Preview

The Relationship Between Rudolf Hess And Adolf Hitler

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
923 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Relationship Between Rudolf Hess And Adolf Hitler
A man’s best friend is often describe as a dog for various reasons. Dogs are often loved for their championship throughout life and all the events that come with it. When you think of dogs, the word “loyal” commonly emerges into one’s mind. Loyalty is described as showing constant support to an individual or group during the good and bad times. During the Holocaust, there were many loyal supporters. Many people supported different sides; Britain, France, Australia, Canada, and the Nazis. One Nazi officer known for his extreme loyalty towards the Nazi Party and Adolf Hitler was Rudolf Hess. Throughout the Holocaust Rudolf Hess played the role of a perpetrator in the crimes committed because of his loyalty towards Adolf Hitler and the Nazi Party, …show more content…
They both already had found for Germany in World War 1. Despite this, they did not formally meet until years after the war in prison (Costello 1). During their prison time, a few events occurred that helped bond the relationship between Rudolf Hess and Adolf Hitler. During their prison time, both men agreed the Jews were to blame for the loss of World War 1 (Low 107). This similar perspective laid the foundation for their growing relationship. In addition to that, Hess took dictation for and edited Adolf Hitler’s book, Mein Kampf (“Hess, Rudolf” 1). This was the icing on the cake to their relationship, Rudolf Hess now knew the struggles in which Adolf Hitler had experienced. With all this, Rudolf Hess was ready to give up his very bright future as a scholar and dedicate his life to serving Adolf Hitler (Low …show more content…
Rudolf Hess ruthlessly murder or helped murder millions of Jews. During the time before he flew his peace mission, he killed like a executioner; mindlessly and regularly. Up until Rudolf Hess’ flight for peace with Britain, he supported all of Germany’s aggressive actions towards Jews and their communities (Low 5). He never had any second thoughts about his support with the Nazi forces or their plans of exterminating the Jews. The Nuremberg trials is where Rudolf Hess first expressed his lack of pity to those he hurt and killed. This is expressed by, “In his final speech to the court, he said ‘...I regret nothing. If I were standing once more at the beginning I should act once again as I did then, even if I knew that at the end I should be burnt at the stake…’” (Catherwood and Horvitz 2). Despite all the consequences, a lifetime in prison, Rudolf Hess would do it all again. He has no pity for the families he
Continue Reading
View Writing Issues

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Why Is Jonathan Edward's Morality Is Better Than Heinrich Himmler
    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page

    Why Is Jonathan Edward's Morality Is Better Than Heinrich Himmler

    Jonathan Bennett considers Jonathan Edward’s morality was worse than Himmler’s because Heinrich Himmler contributed to destroy and assassinate four and half million of the Jewish race and several other million gentiles. In Himmler’s case, bad morality has won over sympathy. As result, the hidden emotions have caused him to become sick. He suffered nervous and physical disabilities. In Jonathan Edwards’s case he felt giving up sympathies will interfere with a one’s principles.…

    • 215 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Similarities Between Hitler And Joseph Stalin
    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Similarities Between Hitler And Joseph Stalin

    Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin were two of the most evil men in history, responsible for countless atrocities. They had many similarities as well. Both men committed genocide to further their political agenda, massively improved the militaries of their respective countries, had their own different groups of secret police and spies, and finally they were both tyrannical totalitarian dictators. Despite sharing many similarities, their government structure and political philosophies were very different. Adolf Hitler was a Fascist who believed in a highly centralized government with himself at the top of the pyramid. Joseph Stalin was a communist who believed in collectivism and instilling fear into his political opposition. Although there are…

    • 1278 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Similarities Between Hitler And Stalin
    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Similarities Between Hitler And Stalin

    Although Hitler and Stalin both employed a special police force to help control the country under their totalitarian rule, Hitler’s force relied on having secret police everywhere while Stalin relied on having individuals report their friends and coworkers. To control citizens by spying on them and imprisoning them, Hitler employed the use of the Himmler’s SS and the Gestapo political police. The SS initially started off as Hitler’s personal bodyguards, but under Himmler’s command, they evolved into a more powerful force, who were eventually responsible for the Final Solution. The Gestapo, while somewhat similar to the SS, were Hitler’s secret police, who focused on taking down any opposing political opponents, primarily those who went underground after the creation of the one party system in Germany. The Gestapo were responsible for the capture and imprisonment of most opposing political leaders in Nazi Germany. According to the book on Germany, “Denouncers and…

    • 379 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Rudolf Höss's Role In The Holocaust
    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Rudolf Höss's Role In The Holocaust

    Rudolf Höss was a Nazi leader who had an important role in the Holocaust. Höss was responsible for the deaths of many Jews and other Europeans. He thought of new ways to kill Jews quicker and more efficiently, and also made other improvements to Auschwitz. He was dedicated to his job and guaranteed the executions at Auschwitz would work with little error. Though Höss appeared to be a hard-working individual, some argue that he was a lapdog to other German leaders. No matter what, Höss accomplished his goals and did his job very well. Rudolf Höss murdered millions and played a crucial role as an executioner in the Holocaust.…

