Preview

The Role Of Filibuster In Politics

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
597 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Filibuster In Politics
In the world of politics, a politician’s actions are not taken very lightly. For example, politicians would have to be cautious of how they communicate to the community. They also have to be aware of the way they convey their expressions through oral speeches and through the written language. In the Senate, senators communicate through speeches and debates. When senators speak or debate, there will be some senators that would occasionally agree and disagree with other senators. When one who does not accept the idea of another, may begin what is called a filibuster. The term filibuster, only applies to the Senate. A filibuster does not apply to the House of Representative for the fact of the growing numbers of members within that house that will vary from time to time. The House of Representative also have different rules from the Senate regarding the time a debate can prolong (United States Senate). When a filibuster takes …show more content…
An example of this would be Huey Long, Senator of Louisiana. “His motive was to prevent his political enemies in Louisiana from obtaining lucrative NRA jobs” (Filibuster History 6). NRA is the acronym for the word National Recovery Administration's. During Long’s speech, he read the constitution and even read recipes (Filibuster History 6). Unfortunately for Long, his efforts were not recognized, his speech lasted for fifteen hours and thirty minutes (Filibuster History 6). In today’s term for filibuster in the Senate, it would be used to by the minorities against the majority and the majority against the minorities. To explain this, the minorities would use the filibuster method to veto any bill propose by majorities and the same for majorities towards the minorities. It is not to be taken lightly in the world of politics with politicians who are willing to take time out of their lives to fight for what they

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Powerful Essays

    The founding fathers were afraid of any entity in the new government becoming too much like the monarchs they had fled from. For that reason there are limitations built into the United States Constitution that give each branch of government some control over the other branches. The United States system of government is based on a set of checks and balances that keep one branch or one person from becoming too powerful. It divides the powers of the federal government between the Congress, the President and the Federal Courts. One of the powers of the President is to exercise the veto over bills passed by Congress. This…

    • 2303 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Despite the majority rule that occurs thanks to loyal party leaders, a Senate minority is not completely powerless to obstruct the majority agenda. The Senate’s long-cherished rule of unlimited debate, also known as the filibuster, allows Senators in the partisan minority to hold the floor indefinitely, until a motion for cloture is successful invoked. Because these cloture motions require 60 votes, the majority must often propose policies that will avoid a serious…

    • 1203 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The Fathers of Confederation conceived of the Senate as a “chamber of sober second thought.” However, almost ever since its creation, as the unelected arm of the legislature, people have suggested ways in which to reform the upper house. Concerns of illegitimate representation, party loyalty, and patronage are the main reasons the argument for change continues. This paper aims to review a couple of recent reform proposals, and then argue, leaving constitutional practicality behind, that the Senate should receive a major overhaul in how it is formed and represented.…

    • 558 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Equality in Filibusters

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages

    A filibuster is used when a senator believes that his or her stance on a bill is better than that of the majority of the other senators. Senators usually do a filibuster when they know that if that bill goes to be…

    • 980 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Best Essays

    Senate Filibuster Tradition

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages

    There is a long-standing tradition that sets the U.S. Senate apart from all other government institutions, the filibuster. The term “filibuster,” from Dutch origins, became popular in the 1850’s when it became attributed to efforts by Senators to hold the Senate floor in order to prevent the vote on a bill (U.S. Senate). Since then, unlimited debate has continued to characterize the Senate and allow any senator the right to speak endlessly. As of recent, talk of changing the Senate filibuster rule has gotten a lot of attention. This change, proposed by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid tries to weaken the power of the filibuster by reducing the threshold for the amount of votes necessary to…

    • 3419 Words
    • 14 Pages
    Best Essays
  • Better Essays

    Senate Filibuster Tactics

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages

    The filibuster is a tactic that is needed in the Senate and actually helps the Senators in the long run. “For example, the filibuster is an essential element in moderating the extremes of our competitive party system” (pg. 171). The filibuster is viewed as crucial to the Senate, because it makes the competitive party system we have become less extreme. A senator being able to delay his or her vote, it gives them more time to think about who they want to vote on because of the fact there are so many individuals who apply for the exact same position. Senators do not just want to give their votes to any random person, they want to make it count. It has even been said the filibuster process helps smooth out “worst abuses of this special interest participation” (pg. 171). Meaning this process does not allow the “Majority Rule” to be used in order to make a decision. Although there is a certain amount needed in order to filibuster something, it gives them the opportunity to be heard if they do not agree with what is brought to the…

    • 1821 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    It is a fact that the Senate and the House of Representatives are two completely different houses. It is also proven that both houses are needed to work together to benefit America and its…

    • 303 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The term I chose was gridlocking. Gridlocking is when Congress has trouble passing bills due to an evenly split vote in Congress. This happens very frequently and that is why it is hard to pass a bill. The article I chose was very interesting. It talked about how a bill actually gets gridlocked and how it affects not only Congress, but American citizens too. A famous example of gridlocking is when President Clinton got impeached. Gridlocking relates to "How Congress Works" because people of Congress as the "do nothing congress", but in reality a bill is most likely gridlocked. Sometimes the house may agree on the bill and then the senate may totally disagree. The article says that in 2013 only 23 bills got passed to become laws. This was the…

    • 156 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Better Essays

    Abolishing The Filibuster

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages

    The modern American government has been shaped by decades of discourse, debate, and compromise. From the founding fathers to the modern tea party movement, American politics have always involved debate between opposing sides and point of views. As a result of the age of our government and the extreme desire with which one side is willing to argue their point of view, outdated and frivolous means of debating and stalling have become prevalent within the modern American government. The most severe and prominent use of stalling within the modern American Government, is the filibuster. The filibuster is a stalling tactic used by a party or political group in order to stop a bill that they disagree with. Once, the filibuster was reserved and used in the most extreme and rarest of cases, but with the evolution of the modern government, the filibuster has become used significantly more. The use of the filibuster has become outdated and ineffective, because of the significant changes within the modern American government; therefore, it should be abolished.…

    • 883 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    I am in favor of congressional limits because I think times have changed. It is a touchy subject because it is considered unconstitutional but I still believe it should be pushed. If term limits are implemented more women and minorities would be included into the congress seats. There are currently no term limits for Senators or House members, but it has been discussed for years. If term limits were to be implemented, most members of Congress would disqualify about half of those who are currently serving. President Trump has pledged to implement term limits since winning the election. He proposed to set a three-term (six-year) cap for House members and two-term (12-year) cap for senators, according to my source Time.com. I agree with the terms…

    • 154 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Whether there should be term limits in congress is a very heated debate in today's society. Career politicians were not a threat to the system of Congress that the founding fathers created. They were still trying to create a system that worked for everyone. Except in today's society, that is a little different story. Some politicians try to stay in office as long as possible, not to help the public but to benefit themselves. Now let me establish some common ground.…

    • 903 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Donald Trump Rhetoric

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages

    Famous philosopher and poet, Aristotle, once described, “[rhetoric] may be defined as the faculty of observing in any given case the available means of persuasion. This is not a function of any other art.” Thus, rhetoric is a form of clear, perceptible language which leads its observers to make a specific and calculated conclusion. Many consider politicians to be the most avid users of rhetoric, constantly trying to convince audiences to vote or certain way or to shift the national political agenda in a direction that fits their means. In many cases, politicians are accused of being liars or untruthful for doing so. Contrary, others consider politicians to be masters of languages, constantly formulating methods to make their arguments more…

    • 1382 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Politics plays a huge role in everyone’s lives and is always a topic of discussion in today’s society. Peoples political views differ from one side of the spectrum to the other and there is really no right or wrong view, it is all personal opinion. Even the term politics has multiple definitions out there that are accepted by some and rejected by others. Dyck defines politics as “The activity in which conflicting interests struggle for advantage or dominance in the making and execution of public policies.” (Dyck, Rand, 2012). Some people believe this is a proper definition of politics while others disagree and believe other definitions are more appropriate. This paper will illustrate examples that support Dyck’s definition and how it can be…

    • 1793 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    During a political campaign, the candidate must modulate their words very carefully, so much so that sometimes it seems that he or she becomes an entirely different person. In order to attract new supporters, and to not alienate those who already have given their support, the candidate's statements must always be carefully constructed. Typically, each candidate chooses issues that they feel they can…

    • 2174 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    The following three authors have written essays describing the power of political language. They explain…

    • 920 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays