Testing and Assesssment: Comprehensive review of the revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA)
Daniel Beaulieu
McGill University
The Revised BDI (1993)
Publication Dates: 1961-93
Authors: Aaron T. Beck and Robert A. Steer.
Acronym: BDI-IA
Price Data, 1994: $46 per complete kit including 25 record forms and manual ( '93, 24 pages); $25.50 per 25 record forms; 22.50 per manual
Introduction
The revised Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-IA), introduced at the Center for Cognitive Therapy (CCT) in 1971, is a 21 item self-report rating inventory which measures characteristic attitudes and symptoms for the purpose of assessing the severity of depression in adolescents and adults (BDI, 1993). The BDI "has become one of the most widely accepted instruments in clinical psychology and psychiatry for assessing the intensity of depression in psychiatric patients and for detecting possible depression in normal populations." (BDI, 1993, p. 1).
Theoretical Background
When Beck began studying depression in the 1950 's, the psychoanalytic theory prevailed, which viewed the syndrome as inverted hostility against the self. In contrast to this explanation, Beck (1967) observed that depressed patients could be more accurately described as having negative views of themselves, their present and future experiences. This lead Beck to propose his theory on negative cognitive triads (i.e.: negative thoughts are about the self, the world, and the future) as a framework for understanding the phenomenology of depression (Beck, 1967). The BDI clearly reflects this theory through a multitude of items represented in the test such as: "I feel that the future is hopeless and that things cannot improve" to reflect the future, "I feel I am a complete failure as a person" to reflect the self, and "I have lost all interest in other people" to reflect the world.
Secondly, the development of the BDI emerged to
References: Abela, J. R. Z., & D 'Allesandro, D. U. (2002). Beck 's cognitive theory of depression: The diathesis-stress and causal mediation components Ahava, G. W., Iannone, C., Grebstein, L., & Schirling, J. (1998). Is the Beck Depression Inventory reliable over time? An evaluation of multiple test-retest reliability in a nonclinical college student sample Beck, A.T., Steer, R.A., & Garbin, M. (1988). Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression Inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation Beck, A. T. (1967). Depression Causes and Treatment. Philadelphia, PA: university of Pennsylvania Press. Beck, A. T., & Beamesderfer, A. (1974). Assessment of depression: The Depression Inventory Beck, A. T., & Steer, R..A. (1993). BDI (Beck Depression Inventory): Manual for administration, scoring and interpretation. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Kovacs, M., & Garrison, B. (1985). Hopelessness and eventual suicide: A 10 year prospective study of patients hospitalized with suicidal Beck, A. T., Ward, C.H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression Beck, A. T., Weisman, A., Lester, D., & Trexlor, L. (1974). The measurement of pessimism: the Hopelessness Scale Bryson, S. E., Pilon, D. J. (1984). Sex differences in depression and the method of administering the Beck Depression Inventory Conoley, C. W., (1992). [Review of the Beck Depression Inventory, Revised Edition ]. In J Dahlstrom, W. G., Brooks, J. D., & Peterson, C. D. (1990). The Beck Depression Inventory: Item order and the impact of response sets Dozois, D. J. A., & Covin, R. (2004). The Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II), Beck Hopelessness Scale (BHS), and Beck Scale for Suicide Ideation (BSS) Gregory, R. J. (2007). Psychological Testing: History, principles, and applications. New York: Pearson. King, D.A., & Buchwald, A.M. (1982). Sex differences in subclinical depression: Administration of the Beck Depression Inventory in public and private disclosure Moran, P. W., & Lambert, M. J. (1983). A review of current assessment tools for monitoring changes in depression Santor, D. A., Ramsay, J. O., & Zuroff, D. C. (1994). Nonparametric item analyses of the Beck Depression Inventory: Evaluating gender item bias and response option weights