First lets talk about the Roman army and how it was structured and organized. The Roman army was divided up into legions; with the soldiers being know as legionaries. Each legion was made up of 10 cohorts, with a normal cohort contained 480 soldiers. The first cohort in every legion was larger than the other coherts, which was made up of…
was one of the biggest reasons for the fall. The Roman Empire’s military was the…
Though this would be the primary dominate force on the battlefield, Rome actually lost battles because they were primarily heavy infantry. Roman soldiers adopted fighting tactics of other forces and enemies to become the most elite force on the battle field. Starting out, soldiers fought like the Greek worriers known as hoplites. Hoplites were essentially an infantry man armed with a shield and spear, which were on reserve until called to battle. The tactics that were adopted from the Hoplites was a formation called the Phalanx. This formation consisted of soldiers lining up shoulder to shoulder with their weapon in one hand and shield in the opposite. Not only did this help with shields protecting one another, it made lines impenetrable for arrows, spears and enemy as long as they maintained a solid line side by side.2…
To begin with, military weakness was a big factor in the fall of Rome. According to Document B, “...armor began to seem heavy since the soldiers rarely ever wore it.” This shows that the soldiers were very lethargic and couldn’t protect the empire effectively. They stopped doing their ground drills and never wore the breastplates. When war came to Rome they weren’t prepared to wear the armor, so instead they fought with…
Legionaries carried small javelins called pilum and would throw them en masse as the formations got close to each other. The tips were made of a soft metal, with the rest of it being made of wood that was designed to bend after impact so as to render it useless and would not allow the enemy to throw them back. These javelins would often impact enemy shields and embed themselves into them rendering the shield useless due to the heavy, awkward weight of the javelin sticking out, striping the enemy of some their protection. Closer in the Romans relied on a short, very well tapered, stabbing sword to attack their enemies with called a gladius. Legionnaires were also equipped with a small dagger but this is more for use outside of combat but could probably be used as a last resort if the need…
Have ever wondered why the Roman Empire fell? This fall has been an ongoing process for more than a century. The falling of the Roman Empire was caused by poor military, deadly illnesses, and disaster and destruction.…
The Han and Roman Empires are highly praised with great wealth, inventions, and their success.While both societies saw new technological advancements as necessary, the Han dynasty always sought the most efficient route, the romans prioritized speed and was not very fond of craftsmanship.…
Although the empire had an advanced military for the most part, the Roman military had difficulty fending off the multiple invaders that were attacking at different areas of the empire. For example, Rome had to keep their military focused in Italy to fight in civil wars, leaving the border of Rome unprotected and easy to target for outside kingdoms and civilizations (“Ten Theories On The Fall Of Rome”). The barbarian invasions also had an affect on how much money and…
From C.A. 300 CE to 476 CE Rome began a steady decline to its collapse. Some historians disagree with this and have other theories. One of the other theories is that the Roman Empire did not collapse as the Eastern Empire did not collapse until “Fall of Rome at Constantinople in 1453.” The base of this theory is that the Eastern Empire became the Byzantium Empire, however it was no longer the Roman Empire as there were no longer any Roman Emperors. Another theory by Peter Wells is “The Roman Empire “fell” only in the minds of people who had a particular and limited view of what the Roman Empire was and who understood events such as Alaric’s capture of Rome in A.D. 410 as marking its end.” Wells argues that the change was extremely gradual and continued well past 476 CE. While Wells theory is more valid, the empire still did not exist after 476 CE.…
There were different groups of the roman army. The 8 soldiers that made up a tent were called a conterberium. 1 conterberium was in charge of a conterberium.Ten conterberium is called a century.6 centuries will make up a chort. Ten cohorts would make up a legion. A legion is about 6,000 soldiers. In 123 BC the roman government started providing the legion with equipment. There was not a lot of armor sets so some men wore different armor. One of the main reasons rome was powerful was because of its army. The roman army was advanced for it’s time. A legionnaire had to be a roman citizen and had to be 17 or older. A legionnaire signed up for 25 years of service and old legionnaires retired together. An auxiliary soldier was someone who was not a roman citizen. they often fought on the front lines. The roman catapults were called orangers and the roman army cold march 20 miles a day with their armor on. That is why I Gave the roman empire an +A on prepare for a common…
The response of the Romans was hampered by the absence of the Roman legions, which were already engaged in fighting a revolt in Spain and the Third Mithridatic War. Furthermore, the Romans considered the rebellion more a policing matter rather than a war. Rome dispatched militia under the command of praetor Gaius Claudius Glaberus, which besieged the slaves on the mountain, hoping that starvation would force the slaves to surrender. They were surprised when Spartacus had ropes made from vines, climbed down the cliff side of the volcano with his men and attacked the unfortified Roman camp in the rear, killing most of them. The slaves also defeated a second expedition, nearly capturing the praetor commander, killing his lieutenants and seizing the…
In his novel, The Divide: American Injustice in the Age of the Wealth Gap, Matt Taibbi juxtaposes the wealthy and the poor in order to illustrate the disparity between the treatment of high-class criminals and lower-class citizens. The novel also notes the growth of the inequality and the schism between the classes. He uses illuminating narratives from both of the classes to demonstrate the huge difference between the rich and the poor in terms of how they are treated by the American justice system. Taibbi’s book opened my eyes to the extent of this injustice and from that I have learned a great deal, most which I can apply to my position as a Resident Advisor.…
Without a strong economy a nation is nothing. Things like unemployment, inflation, and overspending by the government can all wreak havoc on a nation and its citizens, and Rome was no stranger to these issues. Like all things in life, Rome’s massive army and territorial expansions came with a price, a very high price to be more specific. These constant wars had resulted in a tremendous amount of oppressive taxation and over spending. This eventually leads to inflation and increased the wealth gap between the rich and the poor which created tension amongst the people . Much of Rome’s economy also relied on slave labor, these slaves were seized from newly acquired territories, however, as the expansion of Rome came to a stop,…
The essay “Masculinity as homophobia” by Michael S. Kimmel talks about how masculinity and homophobia go hand in hand with each other. Trying to prove ourselves masculine, makes us change how we really are, showing a different face than what we want to show. Homophobia is the fear of not measuring up as a real man. We are afraid of being humiliated by other men. All this leads to silence, to a silence that shows that we agree with the things that are done to women, to gays and lesbians.…
During the Colonial period there was a lot of different outlooks on how the women were treated, how the men thought, how the children were raised. Colonization is dominating land, and its components. What I learned about the colonial period is that how they did things back then, is not how we do them now, they were more strict, powerful, demeaning. The first thing I realized about the colonial period had a difficult time seeing women, and men as equal.…