Preview

The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
12031 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.
Title

The Role of Physical Attraction and Social Factors in Human Relationships.

Gail Drew (2003)

Department of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield HD1 3DH.

Abstract

Objectives

The present study was partly based on previous research (Singh, 1993; 1994; Fallon and Rozin, 1985; Goodwin, 1990; Smith et al, 1990) to investigate the role of female body physical attractiveness and social factors between males and females in human relationships. The evolutionary theory and the social learning theory provide the basis of investigation. Four hypotheses were investigated, regarding female body shapes concerning their attractiveness. Three hypotheses were investigated in relation to personality factors, physical attributes and financial resources.
Design
The present study used a self-report questionnaire design. There were three independent variables. The first independent variable consisted of female body shapes in the form of line drawings with four levels varying from (very slim to heavy). The second variable consisted of line drawings varying in female body shapes (underweight to overweight) with twelve levels in the waist-to-hip ratio (WHR) varying from 0.7 WHR (underweight) to 0.10 WHR (overweight). The third independent variable consisted of eighteen social factors. A repeated measures design was employed for all conditions. A number of one-factor repeated measures ANOVA’s and a number of independent t-tests were employed for the results analysis.
Method
57 couples took part in the present study (57 males and 57 females). The length of relationships ranged from 2 weeks to 26 years. The sex and length of relationship was recorded. The participant’s age, background, profession, and religion were not recorded. Participants were gathered using a stratified sample. Their tasks were to rate female body



References: ψ Archer, J (1996) Sex differences in Social behaviour: Are the Social role theory and evolutionary explanations compatible? American Psychologist, 51, pp. 909-917. ψ Barber, N. (1998) Secular changes in standards of bodily attractiveness in American women: Different masculine and feminine ideals. The Journal of Psychology, 132, pp 87-94. ψ Baron, R. A., and Byrne (2000) Social Psychology (9th ed). Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M (1994) The evolution of desire strategies of human mating. New York. ψ Buss, D, M (1999) Evolutionary Psychology: The new science of the mind. Nova York. Allyn and Bacon. ψ Buss, D, M and Barnes, M., F (1986) Preferences in human mate selection. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, pp. 559-570. ψ Buss, D, M., & Schmitt. D. M (1993) sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating, Psychology review, 100, pp. 204-232. ψ Chodorow, N. (1978) The reproduction of mothering. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. ψ Cohn, L D. & Adler, N, E. (1992) Female and Male perceptions of ideal body shapes. Psychology of Women’s Quartley, 16, pp. 69-79. ψ Cunningham, M. R., Barbee, A. P., & Pike, C. L. (1990) What do women what? Facial metric assessment of multiple motives in the perception of male physical activeness. Journal of personality and social psychology, 59, pp 61-72. ψ Coolican, H. (1999) (3rd Eds) Research methods and statistics in psychology. London. Hodder and Stoughton. ψ Dawin, C (1871) The descent of man and selection in relation to sex. London. Murray. ψ Demarest, J., & Allen, R. (2000) Body image: Gender, ethnic, and age differences. Journal of Social Psychology, 140, pp 465-472. ψ Fallon and Rozin (1985) Sex differences in perception of desirable body shape. Journal of abnormal Psychology, 94, pp 102-105. ψ Eagly, A. (1987) Sex differences in Social behaviour: A Social role interpretation. Hillsdale, HJ: Erlbaum. ψ Feingold, A. (1990) Gender differences in effects of physical on romantic attraction, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, pp 981-993. ψ Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997) Waist to hip ratio and preferences for the body shape: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 22, pp 539-549. ψ Fouts, G., & Burggraf, K (1999) Television situation comedies: Female body images and verbal reinforcements. Sex roles, 40, pp. 473-481. ψ Goodwin, R. (1990) Sex differences among partner preferences: Are the sexes really very similar? Sex Roles, 23, pp. 501-513. ψ Graziano, W. G (1993) Social influences, sex differences, and judgements of beauty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 522-531. ψ Grogan, S (1998) Body Image, understanding body dissatisfaction in men. Women and children. London. Routledge. ψ Hamida, S. B., Mineka, S., & Bailey, J. M (1998) Sex differences in perceived controllability of mate value: an evolutionary perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, pp. 953-966. ψ Henss, R. (1995) Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness. Replication and extension. Personality and individual differences, 19, pp 479-488. ψ Henss, R. (2000) Waist-to-hip ratio and female attractiveness. Evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality and Individual Differences, 28, pp. 501-513. ψ Herz, R. S., & Inzlicht, M (2000) Sex differences in response to physical and social factors involved in human mate selection. The importance of smell for women. Evolution and Human behaviour, 23, pp. 359-364. ψ Hyde, J. S. (1990) Meta-analysis and the psychology of gender differences. Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 16, pp. 55-73. ψ Kenrick, D. T., and Trost, M. R (1993) The evolutionary perspective. Cited in Beall A. E., and Sternberg. R.J (eds), The psychology of gender (pp. 148-172). New York & London: Guilford Press. ψ Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Marlowe, F., & Wetsman, A. (2001) Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Personality and individual differences, 30, pp 481-489. ψ Muth, J.L., Cash, T.F. (1997). Body image attitudes: what difference does gender make? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 27, pp 1438-1452. ψ Pfeiffer, E., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Determinants of sexual behaviour in middle and old age. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Davis, G. C., (1972) Sexual Behaviour in Middle Life. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Pfeiffer, E., Verwoerdt, A., and Wang, H. S (1968) Sexual Behaviour in Aged men and Women. Cited in Margolin, L and White, L (1987) The Continuing Role of Physical Attractiveness in Marriage. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 49, pp. 21-27. ψ Robson, C. (1991) Real world research. Oxford: Blackwell. ψ Rubin, L. B (1983). Intimate strangers: Men and women together. New York: Harper and Row. ψ Silberstein, L. R., Striegel-Moore, R. H., Timko, C. & Rodin, J. (1988). Behavioural and psychological implications of body dissatisfaction: Do men and women differ? Sex Roles, 19, pp. 219-232. ψ Singh, D. (1993) Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, pp 293-307. ψ Singh, D. (1994) Ideal female body shapes: Role of weight and waist-to-hip ratio. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 16, pp 285-288. ψ Singh, D., & Young, R. K (1995) Body weight, waist-to-hip ratio, breast and hips: role in judgements of female attractiveness and desirability. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, pp. 483-507. ψ Smith, J. B., Waldolf. V., & Trembath. D. L. (1990). “Single white male looking for thin, very attractive female…” Sex roles, 23, pp. 675-685. ψ Spence, J., Deaux, K., and Helmreich, R. L. (1985) Sex roles in contemporary American Society. Cited in Lindsay, G and Aronson E. (Eds), Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol.2) (pp. 149-178). New York. Random House. ψ Stice, E., Schupak-Neuberg, E., Shaw. H. E., & Stein, R. L (1994) Relation of Media exposure to eating disorder symptomatology: An examination of mediating mechanisms. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 103 (3), pp. 836-840. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1990) Effects of potential partners’ costume and physical attractiveness on sexuality and partner selection. Journal of Psychology, 124, pp 371-389. ψ Townsend, J.M. (1993) Sexuality and partner selection: Sex differences among college students. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, pp. 305 - 330. ψ Travis, C. (1992) The mismeasure of women. New York: Simon and Schuster. ψ Yu, D. W., & Shepard, G. H. Jr (1998). Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Nature, 396, pp 321-322.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Satisfactory Essays

    14. What is generally the most important factor in the evolution of mating systems and why does this “make sense’?…

    • 1524 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Even though Jones discusses the potential extent to which culture influences the standards of female attractiveness, it seems however that he profusely supports the theory that the universal criterion of female attractiveness and fecundity such as waist-to-hip ratio are…

    • 1561 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Like other similar research, this study will determine that it is the similarities not the differences that bring people together when they are selecting their mates. This study explores this concept based strictly on physical attractiveness levels. Participants will be asked to rate each member of a couple separately and then the rating will be compared. If the expected result is achieved, each individual will have a rating similar to that of their mate. It was concluded that people select mates that have a similar physical attractiveness level to their own.…

    • 1506 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    3. Parker, G. A. 1983. Mate Quality and Mating Decisions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.…

    • 1508 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    AO2/AO3 (P) There is supporting empirical evidence by Singh (1993) into the relationship between human sexual selection and reproductive success.(E) Singh found that although breast size, weight and physique varied over the years of beauty winners, a consistent feature was a small waist set against full hips. This suggests that the waist to hip ratio may symbolise fertility as this is a quality men find attractive and look for in women when choosing their partner.(C) This supports the theory of that there is a relationship between human sexual selection and reproductive success as it supports the intra-sexual selection explanation of that men look for certain traits in order to ensure reproductive success. By supporting the theory, this increased its internal validity.…

    • 823 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    gender/personality study)." Journal of Evolutionary Psychology, vol. 27, no. 3-4, 2005, p. 59+. Literature Resource Center, go.galegroup.com/ps/i.do?p=GLS&sw=w&u=birm64734&v=2.1&it=r&id=GALE%7CA147792453&asid=aadd9871a2c7e5eaf2f11b86b37428d9. Accessed 20 Mar. 2017.…

    • 1123 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Exposure to the “ideal” body images has been found to lower women's satisfaction with their own attractiveness. (1)…

    • 729 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are several human behavior characteristics that should be evaluated when studying the behavior of organizations. In studying how human behavior effects the organization as a whole, a look at the status characteristics theory is warranted. This theory states that there are differences in status characteristics that create status hierarchies within groups (Robbins & Judge, 2009). The term “status” refers to a position or rank in relation to others (Merriam-Webster, 2010). In simpler terms, people assign a status to individuals within groups based on differing reasons. The status that is assigned to an individual can have both positive and negative effects. This theory is important to understand because it is inherent in human behavior and may have wide spreading effects on organizational goals and commitments.…

    • 796 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The second major difference that men and women encounter in terms of body image is ways to enhance physical body parts to look like Hollywood actors or models. For instance men are less challenged to perform surgical procedures to change they body appearance, whereas women are normally willing to bear pain to reach them. The author contends, “the size of pants I wear seems to say something about my sexual appeal and sexual preference.” (Shanker 54). Further more women spend more time and money on average, shopping for body hugging clothing and face and…

    • 798 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Evolutionary psychologists explain male-female differences in courtship and sexuality by stating that “the sexes have evolved to differ profoundly in aggressiveness, dominance, and sexual strategies.” Wade and Travis. (2008). Psychology, Ninth Edition. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Prentice Hall Publishing. Evolutionary psychologists have brought forth the idea that males and females need to perform in a way that will allow them to pass on their genes.…

    • 528 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    *Critically evaluate Evolutionary Psychology theory as an explanation for sex differences in sexual j*ealousy. Discuss evidence for and against this explanation The subsequent part of this essay will now focus on the evidence against the theory of Evolutionary Psychology and will look at arguments in contradiction of this. The topic this essay will focus on in the argument against Darwin’s evolutionary psychology theory as an explanation for sex differences within sexual jealousy is Social Psychology. “The social structural theory states that the critical cause of sex differences is social structure. Because men and women tend to have different social roles, they become psychologically different to adjust to their social roles” (Eagly & Wood,…

    • 305 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Mate Preferences

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages

    The sex differences in human mate preferences were studied by Buss (1989), who developed a questionnaire which consisted of the two sections. First section included biographical data (age,…

    • 1224 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Breast implants seem to be a quick easy fix for someone who may think that they are not meeting up to the ideal body image of today. With all of the different things influencing women, especially the media, how would they ever be able to view their body as sufficient or even adequate without any alteration? Would it be possible for breast implants to really solve the issue of having a negative body image? After a woman gets breast implants, where would the unnatural enhancing stop? Women become obsessed with dissatisfaction of their bodies and want to continue with altering their entire figure.…

    • 1522 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Attractiveness was significantly and positively correlated with both the interviewer evaluation as well as the final…

    • 3141 Words
    • 13 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    In the journal article Sexual Strategies Theory: An Evolution Perspective on Human Mating by David Buss and David Schmitt readers are given a summary of essential points in regard to the Sexual Strategies Theory. This theory was created to rectify the errors that were made by other psychologist by introducing a core premise, showing how human mating is strategic. This logic led to the statement that “Humans seek particular mates to solve specific adaptive problems that their ancestors confronted during the course of human evolution; humans’ mate preferences and mating decisions are hypothesized to be strategic products of selection pressures operating during ancestral conditions(Buss & Schmitt, 1993).” This theory is directly dependent on the effects of…

    • 2105 Words
    • 9 Pages
    Powerful Essays