. Vener exempted Seventh-Day Adventists from certain unemployment insurance regulations, but in 1990 the court ruled in Employment Division v. Smith that the Free Exercise Clause does not give religious organizations the right to exemptions from neutral laws. This case was particularly important because it inspired Congress to pass the Religious Freedom Restoration Act three years later (Chopko, 1992). The case involved two Native Americans who consumed illegal drugs for religious reasons. Interestingly, the first time the U.S. Supreme Court received this case, they sent it back to the Oregon Supreme Court to decide whether “sacramental use of illegal drugs violated Oregon's state drug laws” (“Employment Division”). The state court decided the state drug law violated the Native Americans’ religious freedom and, specifically, the free exercise clause. Then it went back to the U.S. Supreme Court and they reversed the state’s decision (“Employment