IN the 1980’s the subway system in New York had fallen into shambles. Rather than fix it, the city and the MTA (Metropolitan Transit Association) let it lie, and graffiti artists took matters into their own hands, “Graffiti called attention to a mass transit system that had fallen into utter disrepair and which the city had no possible means to fix. Many of the more skilled writers saw their creative efforts as attempts to beautify a neglected, ramshackle transit system that had been subject to years of disinvestment and deferred maintenance” (Dickinson 30). Graffiti attempted to showcase the grave condition of the subway system, a system that most people in New York depend on. Individuals from lower income areas especially relied on the subway for means of transportation. It was thought that through graffiti these issues could be showcased and fixed, but that was not the …show more content…
The MTA funded countless programs to discourage artists, including “restrict access to the train yards through fencing, razor wire and attack dogs meant that the risks involved in getting to the trains increased substantially” (Dickinson 35). The MTA used brutality and force to stop graffiti on trains, and criminalized young adults as they attempted to end the graffiti. Through intimidation graffiti eventually stopped appearing on New York train in 1988, however, “The process was a long, expensive and contentious one, made possible by prevailing notions about criminality and young people of color, and the unwavering determination and support of the business community” (Dickinson 36). Through costly programs that encouraged criminalization of young people of color and intimidation, New York city was eventually able end graffiti on city transit