Preview

The Science of Human Cloning

Good Essays
Open Document
Open Document
352 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Science of Human Cloning
Scientists are either very close at being able to clone human beings or scientists have already done it. Human cloning has already become illegal or restricted in a variety of degrees in several countries. The film the island shows how the science can go terribly wrong.

Human life should be left to nature for several reasons. First, they make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. Human organ transplants are used from clones and might increase in the market. Also, when we start cloning, people will make a large amount of certain types of human cloning. They make clones for their health. They will just make it and soon kill it. This may not happen. In this film, clones believe they can go to the island, but it means they will die. For example, clone of Michael Jordon says "no, I don't want to die." We can see that they don't treat the clones like human.

Second, the clients pay lots of money and get internal organs for their health from the clones. They are really expansive when you want to make clones. I think we don't need to make clones by paying lots of money. Human life is worth more than money. I think human clones can't assess the value of money, because they are same as human.

Last, clones are human too. They are not just products. They can have feeling like human do. They have dignity, so we have to respect them. In this film, the people brainwash the minds of the clones. They are repeatedly told "You're special, you have a very special purpose in life", but the clones just work and wear only white clothes. It's unfair, because they are human too, but they are prisoned in a limited place.

For these reasons, I am against human cloning. We can't let people make clones for their satisfaction and for commercial purposes. A lot of people worry that cloned people would not have full rights, since they are just copies. I find this reasoning absolutely ridiculous, since a person is a person despite their genetic source or of artificially

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Good Essays

    As revealed earlier, cloning humans has a high failure rate, because there are many barriers put in by nature to prevent an “unnatural” event from occurring. These barriers can happen anytime during the cloning process. For example, the enucleated egg might not be compatible with the donor nucleus, the newly transferred nucleus may not grow and develop properly, the step where the embryo is implanted into the surrogate could fail, or the pregnancy may fail. Even if the pregnancy succeeds, there is no guarantee that the clone will act like a clone unless the right genes are activated. In a transferred human cloning, the scientist has to re-program the nucleus and force it to pretend as if it belongs in an early embryonic stage. If the nucleus is not programmed properly or completely, the embryo will more than likely become abnormal or die. Now, if the embryo manages to pass all of the post-zygotic barriers, “there is a possibility that the [fully developed] cloned individual might carry certain abnormalities…” causing them to live a shorter life span than expected (Wickman). There are also other concerns, besides health-related, such moral issues. The ability to clone individuals could lead to an out-of-control situation created by someone who wants to create an army of genetic replicas by abusing the new…

    • 439 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Clones could be seen as less than animals compared with non-clones” (Quinonez, blog.udemy.com). When I was reading I read that cloning is good for one good reason, to harvest the animal's organs. This idea is so inhumane, according (toblog.udemy.com) “While the cloning of body organs can be a great asset to extending human life, it could also cause a lot of malpractice. This could lead to a rise in malpractices within society.” First, scientist create these disgusting creatures and steal their organs for the purpose of human's life, that is just…

    • 327 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    With the technology available in todays society we now have the ability clone a species, even though it is not accepted by the majority of society. This does prevent a major question do we as Humans have the right to clone a species? Some people say no because it goes against natural selection, if a species was to weak to survive then for the good of the remainder of the world then it does not survive. There is also the possibility like in the movie that even though we think we know everything about this clone things will adapt and evolve to survive such as the dinosaurs evolving to reproduce while they were all females.…

    • 557 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the main issues that cloning brings about is whether or not people will take advantage of this new technology. For instance, Lewis Thomas wonders if “the rich and powerful but socially objectionable” or the “governments of dumb, docile masses” will misuse the technology. These seemingly important people may be able to give themselves a “version of immortality”. Just because the ability to clone exists does not mean that valuable people should be able to multiply themselves. No one on Earth is exactly the same for a reason, and it should stay that way. If there were to be several hundred Paris Hiltons or Kim Kardashians walking around, the world would be a pretty terrifying place. People should remain unique, separate from the “precise sameness” that Thomas…

    • 686 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are some people today that need a kidney or heart any organ. There is some hospital that don’t have organs to replaces. That why people thinking that the more clone we have the better it is for the people who need the organ. The clone has the right to live and have dreams not only as organs donor because the clones are also human. The scientist must have to make the clones with Human DNA. 18 years ago, my mom give birth to me am I a clone? No, I not clone I’m a human just like the student in Hailshaw. Also, maybe it not good idea to use the clone’s organ it may affect the human body. For example, if a scientist did something wrong in the process of making the clones then using their organs to replace the other human organs that small mistake can affect the human body. The human can be created a new disease and spread the disease outside of the world. It can be dangerous to kid and it may kill them. That why I think the guardians should treat the clones like real…

    • 877 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    The Island Research Paper

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Cloning is a naturally occurring phenomenon, as well as a human induced process. A clone is a living organism deriving from another, with identical set of genes. A naturally occurring anthropological example of a clone would be twins, a set of individuals with identical DNA. A laboratory-induced clone would be stem cell production and animal cloning. In the movie The Island by Michael Bay, the concept of cloning is used as a life insurance policy to elongate the life of a natural born individual. This medical use of cloning has been under the experimental stage for quite sometime now and under ethical question. There are three different ways of cloning, recombinant DNA technology or DNA cloning, reproductive cloning, and therapeutic cloning.…

    • 1230 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    There are two main types of human cloning, reproductive and therapeutic. Reproductive human cloning would essentially produce entire, living human beings, whereas therapeutic cloning would only produce parts or pieces such as tissue samples or organs needed for transplantation. The major debate over cloning is an ethical one. Would a clone have the same rights as the original? Would cloning result in a new form of slavery? Personally, I am not sure what the answers to these questions are. But regardless, therapeutic cloning should be allowed because humans are not being created, only the components needed to heal ailing patients.…

    • 1391 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    One of the points mentioned in the essay is about a violation to human dignity. Theologians have said that cloning would be a violation to dignity and that cloned humans would be treated with less respect than other human beings. Macklin contends that clones would share the same rights and dignities as the rest of us. She states that a…

    • 532 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    The clones were purchased by people who wanted to live longer, and when their organs begin to fail they will have a fresh new set to take. The concept of clones is ethically wrong. These children are raised for the sole purpose of organ harvesting and will be killed in the process. “I heard she completed during her second donation.” (p172 Never Let Me Go Pdf)…

    • 499 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    There are people who believe that cloning should be allowed. One of the reasons is that parents can have control in their reproductive lives. Children should be valued by who they are, and parents don’t have the right to choose the physical characteristics or even take away the identities of their children. As a result, cloned children will see themselves as an object but not as a person. Another reason is the possibility of cloning organs to save lives. This argument I see it very insufficient because cloned organs can have some defects and cause some damage in a person’s body and organism if the procedure is not well done. Furthermore most scientists agree that research cloning for medical research is not needed as a source of embryonic stem cells these can be obtained from embryos generated by in vitro fertilization.…

    • 642 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    “ It lays the technical groundwork for cloning-to-produce-children, which raises a host of ethical concerns. It could lead to fetal farming--growing cloned embryos to a later stage so that their valuable organs can be harvested for research or transplantation.” (Stark) This quote shows that clones can be created for their organs which could also help people. “Boisselier said the public needs to know "there is a huge demand" for cloning technology from couples unable to have children.” (Spar) This quote shows that people can use clones as their children if they are unable to have children. As you can see, The evidence shows that cloning would be a big help for…

    • 638 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    Human Cloning

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages

    In the article that I chose there are two opposing viewpoints on the issue of "Should Human Cloning Ever Be Permitted?" John A. Robertson is an attorney who argues that there are many potential benefits of cloning and that a ban on privately funded cloning research is unjustified and that this type of research should only be regulated. On the flip side of this issue Attorney and medical ethicist George J. Annas argues that cloning devalues people by depriving them of their uniqueness and that a ban should be implemented upon it. Both express valid points and I will critique the articles to better understand their points.…

    • 1857 Words
    • 8 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Essay

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages

    Why shouldn't humans attempt to clone living organisms including humans? Why do people think it is wrong? Nevertheless, natural cloning occurs everywhere. All plants, some insects, algae, unicellular organisms that conduct mitosis or binary fissions, and identical twins are all clones of each other. As long as genetic make-up is the same they are considered clones. Cloning would bring endless potentially important benefits to everyday life and more importantly, the future.…

    • 800 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Human Cloning Controversy

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages

    Since the dawn of civilization, mankind has been plagued by innumerable ethical quandaries. From the subjugation of those whose pigment doesn’t match our own to the creation of weapons of mass destruction, history has repeatedly shown us that as the human race progresses, there are always ethical dilemmas that make us question our every step. As our technological capabilities continue to grow at an exponential rate, these predicaments have continued to crop up alarmingly fast. Among the most recent ethical questions to plague our society is the one pertaining to human cloning. Supporters of this potential technological breakthrough cite it as one of the greatest achievement of the human race, while its detractors bemoan the ethics of…

    • 1196 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Cloning Persuasive Speech

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages

    The worst part about cloning animals and humans is it results in failure most of the time. In the article “Arguments for and Against Creating Human Clones”, it states “95-98% of mammalian cloning experiments have resulted in failures in the form of miscarriages, stillbirths, and life- threatening anomalies”. Itś clearly a fail most of the time so why should taxpayers waist money for it? I believe in the fact that everyone in this world is different and unique. Cloning ourselves would lessen our value and our uniqueness. The article “Arguments for…

    • 505 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays