Preview

The Role Of Ww1 In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
3824 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Role Of Ww1 In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty
Topic 1- Decline and fall of the Romanov dynasty
Syllabus outline
Nicholas II as autocrat
Political, social and economic grievances in early 20th century Russia
The tsar’s failure to address the problems of Russia
The role of WWI in the fall of the tsarist regime
Focus questions
How stable was the social basis of tsarist rule?
Why was the government unable to meet the challenges emerging in the first decade and a half century?
How important were the Bolsheviks before 1917?
What effect did WWI have on the tsarist government?
The paradox
The last years of imperial Russia were characterized by a paradox. Externally, Russia appeared very strong. There had been substantial growth economically and her military force was large. But internally,
…show more content…
Orthodoxy→ church supported the divine right of the tsar and exhorted believers to obey the tsar as an agent of god
Social structure of Russia 1900
Nobility- 1%, owned 35$ of all land. Some had important jobs in government or in the army but were often there more on their position on society
Middle class- 0.5%, though small in number, there was a growing class of merchants, bankers and industrialists as industry and commerce developed. The professional class (doctors, teachers, lawyers) was growing and beginning to play a significant role in local government, lawyers particularly in politics
Urban workers- 10.7%, most young males. Literacy among them was 57.8%, twice national average. Were particularly receptive to revolutionary ideas. Low wages and poor working conditions
Peasants- 77%, poor, illiterate and uneducated. Widespread epidemics of typhus and diphtheria. Many lived in debt and squalor. Most got by in good farming years but in years with poor harvest, widespread starvation e.g. 1891, 400 000 died.
Industrialisation
Russia embarked on industrial development in order to strengthen its defences
It was begun in 1861 but was accelerated by the efforts of Sergei Witte
Main impetus was from government policy. It had 4 main
…show more content…
Petersburg begins the 1905 Russian Revolution
October 17 (October 30 NS) - The October Manifesto, issued by Tzar Nicholas II, brings an end to the 1905 Russian Revolution by promising civil liberties and an elected parliament (Duma)
1906
April 23 (May 6 NS) - A constitution (the Fundamental Laws of 1906) is created, reflecting the promises made in the October Manifesto
1914
July 15 (July 28 NS) - World War I begins
1915
September 5 (September 18 NS) - Tzar Nicholas II assumes supreme command of the Russian Army
1916
December 17 (December 30) - Rasputin is murdered
1917
February 23-27 (March 8-12 NS) - The February Revolution begins with strikes, demonstrations, and mutinies in Petrograd (also called the March Revolution if following the Gregorian

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    War broke out in 1914, with Tsar Nicholas becoming commander-in-chief in 1915, meaning he was away from Petrograd. Not only was this poorly thought out by Nicholas because it gave the people an opportunity to plot against him, but as he was away he left Tsarina (also a German princess), Alexandra, in charge during his absence. Due to the war being against Germany, this made the Russian people nervous and skeptical towards the extreme power she had over them during such a crucial time. Not only were they disgruntled by this, but also Alexandra’s close friendship to Rasputin, a Serbian peasant. This particularly angered the aristocracy and middle classes as they believed they were being led by someone of lower demeanor than that of themselves. This weakened support for the autocratic rule and lost the Tsar many of his supporters, which put him in a vulnerable position in the case of revolutionary upturn. This also could have inspired the peasantry to discover greater aspirations and encourage their belief that they could have greater status which in turn could trigger new revolutionary ideas amongst the lower classes. This demonstrates a link between Nicholas being away in order to commandeer army movement for the war, however it is arguable that it was a lack of authority and respect for the Tsarist regime that caused the change of opinions towards the Tsar amongst all classes, lessening his support and leaving him far more vulnerable in the case of a revolution.…

    • 1166 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    ‘Nicholas said over and over again: 'As God wills.' It wasn't as God wills. He had made mistakes and he was leading Russia in the wrong direction…’ - Robert K. Massie…

    • 1325 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    First, a reflection, the Russian Revolution began in March, 1917, the Bolsheviks, the leaders of Russia at the time,…

    • 1222 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Nicholas II being the last tsar of the Romanov dynasty that lasted for over 300 years, is accountable for the fall of the Romanovs in 1917, however, there are various other reasons too that involved in the ultimate fall of tsarism in Russia in February 1917. While Nicholas’s indecisiveness played a major role in portraying his negligence, the other factors that involved the fall of tsarism were, the declining economic standards and the growth of political opposition along with Nicholas II’s penultimate absence when he was most needed in his country, due to the involvement in the first world war, which was another mistake made by the tsar.…

    • 313 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Summary: Romanov Dynasty

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages

    “The daily work of a monarch he found intolerably boring”-Kerensky. In a tsarist autocracy, all power and wealth is controlled and distributed by the tsar. The center of the tsarist autocracy was the person of the tsar himself, a sovereign with absolute authority. The rights of state power in their entire extent belonged to the tsar. Power was further entrusted by him to persons and institutions, acting in his name, by his orders, and within the limits laid down for them by law. The purpose of the system was to supposedly benefit the entire country of Russia. “Autocracy is a superannuated form of government that may suit the needs of a Central African tribe, but not those of the Russian people, who are increasingly assimilating the culture of the rest of the world. That is why it is impossible to maintain this form of government except by violence.” -Nicolai Tolstoy. Unlike western monarchies who were subjugated in religious matters to the Pope, the Tsar of the Russian Empire was the supreme authority on religious. Another key feature was related to patrimonialism. In Russia the tsar owned a much higher proportion of the state (lands, enterprises, etc.) than did Western monarchs. The tsarist autocracy had many supporters within Russia. “Be more autocratic than Peter the Great and sterner than Ivan the Terrible.” -Tsarina…

    • 4116 Words
    • 17 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Socialists led by Lenin and Trotsky overthrow imperial order and execute Tsar and his family in July 1918…

    • 1287 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    In 1894 Russia’s last tsar, Nicholas II, inherited the throne when he was unprepared to do so. It is hard to do something when you are not ready. It is like letting a bull out of the chute when you were not ready, so you fall, but in Nicholas’s case a lot of things came down with him.…

    • 247 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    By 1917 most Russians had lost faith in the leadership of Tsar Nicholas II. The first part of the Russian Revolution of 1917 was Russia's terrible involvement in World War I (1914-1918). Militarily, imperial Russia was no match for industrialized Germany, and the Russian death toll was greater than those sustained by any nation in any previous war. ("History.com"). The February Revolution started March 8, 1917 when rioters rioted for bread took to the streets in the Russian capital of Saint Petersburg. Troops were sent to Saint Petersburg to stop the riots; they opened fire and killed the people. In response to the way the riots were being handled Tsar Nicholas II gave up the throne on March 15. The October Revolution or Bolshevik Revolution was led by Vladimir Lenin who launched a nearly bloodless battle against the ad hoc government ("History."). The Bolsheviks and their allies occupied government buildings and other strategic locations in Saint Petersburg, and soon formed a new government with Lenin as its head; he became the virtual dictator of the first Marxist state in the world.…

    • 985 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    How far were the divisions among its opponents responsible for the survival of the Tsarist rule in the years 1881-1905?…

    • 756 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Bibliography: Auty, Robert, and Dimitri Obolensky. 1976. "An Introduction to Russian History (Companion to Russian Studies;1)." Brisol, Great Britain : Cambridge University Press Ltd.…

    • 1742 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Better Essays

    Like his father, Nicholas was prepared by his tutor Constantine Pobedonostsev, an extreme nationalist, who instilled in Nicholas a stubborn belief in the divine right of kings and absolute power. Many historians such as George F. Kennan, argue that it was this wholehearted belief and upholding of autocracy, which was in fact, the main reason for the March Revolution in 1917. By 1905, the changing needs of the rapidly industrialized Russia were disregarded by Nicholas, who instead ruthlessly repressed any opposition to the government and its’ autocratic system. Nicholas’ heavy censorship and policing developed a huge level of oppression and discontent amongst the Russian public. Protest was met with relentless violence such as the Bloody Sunday incident on the 22ND January 1905. With over 1000 civilians killed by Nicholas’ army, the massacre which came to be known as “Bloody Sunday” highlighted the regime’s brutal approach and the Tsar’s autocratic unwillingness to address the issues of the Russian population. The incident caused a significant decline in the Tsar’s authority, destroying Nicholas’ image as the people’s benevolent father. Bloody Sunday also triggered widespread protest and revolt, which led to the 1905 revolution. The growing resentment towards Nicholas was furthered after his failure to accept the Duma which he promised in…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    - Concerned with frontiers and borders, protect territory; (surrounded by Turkey, Iran, China, NK) – brought into conflict with other nations.…

    • 1142 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    The nobles help top jobs in government, the army, the courts, and the Church. They were also exempt from paying taxes, though they resented the royal bureaucracy that employed middle-class men in positions that had once been reserved for them. Both rich and poor members of the Third Estate resented the privileges enjoyed by their social “betters.” Wealthy bourgeois families in the Third Estate could but political office and titles, but the best jobs were still reserved for nobles. Urban workers earned terrible wages.…

    • 696 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Romanov Dynasty has reigned of the great nation of Russia beginning in the year 1613 until 1917. In the following essay the significant factors which lead to the decline and eventually the fall of this 300 year old dynasty will be revealed. These significant factors range from Czar Nicholas II, the Czar of Russia’s autocratic rule, his refusal to meet demands for reform and above all to his incompetency as a leader.…

    • 73 Words
    • 1 Page
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    conditions under the tsar

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There was huge inequality between the rich and poor in Russia. The Bolsheviks wanted the communists should destroy other classes and class is everything.…

    • 285 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays