The Regent Park Project Case Study

Toronto is a densely populated city in need of space to expand its housing availability. Increasingly lodging helps to make society and develop change. “The Regent Park project is an example of a distinctly Canadian application of the social-mix model” (Bucerius and Thompson 3). Organizers work with the Mayor of the city, designated authorities, and other officials to make quality housing. In the time of 2003, the city affirmed the revitalization of Regent Park. In 2006 the city passed a social improvement design and the demolition began. This implies turning what was once exclusively a social housing experiment into an independent blended area, a multi-utilized community. The Government has planed to reconnect the roadways, build parks, and other community resources. Official Regent Park is supplanting their 2000 lodging units with 700 new more reasonable ones and 3000 market condominium units, townhouse and mid lofts according to Heather Loney. For The cost of living in these units would be out of the range of the current inhabitants. The neighbourhood is expected to see “12,500 occupants in a mixed-use community” (Loney pp 36). Gentrification is the purchasing and revamping of houses and stores in urban neighborhoods, it brings about expanded property estimations and dislodges lower wage families and independent ventures.
Mixed-income redevelopment has become common scheme over the past couple of decades according to Martine August.
“This typically involves the demolition of public housing and its replacement with newly built (but usually fewer) social units” (August 26). However not everyone is pleased with the new revelation of Regent Park. The redevelopment of Regent Park has created tension. Therefor when mixing different levels of class such as income and living inequality this causes problems. Tenants feel estranged from condominium. This appears to be upsetting long-established codes of conduct in Regent Park” (Bucerius and Thompson, par.
31