Cold War in Latin America. On the other hand, it is argued by Hal Brands the 1959 revolution was the breaking point of US relations with Cuba as we feared having a socialist nation this close to our country. The proceeding years lacked diplomatic relations and cooperation, this led to a major falling out between the two countries. Another historian, Daniela Spenser, makes a point that the US was not the only country whose relationship with Cuba had changed in this period. Although it originally was the Soviets who backed up Cuba and installed the missiles on the island to ward off and US invasion, it was also the Soviets who eventually found the Cuban leadership to be unfit to wield such weapons and after debates with the US, the missiles were removed. Cuba was betrayed by those closest to them and Castro let his frustrations be heard in many letters to the Kremlin. In the fallout of the Missile Crisis, the Soviets wished to maintain a strong influence on Cuba and in Latin America. While this was the plan it ended up being the opposite. Cuba knew that the Soviets needed good relations with them and they used this knowledge to used the Soviet power in new guerilla revolts across Latin America. Not only did Cuba not become a Soviet puppet, they took control of the USSR because of their ideological position. While Spenser’s statements do not neatly fall into the same categories as Brands and Rabe, her argument and information gives a unique insight in the the vulnerability in the Soviet government and how Cuba took advantage of this to globally push their revolution.
Cold War in Latin America. On the other hand, it is argued by Hal Brands the 1959 revolution was the breaking point of US relations with Cuba as we feared having a socialist nation this close to our country. The proceeding years lacked diplomatic relations and cooperation, this led to a major falling out between the two countries. Another historian, Daniela Spenser, makes a point that the US was not the only country whose relationship with Cuba had changed in this period. Although it originally was the Soviets who backed up Cuba and installed the missiles on the island to ward off and US invasion, it was also the Soviets who eventually found the Cuban leadership to be unfit to wield such weapons and after debates with the US, the missiles were removed. Cuba was betrayed by those closest to them and Castro let his frustrations be heard in many letters to the Kremlin. In the fallout of the Missile Crisis, the Soviets wished to maintain a strong influence on Cuba and in Latin America. While this was the plan it ended up being the opposite. Cuba knew that the Soviets needed good relations with them and they used this knowledge to used the Soviet power in new guerilla revolts across Latin America. Not only did Cuba not become a Soviet puppet, they took control of the USSR because of their ideological position. While Spenser’s statements do not neatly fall into the same categories as Brands and Rabe, her argument and information gives a unique insight in the the vulnerability in the Soviet government and how Cuba took advantage of this to globally push their revolution.