Preview

The Revised Ifrs 3 and Amended Ias 27

Satisfactory Essays
Open Document
Open Document
517 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Revised Ifrs 3 and Amended Ias 27
The revised IFRS 3 and amended IAS 27
Changes to the IFRSs

The main changes the revised IFRS 3 and amended IAS 27 will make to existing requirements or practice are:
• Partial acquisitions. Non-controlling interests are measured either as their proportionate interest in the net identifiable assets (which is the original IFRS 3 requirement) or at fair value (which is the new requirement in US GAAP).
• Step acquisitions: The requirement to measure at fair value every asset and liability at each step for the purposes of calculating a portion of goodwill has been removed. Instead, goodwill is measured as the difference at acquisition date between the fair value of any investment in the business held before the acquisition, the consideration transferred and the net assets acquired.
• Acquisition-related costs. Acquisition-related costs are generally recognised as expenses (rather than included in goodwill).
• Contingent consideration. Contingent consideration must be recognised and measured at fair value at the acquisition date. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognised in accordance with other IFRSs, usually in profit or loss (rather than by adjusting goodwill).
• Transactions with non-controlling interests . Changes in a parent’s ownership interest in a subsidiary that do not result in the loss of control are accounted for as equity transactions.
Changes to US GAAP

The changes made by the FASB to US GAAP are more fundamental than the changes we have made to IFRSs. Among the more significant of the changes it has made, all of which bring US GAAP into line with existing IFRSs, are:
• classifying non-controlling interests as equity.
• requiring restructuring charges to be accounted for as they are incurred, rather than allowing these to be anticipated at the time of the business combination.
• requiring in-process research and development (IPR&D) to be recognised as a separate intangible asset, rather than immediately written off as an

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    U.S. Gaap vs. Ifrs

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Another example of the different procedures between IFRS and GAAP is in the evaluation of intangibles. GAAP focuses mostly on recording them at a set price, and amortizing that value over the amount of useful life of the intangible. IFRS stresses constant re-evaluation of the price, and recognition at the intangible's fair value (Miska).…

    • 780 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There have been proposals that have been working on with regard to the replacement of GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles) with IFRS (International Financial Reporting Standards) as used in the accounting and financial reporting aspects. Such convergence requires that the functions of the GAAP standards be added to the IFRS. The International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) developed the IFRS which is a less-detailed financial reporting system.…

    • 1065 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Nt1310 Unit 10

    • 4489 Words
    • 18 Pages

    2. The company should report the asset at its historical cost of $420,000, not its current value. The main reasons for this position are (1) at the date of acquisition, cost reflects fair value; (2) historical cost involves actual, not hypothetical transactions, and as a result is extremely reliable; and (3) gains and losses should not be anticipated but should be recognized when the asset is sold.…

    • 4489 Words
    • 18 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Explanation: Both IFRS and GAAP have different requirements about the measurement and process for revaluating fixed assets to fair value.…

    • 1273 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    ACC 541 Week 1

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The FASB intends to analyze each of the differences within the scope and either (1) amend applicable U.S. GAAP literature to reduce or eliminate the difference or (2) communicate to the IASB the Board’s rationale for electing not to change U.S. GAAP. Concurrently, the IASB will review IFRS and make similar determinations of whether to amend applicable IFRS or communicate its rationale to the FASB for electing not to change the IASB’s GAAP (Schroeder, Clark, & Cathey, 2011). A couple of the issues the FASB and IFRS are currently working on include…

    • 1251 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    Indirect interest: An ownership interest in a company, which derives from owning equity in that…

    • 1775 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Fin361 Appendix 3a

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages

    The financial statement analyst should • consider the qualitative as well as the quantitative components of earnings for an accounting period • develop an earnings figure that reflects the future ongoing potential of the firm…

    • 2222 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    | U.S. GAAP tends to be more rule-based, and the IASB standards tend to be principles-based.…

    • 819 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Ifrs vs Gaap

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages

    be made. Many aspects of the GAAP and IFRS are very different. It is the intent of this paper to analyze differences between the two methods in revenue recognition, earnings per share, inventory, and intangible assets.…

    • 1357 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Gaap vs Ifrs

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages

    The purpose of this paper is to compare and contrast some of important differences between US GAAP and IFRS and, though this analysis, give a better understanding how these standards apply in the real world accounting field. This paper analyzes similarities and differences in revenue recognition, asset impairment, consolidation processes, contingencies, and depreciation. In revenue recognition, the definition and treatment of revenue recognition according to US GAAP and IFRS is different. GAAP recognizes revenue when all of the following criterions are made: persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery has occurred or services have been rendered, the seller’s price to the buyer is fixed or determinable, and collectability is reasonably assured. IFRS, on the other hand, has more general requirements and less specified guidance. In asset impairment, the primary difference between GAAP and IFRS is that US GAAP requires a two-step process while IFRS only requires a one step process to…

    • 6672 Words
    • 27 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    personality demension by

    • 759 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The correct answer is: have a choice of following GAAP for private companies or IFRS…

    • 759 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    *IFRS requires separate display of the portion of profit or loss attributable to the minor-…

    • 730 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Equity Method: Exercise

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages

    3. The required entries by the investor mirror what the investee is recording in earnings and stockholders equity…..for the % ownership by the investor.…

    • 754 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Week 2 Ex and Problems

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages

    | The excess of the cost of a company over the fair market value of the net assets acquired.…

    • 611 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    However, the change is not just a formal process- changing the name from “National GAAP” to “IFRS”. There are some serious differences between the two systems. The old system was mainly tax oriented. Some changes affect assets and liabilities valuation, income taxes, provisions, depreciation and amortization. The simplest examples would be the growth of significance of the fair value concept or the amount of the reported profits of the companies under Bulgarian GAAP or the IFRS. There are also differences in provision percentages and disclosures, depreciation methods, income taxes calculation procedures etcetera. Perhaps the ones of greatest importance are changes related to financial instruments. The overlapping National Accounting Standards (NAS) 25 and NAS 32, which lacked…

    • 1182 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays