Every truly extensive society ought to assure the active involvement of youth in all national labours that their opinions are incorporated in growth politics and that youth evolve leading skills. Unfortunately in many parts of the world this category has not been able to display a significant performance in the political suit. Mainly this is due to institutional and politics liability of the nation and society. It is a result of lacking quota systems in political forces and lawsuit of these countries. Hence young people linger on the periphery of political forces.
However in other countries where these instruments already exit, most likely they have not been utilized due to the previous advantages of the founded political elites. The dilemma of nowadays is the constant disability to furnish the adequate policies and economic frameworks for increasing the efficiency of young population. Once naturally may ask “How should nations figure out the role of youth in democratization processes? Shall countries discuss policy alternatives for youth economic improvement? Are governments in charge to address strategies for the recruitment of youth in supporting sustainable democracy and economic growth? Are politicians willing to investigate better policy alternatives to involve young people in institutional, political, democratization and governance issues? What should be the profile of a young leader in this century?
The notion of leadership could be determined as the skill to invigorate people to engage their power to a mutual purpose. It indicates an engagement incarnated in a transformational force, which could convert pledges and dreams into content, the devotion, participation and tenacity of the persons who tender it. Leaders enable their disciples to attain what they were hoping for. The strength of leadership enables to derive from the pursuers, the engagement for the satisfaction of the joint aims of a team,