Top-Rated Free Essay
Preview

The Scarlet Letter

Good Essays
464 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Scarlet Letter
Sabrina Chaffins
AP World History
Mrs. James
Compare and Contrast Essay

Imperial Administration in the Han Empire and Imperial Rome

In the ancient times of our world, two very powerful empire/dynasties arose. Han china and Imperial Rome came to be two of the biggest empires that the ancient world had ever known. Both areas conquered vast areas of the eastern hemisphere, however their techniques differed. Although Han China and Imperial Rome were similar in that they both had strong militaries, ultimately they are more different because of political structure and economic abilities. Both of these brilliant empires had strong ecomomic influences. That is how why they had so much control over the the European and Asian continents. Han China and Imprial Rome both provided those continents with a strong economic health. By providing such health, these two empires had much more control over the regions that were there because those regions depended on the Han and Rome. Without those empires the little countries would collapse. So the Han and Roman Empires actually had more control over their trading countries because they could decide whether or not they survived. However, the Han and Roman Empires were not always similar. These two differed in their political approach to administrate their imperialistic valuse onto other regions. The Romans granted citizenship, eventually, to conquered peoples and peoples outsid Italy. Also, the Romans would just leave their conquered people alone unless they rebelled. The Han actually tried to assimulate their conquered people into their society. So the Han empire would be more appealing to a conquered person than the Roman empire would be. Also, the Han and Roman Empires differed with that their militaries are not the same. The Han military is powerful but not as disciplined as the Roman military. The Roman military is powerful and each soldier is sent through rigorious training and disciplinary acts. Plus, the Roman army was divided into units that could maneuver independently and did not have to wait on the rest of the army. The Han army, however, was slower and could not adapt as quickly as the Roman army. Therefore, the Roman army could gather in a place faster and extend their empire further and faster than the Han empire could. In conclusion, even though the Han and Roman empire grew to vast sizes and had similar economic tactics, there military and political approaches differed. These two powerful empires did in fact shock the world because no one had ever seen an empire that size before the Han and Roman. However, the fact that these two empires were great in size also brought each of their downfalls. The downfall of each of these empires was enevitable. However, how they gained there land is what makes these two empires great.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    Whereas Han China from 206 B.C.E. to 220 B.C.E. and the imperial Rome from 31 B.C.E. to 476 C.E. had shared similarities on the territorial boundaries issues, the two empires had different political over the huge amount of land. Known as most powerful empires in history, Han China and Rome utilized idiosyncractic policy to maintain the sovereignty. However, the two states both suffered from the border disputes.…

    • 503 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty were different politically. The Roman Empire was founded on imported agriculture and didn’t have a set bureaucracy. While the emperor of Rome appointed some advisors the government lacked many institutions, such as a planned budget. Apart from the emperor and senate the Romans didn’t have other levels of government; because of this the farther reaches of the Roman Empire had more autonomy. The Han was founded on strict legalism and had a well organized bureaucracy. Even though the emperor had absolute power, institutions such as the Three Councilors of State and Nine…

    • 382 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While Han China and Imperial Rome possess distinct differences, for example, the effects of their collapse and their religious views in government, the similarities between the two are still there, like, the cause of their falls and the ways of leadership over their empires. The Romans and the Han, though they appear very different at a glance do have their similarities. Despite being far in distance, the empires were both different and the same throughout their history and in their untimely…

    • 887 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    The Roman and Han Empires were the most powerful empires among the Classical Empires. Between the fifth century B.C.E. and the fifth century C.E., the Roman empire of the Mediterranean and the Han Empire of China were both influential powers of the Classical Asian and Mediterranean worlds. The Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were similar in their falls because they both fell to nomadic invaders, and because they both fell because of a decline in economic trade. The Han and the Roman Empires were different in their falls because the Han suffered from serious revolts whereas the Romans did not; also the effects of their falls were different because China was able to make a fairly quick comeback whereas Rome was never able to do so.…

    • 315 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    When Han China and Imperial Rome are compared, one can find both similarities and differences in terms of techniques of imperial administration. A similarity would be that both are bureaucracies. However, both are also different. One major difference is that Han China had the civil service exams. They also differed because Han China had a much greater emphasis on religion than the Romans. These differences led to very different futures for the two empires, both of which were among the strongest in the world at the time.…

    • 568 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Han and Rome Comparison

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages

    Han and Rome were two great empires that had similarities and differences. Han and Rome at a similar decline because of the lack of a stable economy. The different political systems caused Han and Rome to rise differently.…

    • 288 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Since Imperial Rome and the Han dynasty were taking places at relatively the same time, they have many similarities. But considering the distance and isolation from each other, many differences also occurred. Both Rome and Han China used technology to improve their empire, but changing your social class rank was very difficult in China, but a bit easier in Rome.…

    • 366 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    Collapse of Rome and Han

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages

    There were many similarities between the fall of the Han and Roman empires. Both of these empires were invaded from foreign forces. Germanic tribes invaded Rome and the Hun invaded the Han empire. The Roman and Han corrupt governments led to the fall of their empires. Power hungry individuals, and internal fights between the elite led to disunity within the Rome and Han. Many weak leaders led to the collapse of the empires. Some rulers, as young as 11, came to power in the Han empire, this led to fights between the royal families.…

    • 308 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Some similarities of imperial administration in Imperial Rome and Han China include the general idea of equality, living under one ruler who gives the people some control, and the roles of families. Both empires believed in generalization of the people. Yes, they had one ruler, but everyone else underneath the ruler was made equal. Both Imperial Rome and Han China are controlled under one central leader.…

    • 386 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    e west and the east, empires dominated the world from the 2nd century BC to the 2nd century AD. The main one in each area being the Roman Empire in the west, and the Chinese empire, or specifically the Han dynasty, in the east. While these two empires are thousands of miles apart and nearly one hundred years, there are many similarities between the two. The most significant difference between the two empires is the basis of government ideals.…

    • 893 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Both the Han Dynasty and the Roman Empire covered a lot of territory in Eurasia. From the year 1000B.C.E. (when the first settlement on the site of Rome occurred) to 600C.E. (just after the fall of both empires) the technological advances made were astonishing. Maps, pictures, and written documents are able to portray the details of what life was like in both of these large empires. All three of these will be used to explain how more technological inventions allowed these two empires to expand their control over the land. Although the Han Dynasty and Roman Empire were both large and powerful, it was mainly due to their technological advances.…

    • 944 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    Roman Vs Han

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages

    The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty are some of the earliest empires that existed. They both lasted around four hundred years (Roman Empire lasted from around 37 B.C.- 476 A.D. and the Han Dynasty lasted from around 206 B.C.-220 A.D.). During this time these civilizations were the most powerful in the world. At their height, these empires had populations of around fifty million people, and they both covered approximately two million square miles. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both sought to protect their trade routes (the Roman Empire had the Mediterranean and the Han Dynasty had the Silk Road). They protected their trade routes by expanding their empires into these territories. Both empires had economies based off of agriculture, so for them the more land they owned the wealthier the empire was. These empires also developed an infrastructure to make communication, access to resources, and movement of military much easier. The Roman Empire and the Han Dynasty both involved in economic activities that were designed to ensure a stable social and political order, and they used bureaucracy and taxation to provision major cities. Both were patriarchal societies where the father of the family had the most power.…

    • 369 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    While both empires had many great rulers who paved the way for greatness there were some people in power that, because of there greediness, caused the downfall of their empire. The Roman Empire and Han Dynasty both fell because of their corrupt leaders.…

    • 666 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Two of the most significant empires of the classical period were the Rome empire and the Han dynasty. Both of these nations developed a well built Bureaucracy, emphasis on family, and boasted the invention of many technological advances. These two powerhouses still affect our everyday lives. However, all good things must come to an end.…

    • 886 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The factors that contributed to the demise of the Roman empire and the Han empire have elements that are the same. The Roman government became less effective due to struggles over who was going to be in power. Twenty-six barrack emperors came and fell from power in a short period of time. Each of these emperors was violently displaced by the general who wanted to be the emperor of Rome next. This is no way to keep government control stable. The constant power struggle led to the government officials being more focused on how to become the next emperor then how to run the…

    • 814 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays