Preview

The Reign Of Terror In George Orwell's Animal Farm

Better Essays
Open Document
Open Document
1181 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Reign Of Terror In George Orwell's Animal Farm
The year is 1917 and the Russian Revolution had just taken place the Czars were overthrown and the Communist party takes over. At this time, it puts into power Vladimir Lenin and Joseph Stalin is the leader of the Communist party creating the USSR. When Lenin dies in 1924 Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky are fighting for power Stalin spreads lies about Trotsky causing him to flee to Moscow, thus giving Stalin control of the USSR in the year 1929. The book Animal Farm by George Orwell shows in an allegory style the way the Russian Revolution happened and how Joseph Stalin came to power and the way he treated the people of Russia. During Stalin’s years of power, he used a “Reign of Terror” to keep his control of the Russian people in control at …show more content…
Kirov was an orphan that was grew up and believed fully in the Revolution of 1917 he was in fact mentored personally by Joseph Stalin (histclo.com). However, after the famine that accord killing millions of people he no longer believed in what Stalin was doing and spoke out against him thus causing Stalin to ask him to move to Moscow from Leningrad so that he could keep a better eye on him and he wouldn’t be able to keep talking out against him (histclo.com). When Kirov was first assassinated the blame was put on the two-party heads of the “Trotskyite-Zinovievite terrorist center” said A. Lengyel. Stalin used this as an opportunity to get rid of all those who opposed/ spoke out against him in the government and then with the local common people who dared to speak out against him. To find these people Stalin “appointed Nikolai Ezhov as the head of the NKVD, secret police, in 1936” (A. Lengyel). Stalin chose well for his new “attack dogs” like shown in the book Animal Farm by George Orwell they took in anyone that spoke anything ill against Stalin and his regime so says A. Lengyel. It was so good that in 1937 “most of the Red Army general staff either disappeared or were executed” (A. Lengyel). Once you were arrested though you weren’t just put in jail you were tortured until you confessed to something didn’t matter if it was …show more content…
One girl, Antonina Golovina who grew up in Siberia with her family after being exiled, years later once was allowed back into the USSR she never spoke bad against Stalin or the communist party due to the fear instilled in her at such a young age as told to us by weebly.com. All those who lived during Stalin’s time lived in fear of the ruler and didn’t dare speak out against in any way to ensure that they didn’t meet the fate of so many others who were never seen or heard of again. They lived this way even after Stalin’s death. Thus showing in the greatest terms Stalin was no hero he was a monster that forced his people into loving him with the use of his fearful tactics against them and those who dared go against him for power.
Works Cited
Lengyel, A. "Russia's." 20th-Century Russia Fall 2014. N.p., 11 Oct. 2014. Web. 13 Apr. 2017.
Orwell, George. Animal Farm. Essex: Pearson, 2014. 2003. Web. 13 Apr. 2017.
"Stalin's Reign of Terror." War and Genocide in Children's Literature. N.p., n.d. Web. 13 Apr. 2017.
"Stalin's Russia, 1928–41." Helicon Encyclopedia of World History, 2010, History Study Center, . 13 Apr. 2017.
"Stalin: The Great Terror (1934-38)." Biography : Joseph Stalin The Great Terror. N.p., 26 Apr. 2004. Web. 13 Apr.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    good for nothing. Stalin ordered someone to kill Trotsky. “The NKVD(his guards/soldiers) folders assassinated Stalin's rival Leo Trotsky”(grade saver) which would be Snowball but the only difference was in the book snowball didn’t get assassinated he just got run out of the farm you the dogs which would be the NKVD.Snowball would have been the guy who really was trying to look out for the working class. Like Napoleon, Stalin kept tight control over the media. He commissioned paintings of himself surrounded by adoring children. He essentially re-wrote Russian history, inserting himself into the Russian Revolution of 1917 and later suggesting that he was solely and personally responsible for winning World War II. And, at the same time he was making himself into Russia's #1 Savior, he wanted to make sure that he was remembered for his modesty.…

    • 625 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The book illustrates with words the Stalinist Revolution and what happened along the way with Hitler and Lenin. Supremacy, the will all rulers have, but never achieve; learn how Stalin rose over Lenin, then the war against Hitler, followed by a Cold War with the U.S., and leading into another Cold War all in the time of World War II. The Title Stalin’s Curse really has something to hide; the many deaths that lay behind the difficult times of wars, the troubles facing the dictator straight on and the curse, which he set upon the land in his ruling and at the moment of his…

    • 755 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: J. Barros & R. Gregor. Double Deception: Stalin, Hitler, and the Invasion of Russia. Chicago: Northern Illinois University Press, 1995.…

    • 2524 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    ‘Years of Russia, the USST and the Collapse of Soviet Communism’ David Evans, Jane Jenkins…

    • 1037 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Riasanovsky, Nicholas V. 1993. "A History of Russia." New York, United States of America: Oxford University Press.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Stalin and Purges

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages

    The aim of this investigation is to assess how the purges of 1934-38 helped Stalin preserve his power in the Soviet Union. In order to evaluate this, the investigation assesses Stalin’s role in relation to the purges, as well as their purpose. An analysis of this should indicate the extent to which the purges were successful, and their contribution to Stalin’s power. In the section entitled Evaluation of Sources, two sources used for this investigation (The Great Terror: A Reassessment, and Origins of the great purges: the Soviet Communist Party reconsidered, 1933-1938) are evaluated according to their values, limitations, origins, and purposes.…

    • 1516 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    But i believe its fully his personality that fuelled the terror of the purges. Mainly because of him becoming a very paranoid person. He believed that his physician was out to murder him, so he called for him to be killed (doctor’s plot) this fuelled the hatred towards the Jews as people believed they wanted to ruin Stalin. One of the reasons why his personality was spiralling was the suicide of his second wife. After this, his brutality increased even further. He no longer held time for people in his way, he was suspicious of everybody. An example of his evil acts was when he was working in his office. He had a pet parrot in a cage; it once imitated his voice so he reached in and killed the bird with his pipe. So this shows he had lost all patience with anybody or anything.…

    • 295 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Khrushchev’s vilification of Stalin in his address to the Twentieth Party Congress was meticulous in detailing precise failures of his predecessor’s rule. Above all, Khrushchev strongly elaborated on Stalin’s extremities, especially the cult of personality that he had built up over the years. The speech also in turn attacked ‘Stalinist repressions, arrests, terror and murders…[and] for bungling foreign affairs and mishandling the war’. Despite this, Khrushchev was cautious in limiting his other criticisms of Stalin, and it was this focus on him as an individual rather than of the overall Soviet system that defined the boundaries of acceptable criticism. As such, the speech sought to condemn Stalin without endangering the party’s validity or the system that had indeed allowed Khrushchev to rise to power.…

    • 1064 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Best Essays

    After the February revolution on 1917 which saw the abdication of the Tsar, Russia was in turmoil. It had gone (in a matter of days) from being one of the most repressed countries in the world to being totally free with nobody in any real position of power or authority, and this was a massive change for the population of Russia. As a result of this confusion two bodies were set up to temporarily control Russia until a constituent Assembly could be elected. These two bodies were the Provisional government, (made up of leading Liberal parties, and Kadets), and the Petrograd Soviets (made up of workers, soldiers, socialist revolutionaries, and had both Menshevik and Bolshevik members.) However this reign did not last long as in October of the same year the Bolsheviks seized the Tauride Palace overthrowing the Provisional government (PG) in the name of the Petrograd Soviet. There are many reasons to why the PG did not manage to consolidate its power; primarily there were a lot of internal problems that gave them a big disadvantage. However there were also external pressures from the peasants, workers and the war that the PG could simply not cope with. As historians have studied the question in depth different schools of thought have been established. The Structuralist School believes that the PG was doomed from the beginning, because of the problems they faced such as Dual Power, the War and…

    • 5081 Words
    • 21 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Best Essays

    The Russian Empire was a state that existed from 1721 until the Russian Revolution of 1917. It stretched from Europe to the Pacific Ocean and included people with diverse cultures and traditions.2 Russia was a land of disparity and contradiction by the turn of the 20th century. It was caught in between two worlds: the traditional world of the peasantry and the modern world of the westernized elite.3 As these two world coexisted, their values, culture, and way of life extremely differed. Regardless of the persistence of a rural society and economy, Russia became exposed to profound urban and industrial growth during the second half of the 19th century. 4Many peasants surfed…

    • 2030 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Good Essays

    Stalin did face opposition from his own party about the conduct of the Five-Year Plans. A possible rival was Sergei Kirov, the Leningrad Party boss who was assassinated in 1934. Kirov’s death was used as justii cation for the existence of counter-revolutionary plots.…

    • 1007 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Lenin - Stalin Comparison

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Khrushchev, Nikita. "De-Stalinization speech." Revolutions in Russia and China. 4th ed Ed. June Grasso et al. New York: McGaw-Hill. 2000. 75-90…

    • 1463 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, Stalin was known for some terrible things. He was a dictator that killed innocent people. Stalin turned peasants into a military superpower killing 20 million innocent people (“Joseph Stalin, 2009”). He got involved with revolutionary politics and criminal activities (breaking laws) in his youth (“Joseph Stalin, 2009”). He was general of socialist party in the 1900’s after being was kicked out of a school where Stalin was learning to be a priest (“BBC- I Wonder -Joseph Stalin: National Hero or Cold Blooded Murderer?”). All of his enemies (people who crossed him) were sent to labor camps or to be executed for no apparent reason; Stalin just believed that some people should die or don’t deserve a life.…

    • 526 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Maus

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages

    As we know, Vladek wasn’t a big fan of communism. In fact, he was even against it. Resisting the beliefs of Joseph Stalin was very dangerous,…

    • 742 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the series of events and the characters in George Orwell’s Animal Farm parallel perfectly with that of the Russian Revolution. Although both sides had it’s pros and cons, ultimately, the animals were better off under the rule of the pigs. Being that the animals were better under the pigs,…

    • 574 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays