Preview

The Right to Bear Arms

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
973 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Right to Bear Arms
The United States Constitution says that U.S. Citizens have the right to bear arms. It just all depends how they take action. According to a report by engineering statistician the general public is 5.7 times more likely to be arrested for violent offenses and 13.5 times more likely to be arrested for non-violent offenses, than concealed carry weapon permit holders. There are a lot of reason why some people want this law banned, but these arguments are outweighed only by the need of protection. The second Amendment guarantees the right to conceal handguns under the United States. In the 2008 case, District of Colombia v. Heller, the Supreme Court ruled that the inherent right of self-defense has been central to the Second Amendment right,” and that the second Amendment protects “the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation”. The Second Amendment states, "A well-regulated Militia being necessary to the security of a Free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed." According to a 1997study of National Crime Victimization Survey data, "robbery and assault victims who used a gun to resist were less likely to be attacked or to suffer an injury than those who used any other methods of self-protection or those who did not resist at all. Even if an adult never needs to draw a concealed handgun for self-defense, I may feel safer being armed and feel freer to go outside at night or in dangerous areas. The right to have concealed handguns is they support citizens in self-defense and deters crime. With gang population and gang-related violence growing at an exponential rate, it is imperative that law abiding citizens are given the right under the constitution to defend themselves. The National Crime Victimization Surveys concluded that “robbery and assault victims who used a gun to resist were less likely to be attacked or to suffer an injury than those who used any other methods of self-protection or those

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    young children and teachers lost their lives and the many other horrific shooting America has…

    • 711 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    This article details history of mass shootings that used assault weapons in America. The author places a definition on assault weapons as “a semiautomatic weapon with a detachable ammunition magazine and some type of advanced feature typically used in military-grade weapons.” The previous and now expired ban on certain assault weapons is also discussed in detail. The article suggests that proponents believe assault weapons are “guns of choice for mass shootings.” Opposing views on restrictions are also expressed in regards to mental health care as a solution to preventing tragedies.…

    • 389 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    The United States Constitution was created on September 17, 1787 as the supreme law of the land. This document outlines the ten amendments which guarantee certain rights that American citizens will always have. One of these freedoms and possibly the most important is the right to keep and bear arms. As written in the Constitution, “A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed” (U.S. Constitution). Whatever the purpose these guns are meant to serve it is clear that the right to own them cannot be impaired.…

    • 2498 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The constitutional right quoted above all else is the second amendment: the right to bear arms. Many have been harmed directly and indirectly through legal fire arms. The second amendment is put up to debate after numerous hate crimes and school shootings. What if stricter restrictions had been implemented concerning gun purchases, the guns might not have been…

    • 58 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1990, an article titled, "The Right to Bear Arms" was published in Parade Magazine. The article, written by former Chief Justice of the United States (1969-86), Warren E. Burger addressed issues on the second amendment. In this article, he examines the needs of society to have guns when the Bill of Rights was drafted versus modern day society, using logic and history to appeal to his audience. While not necessarily taking a standpoint against the second amendment's right given to bear arms, he criticizes the regulations on handguns, suggesting there should be more in place in order for levels of violence to decrease.…

    • 885 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is true that people have the right to bear arms because of the Second Amendment. The Second Amendment states that "A well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.” But, just because people have the right to bear arms doesn’t mean that every should have a concealed weapons. Criminals are 75% more likely to carry when committing a crime too because there is a greater chance of finding a civilian with a concealed weapon.…

    • 276 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The right to bear arms is the the Second Amendment in the United States constitution. What says a well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. The right to bear arms has been around this country long then it's been a country. Putting more restrictions on guns just goes against what our founding fathers intend the nation to be like and infringes against the right to bear arms.The second amendment supports my claim which is anti-gun control laws and how putting restrictions on gun makes it…

    • 739 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The provision of the English Bill of Rights that guaranteed the right to bear arms and required parliamentary consent to have a standing army was so important because it provided citizens with some form of defense, support, and protection. The right to bear arms was important because it allowed every citizen to protect themselves against harm legally, as opposed to only having a select few citizens that were guaranteed this right like it was before this provision. It was also important for consent from parliament in order to have a standing army because it would provide protection whenever a standing army was in place, but would still allow limitations on when the country would have one. This could ultimately help the country save money by…