    • 1078 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Better Essays

    Joseph Goebbels The Power Of Rhetoric
    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Joseph Goebbels The Power Of Rhetoric

    In this systematic murder he forced Jewish people to work until near death at labor camps. When they became too weak for forced labor, they were forced to pay their own fare to be transported to a Nazi death camp. Only Jewish children under the age of four did not have to pay a fare to travel to their own death. All of the money gathered for these train fares to Auschwitz and other leading death camps, such as treblinka, would total up to $25 million dollars (Irishexaminer.com). The treatment inside these nazi horror camps was awful for the Jews. They were often fed little to nothing at forced labor camps and were fed nothing at all at death camps.…

    • 1573 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    The Theme of Inhumanity in 'Night' by Elie Wiesel
    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The Theme of Inhumanity in 'Night' by Elie Wiesel

    In the book Night, by Elie Wiesel, Hitler’s main goal was to make the Jews feel inhuman; he was very successful in this. The Jews were tortured everyday for no reason at all other than for the SS officers’ own amusement. The SS officers treated the men as if they were animals, making them fight for food. Women, babies, old, sick, and handicapped were put into the crematoriums as soon as they arrived at the camps. They killed people for no reason, with no remorse whatsoever. Torture, being treated like animals, and being burned alive or killed were all things that led to the Jews feeling as if they were not human.…

    • 692 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Was the Involvement of Ordianry Germans in the Holocaust
    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages

    What Was the Involvement of Ordianry Germans in the Holocaust

    Historians do not agree entirely on the involvement of the majority of ordinary Germans during the Holocaust. Daniel Goldhagen argues in his book “Hitler’s Willing Executioners”, that the majority of the German population had full knowledge of the Nazis plot against the Jewish people and were willing to participate. However, others such as Gellately disagree that the German public were purely Anti-Semitic, instead it is believed they were subjected to a clever propaganda machine. However, the question remains as to why they didn’t stand up en mass to the Nazi Regime. Hitler’s propaganda minister Joseph Goebbles used his best efforts to try and ‘Sugar Coat’ the Holocaust and cleverly justify the treatment Jews were being subject to, nevertheless, Germans soon found out what was being done to the Jews. Hefer, a German Truck Driver, witnessed the Jews being lined up and shot by Ukrainian supporters…

    • 1583 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Adolf Hitler's Influence
    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages

    Adolf Hitler's Influence

    In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler expressed his opinion of how Germany should be ruled. While in prison for a five year sentence, but he only ended up serving a few months, for a failed coup known as the Beer Hall Putsch, he wrote an autobiography that he named Mein Kampf as stated on page 478 of Important World Leaders by Guliano. In Vienna, he formed this notion that Aryans are the superior, master race while trying to pursue his dream of art, which he later failed at (“Adolf Hitler” Baird). In Mein Kampf, he explained that pure Aryan blood signified the dominant race, and the enemy was “Jewry, communism, effete liberalism and decadent capitalism.” This displays a renewed German nationalism under fighting and suggests they take back the land lost to other countries (“Adolf Hitler” Baird). This book served as the political platform for the Nazi party. This is significant because without this book, the Nazis may have never believed the Aryans were superior and should be the only race left in Germany. Adolf Hitler openly expressed and flaunted his anti-Semitism (“Adolf Hitler” Fredriksen). Without this book, the Nazis possibly may not have been convinced that the Jews were the enemy and the Aryans are above all, allowing for a mass killing of the Jews and other religions. Fredriksen stated that Hitler wanted to extend Germany’s borders, which might have been the cause for the start of…

    • 733 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Comparing Hitler And Henry David Thoreau
    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Comparing Hitler And Henry David Thoreau

    Henry David Thoreau once stated in Civil Disobedience “I was not born to be forced. Let us see who is the strongest. What force had multitude? Thoreau, the father of Transcendentalism, would have never predicted the events that would take place because of Hitler, nearly a century later, the way Hitler took what he wanted and did not care what people he affected. Both Hitler and Thoreau have one thing in common, they are willing to fight for what they believe, but how they differ is their methods. If Adolf Hitler and Henry Thoreau had worked together, Thoreau’s beliefs in Civil disobedience and individuality through simplicity would have transformed the way that Hitler used totalitarism methods during his reign as leader of Germany.…

    • 2625 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Why Did so Many Europeans Collaborate with the Nazi Occupiers?
    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages

    Why Did so Many Europeans Collaborate with the Nazi Occupiers?

    As the dust settled in Europe, collaborators were hung, sent running naked down the streets or imprisoned, while the resistance set out to define post-war Europe. The illusion of a clear distinction between Hitler’s henchmen and enemies shaped the psychology, language and power structures that are still present today. Collaboration and resistance, as categories of human behaviour, gained their historical relevance from the weight they carried after the war, rather than the limited part they played in bringing the conflict to an end. In reality, the decision to collaborate was, as choices always are, the individual’s response to his or hers perceived alternatives. It existed within every stratum, and along the entire scale of what is considered good and evil. It came in endless variations, and due to as many motivations. I will, however, argue that self-interest was the most important motivating factor. To avoid exaggerated emphasis on those in charge, I will return to the so called horizontal collaborators, who were often the first to be punished. Not only are their stories as personal as they can get, but their motivations can, with a tiny bit of imagination, be applied to every chunk of society. Also, in order to remain focused on the driving force behind collaboration, I will base my argument on the most crucial motivating factors: self preservation; the dissatisfaction with previous institutions; the common enemy; internal conflict; ideological similarities; and self-interest.…

    • 2547 Words
    • 11 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Adolf Hitler's Ordinary Men
    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages

    Adolf Hitler's Ordinary Men

    And in fact, many historians have been fairly comfortable to do so. But Christopher Browning’s account of the factors that encouraged regular Germans to take part in Hitler’s hideous plan reveals something of great importance where an event like the Holocaust is concerned. His Ordinary Men seeks to shift perspective away from the notion that those predisposed toward the behavior that perpetrated this greatest of human tragedies were inhuman and accustomed to operating in fashions more sociopathic than militarily appropriate. In doing so, he sets a sizable challenge for himself. Truly, there is no way to address why the German people participated in without elaborating upon some of the most unspeakable acts committed in modern history. To that end, Ordinary Men takes its readers through some difficult narratives that reveal brutal, amoral behaviors that would imply a society impoverished of intellectual, ethical or academic development to that point. Moreover, the base and vile nature of the war crimes committed against a people unprepared to defend themselves and presenting no legitimate antagonism to its aggressor, suggests that the German people themselves were inherently bad people, inclined toward acts of evil and…

    • 1712 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Comparison Of Horrible And Unthinkable Crimes During World War II
    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Comparison Of Horrible And Unthinkable Crimes During World War II

    Many horrible and unthinkable crimes were committed throughout World War II. During the war, members of the Nazi party, high-ranking officials, and everyday ordinary businessmen and lawyers were to blame for the death and annihilation of millions of people. They destroyed countries and civilians that did not meet their standards. People across the globe were not immune to the devastation that these criminals produced and throughout the years people would continue to feel the tragedy they left behind.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    Herman Goering Essay
    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages

    Herman Goering Essay

    Herman Goering made a significant contribution to 20th century history. He was a German politician, military leader, and a leading member of the Nazi Party who affected history many significant ways. From childhood, Goering displayed psychological symptoms that would influence his entire life. These symptoms included aggressive egotism, a vivid fantasy life that would blur the distinctions between reality and fantasy, a tendency to dominate the environment through showmanship and brute force, and an emotional insensitivity and perverted humour which allowed him to approve measures under the Nazis whose repercussions are felt today. Goering’s early desire to join the Nazi Party satisfied his aggressiveness, greed, status strivings, and militant nationalistic ego. From there his prodigious abilities together with his close friendship to Hitler allowed Goering to assume positions of power which culminated in activities such as his leadership of the Luftwaffe, the creation of the Gestapo, and a leading role in the invasion of Austria and later Poland which lead to the start of World War II. He was also actively involved in the holocaust. Gilbert and other sources support the view that Goering, because of his psychological makeup and desire for power was responsible for the above actions. During the Nuremberg trial it was stated that: ...Goering was the adviser, the active agent of Hitler, and one of the prime leaders of the Nazi movement… He developed the Gestapo and he first concentration camps... Roehm purge…threatened to bomb Prague… attack on Poland… use of slave labour…persecuted the Jews.”…

    • 2337 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More
  • Good Essays

    Why Did Hitler Hate Gypsies
    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Why Did Hitler Hate Gypsies

    Nazis are known for being hateful and murders of the Jewish people. They were evil and mistreating to the Jews. They even made “Nuremberg Laws” against the jews. “These laws, on which the rest of Nazi racial policy hung, were written hastily. In September 1935, Adolf Hitlerdecided that the time was ripe for more restrictions on Germany's Jews, especially since many Party militants had expressed their disappointment with the Arierparagraph.”…

    • 300 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
    Read More
  • Powerful Essays

    What Was Hitler’s Role in the Holocaust?
    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages

    What Was Hitler’s Role in the Holocaust?

    A central point, of this essay will be that Hitler’s role in the final solution was vital but this does not mean shifting the guilt of the Holocaust onto one individual. Nonetheless, Hitler’s criminal charismatic energy persistently instigated local and widespread anti- Semitism. He provided his Henchmen, as well as local counterparts within the regime with…

    • 1458 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
    Read More

Related Topics