    • 151 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    As Americans we have civil liberties. Civil liberties are basic rights and freedoms that are guaranteed to American citizens (Thompson). For example, as Americans one of our civil liberties is to keep and bear arms. In our society, this civil liberty has become an issue due to several incidents involving firearms. Therefore, a bill has been constructed threatening our right to bear arms. I feel that as Americans we have many reasons that we should have this civil liberty is because the right to bear arms involved in the second and fourth amendments. The second amendment clearly states “a well-regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right if the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed. If our government can take away our rights like it’s nothing, then what else can they take from us? We have many rights as Americans. The right to bear arms is one of the biggest. Some of the reasons why we shouldn’t have guns banned are second and fourth amendments, hunting, they will not end deaths, and how there are many other reasons of death that we should be worried about. Although these are just among the few that I have mentioned there are plenty more reasons why Americans should be able to have guns in our nation.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Guns are used 2.5 million times a year in self defense. Armed citizens kill more criminals than police do. They shoot and kill twice as many in a year then they do. Which is something cool to know about concealed carry. Although, the second amendment of the US constitution allows citizens to bear arms, adults should have the right to concealed carry, because criminals are less likely to attack someone that might have a gun, criminals carry concealed carry regardless of legality,and carrying a concealed weapon could help stop all of the shooting sprees.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Right To Bear Arms

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Gun control and the Second Amendment have been in the new and at the forefront of American conversation in the last several months. The largest topic in this discussion is, what does the Second Amendment say, what does it mean, and does it still apply today. The main viewpoints of this argument really come from each group’s interpretation of the verbiage that makes up the Second Amendment. One group takes a universal human right to bear arms approach, while another group takes an approach that makes the Second Amendment a propositional statement.…

    • 456 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Because of the establishment of concealed carry legislation by all states over the years, it has been increasingly possible for almost every American citizen to carry concealed weapons in public places. As unfortunate and horrifying gun violence tragedies like the Newtown School Shooting and Sandy Hook school shooting repeatedly occur, whether citizens should have the right to carry a conceal handgun in public has created a massive uproar. People have different views about this issue. Just as the Second Amendment states that every human being has the constitutional right to keep and bear arms, many gun-rights advocates believe that reasonable citizens have the right to…

    • 1750 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Shootings, massacres and suicides. The united States of America has extrememly high rates of each compared to every other country in the world. Why, you may ask? It's all down to the second amendment to its constiution - the right to bear arms. Firearm regulations and laws are subtly varied in each country and though most governments are iron-fisted when it comes to guns. Nevertheless, North America is exceedingly leiniet and the majority of its population is entitled to legal firearm ownership.…

    • 675 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    School campus’ have always been a large target for shooters and attackers. Students and teachers that have spent time to gain the trust of the government to conceal carry should also be able to holster on a campus without interruption. Many people will say having any weapons is a danger to students and any other pedestrians on campus but a law abiding citizen that has had training and known when a weapon should and shouldn't be used could be vital to saving the lives of many during a life or death situation. Shooters also knowing that this is true are a lot less likely to try and target a school knowing there is going to be resistance. Currently there are only twelve states (Idaho, Utah, Colorado, Mississippi, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Wisconsin,…

    • 794 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Second Amendment

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Heller (“District of Colombia V. Heller”, Oyez) had major influence over the right to bear arms and the interpretation of the Second Amendment. Therefore the focus of this case was whether or not the District of Colombia’s gun laws violated the citizen’s right to bear arms and the Second Amendment. The District of Colombia’s laws in question banned handguns and required all legal firearms to be disassembled or locked, preventing them from being used for self-defense. But before the judges made their decisions they had to look at the Second Amendment and determine the meaning of it, and if the right to bear arms applied to the citizen’s. Therefore Heller and his attorneys claimed that the citizens were given the right to bear arms by the Second Amendment; they used the fact that the laws prevented citizen from protecting themselves with firearms which they claimed was protected by the Second Amendment. While The District of Colombia and its representatives and the federal trial court in Washington D.C. used the wording of the Second Amendment as evidence that the right to bear arms only applied to militias, such as the army, National Guard and law enforcement. But when the case got to the U.S Supreme Court, the judges ruled with a five to four decision that the Second Amendment is made to protect every individual’s right to bear arms not just the militias, because of this ruling it forever changed the interpretation of the…

    • 1221 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays