Preview

The Separation of Powers in the Hong Kong Legal System

Powerful Essays
Open Document
Open Document
2782 Words
Grammar
Grammar
Plagiarism
Plagiarism
Writing
Writing
Score
Score
The Separation of Powers in the Hong Kong Legal System
"There should be mutual understanding and support amongst the Executive, the Legislature and the Judiciary institutions."Xi Jinping Vice-President of the People's Republic of China during his visit to the Hong Kong SAR on July 7th, 2008 made the above statement that hit a raw nerve in the public. In response to concerns in the fundamentals of Hong Kong's legal system, Hong Kong Bar Association issued a statement to clarify that the judiciary independence is "firmly guaranteed" by the Basic Law, which is to "remain separate and independent from the Executive and the Legislature" and shall not be "regarded as a part of the governance team" (Hong Kong Bar Association, 2008).

This paper examines related Articles of the Basic Law, legislatures and ordinances to understand how the separation of powers comes in to play in Hong Kong SAR and identifies the relations of the three powers while reviewing relevant cases that have impacted the system.

The concept of separation of powers had rooted in Hong Kong from its colonial past but it was not until July 1st, 1997 had the system been put into practice with a codified constitution that laid down the legal foundations. One of the most important general principles of the Basic Law is the authorization of the region to maintain a system of executive, legislative and independent judicial power (BL 2), which concept is very different from the centralized governing power of the mainland political system. The structure of the Basic Law provides for the clear separation of powers. Under Chapter IV, the provisions for political structure are divided into sections according to the governmental bodies, in which the institutions and power of the executive, legislative and judiciary branches are distinctively outlined.

Headed by the Chief Executive (BL 43), Government is the executive authority of the Hong Kong SAR (BL 59), while the Legislative Council is the legislature (BL 66) and the judicial power is exercised by the courts at all



Bibliography: arney, G. (1993, September 13). Separation of Powers in the Westminster System. AUSTRALASIAN STUDY OF PARLIAMENT GROUP . Brisbane, Queensland: Parliamentary Education & Training Services, Queensland Parliament. Cheung, A. B. (2007). Executive-Led Governance or Executive Power 'Hollowed-Out '-The Political Quagmire of Hong Kong. Asian Journal of Political Science , 15 (1), 17-38. Ghai, Y. (1999). Hong Kong 's New Constitutional Order (2 ed.). Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press. Hong Kong Bar Association. (2008, July 9). Press Release. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from Hong Kong Bar Association: http://www.hkba.org/whatsnew/press-release/20080709.pdfHong Kong SARLegCo. (2004, September). LegCo Today. Retrieved July 10, 2008, from http://www.LegCo.gov.hk/english/index.htmJudiciary, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2004, October). Guide to Judicial Conduct. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. McInnis, A. (2007). The Legal System of the Hong Kong SAR. In D. K. Srivastava, Business Law in Hong Kong (2nd Edition ed., p. 19). Hong Kong: Sweet & Maxwell Asia. Ng Ka Ling v. Director of Immigration (Court of Final Appeal April 1999). Weng, B. S. (2001). Judicial Independence under the Basic Law. In S. Tsang, Judicial Independence and the Rule of Law in Hong Kong (pp. 48-71). Hong Kong : Hong Kong University Press. Wesley-Smith, P. (1998). An Introduction to the Hong Kong Legal System. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press (China) Ltd. Wesley-Smith, P. (2004). Judges and Judicial Power Under the Hong Kong Basic Law. Hong Kong Law Journal (34), 83.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Better Essays

    When comparing the communist nation of China with the democratic nation of Australia many differences are apparent. The application of the legislative (law making and modifying function), executive (administrative function) and judiciary (law enforcing and dispute resolving function) is vastly different between the two nations as can see when we compare and contrast the underlying principles of each system of government. Firstly, both nations claim to uphold the concept of the rule of law, although due to corruptive forces surrounding the Chinese court system, this concept is often thwarted and equality before the law is not upheld. Within the constitutions of both nations the basic principles of separation of powers have been applied; however on examination of the practice of separation within the nations we find that convention (in the case of Australia) and the corruptive influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) have not allowed such separation. Finally, the representation of the people by each nation’s governments will be compared through examining contrasting election and law making practices. With reference to the three arms of government, the comparisons made between the underlying principles of both China and Australia’s systems of government will support the understanding that democratic nations are a government of the people, by the people, for the people; making them just, whilst communist nations often struggle to provide the same justice and citizen involvement in their political process.…

    • 1333 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Powerful Essays

    To ensure this limitation, the Australian Constitution expressly defines each government institution and provides for their operation within Chapters 1,2, and 3. The effect of this is that the Constitution explicitly enables checks and balances in order to prevent ‘absolutism’ or one institution prevailing over the others.41 Despite the Constitution’s explicit structure to reflect the separation of powers, in reality each form of government branch does coincide, therefore threatening the original intention to uphold the separation of powers imposed by the Constitution.…

    • 2335 Words
    • 10 Pages
    Powerful Essays
  • Good Essays

    Separation of powers is used by the constitution to create a three branches to prevent one branches getting too powerful. The three branches is legislative, executive and judicial. Legislative made up of 2 houses of congress would make the laws. Executive is headed by president would implement and enforce laws that is passed by congress. Judicial system of federal courts interpret the laws.…

    • 293 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Satisfactory Essays

    These materials are designed for use with 2007 Australian Business Law 26th edition by Paul Latimer. They provide a comparative analysis of the Australian legal position with: • • • • • Hong Kong, Singapore, Malaysia, Indonesia, and Sri Lanka.…

    • 457 Words
    • 2 Pages
    Satisfactory Essays
  • Good Essays

    2

    • 3447 Words
    • 12 Pages

    * Give eye contact and actively listen, show them that you are interested through acts of body language like nodding or eye contact…

    • 3447 Words
    • 12 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    In every government there are three sorts of power; the legislative; the executive, in respect to things dependent on the law of nations; and the executive, in regard to things that depend on the civil law.…

    • 804 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    officers, who theoretically represent power and authority in all of Hong Kong, neither of them…

    • 545 Words
    • 1 Page
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    Early Religious Wars

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages

    References: Chapter 7: Separation of Powers (1997). Retrieved July 30, 2009, from SocIndex with Full text Database. (University Library).…

    • 948 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Throughout history, people's attitudes towards death have changed. From accepting to death as a natural part of life, to defying the inevitable, the one fact that remains is that we will die. After visiting Cruikshank’s Funeral Home I now have accepted this fact and pondered what will happen for those close to me when I die. A funeral is a time for valuing the life of the deceased, and I now see the value in allowing those within my life to host a service where they can receive closure, and remember what I have brought to the world. This paper will examine the experience I had at Cruikshank’s funeral home and provide insight as to how my attitudes towards funerals has changed as a result.…

    • 891 Words
    • 4 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Camus' The Plague, the Myth of Sisyphus and the Constitution of the World Health Organization all clarify the relationship between ethics and fiction by focusing on grief and suffering as part of the human experience, as well as reiterating that one can achieve happiness once they accept their fate. When comparing Camus' literary and philosophical pieces, this clarification is quite evident with respect to the analysis of happiness in Camus' Myth of Sisyphus and its application to a specific character in The Plague. The WHO constitution takes an additional step by utilizing happiness as the basis for its principles, which makes me question the efficacy of laws that not only rely on high standards for health, but also negate that the average human experience is not perfect; grief and suffering are inevitable factors in a human life and they are essential to attaining…

    • 1002 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    This is known as the separation of powers. The constitution divides commonwealth powers between three separate bodies as it is necessary in any legal system, for the government to exercise the functions of the legislature, the executive and the judiciary. Each act as a check on the others, to ensure that there is no abuses of power and that constitutional authority is not exceeded. The aim of the separation of powers is to ensure that authority is evenly distributed between these three groups. The legislative function means that laws must be made, and the parliament is made up of representatives elected by the people. The administrative executive function consists of public service and cabinet. This power ensures that the laws are administered or executed. The judicial function is responsible for interpreting the law and when dispute arises. The court system, independent judges and magistrates exercise this power. The separation of powers is demonstrated in the case of the Australian communist party vs. the commonwealth of Australia in…

    • 740 Words
    • 3 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Better Essays

    One Country, Two Systems

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages

    FEI, L. (2009). Enforcement of Arbitral Awards between Hong Kong and Mainland China: A Successful Model?. Chinese Journal Of International Law, 8(3), 621-636.…

    • 1070 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Better Essays

    This essay will seek to analyse the doctrine of the separation of powers and the importance of its presence within a constitution. Particular emphasis will be placed on identifying how this idea is incorporated into the United Kingdom’s (UK) constitution and the effect that recent developments of constitutional reform such as the introduction of the UK Supreme Court in place of the House of Lords has had.…

    • 1468 Words
    • 6 Pages
    Better Essays
  • Good Essays

    Article 16 of the Bill of Rights protects the freedom of opinion and expression of everyone. Also according to the Article 27 of the Basic Law, “Hong Kong residents shall have freedom of speech, of the press and of publication; freedom of association, of assembly, of procession and of demonstration; and the right and freedom to form and join trade unions, and to strike.” This means that the freedom of Hong Kong residents in doing the above acts should not be restricted. So, if a particular law offenses the freedom given by the Article 27 of the Basic Law, it contravenes with the Basic Law.…

    • 2225 Words
    • 7 Pages
    Good Essays
  • Good Essays

    Theoretically, checks and balance is essentially important between the Executive-Legislative branches in democratic regimes, it can prevent power dominate by either one branch which may result to “absolute power makes absolute corrupt and incompetent”-- Duke Clinton. However, the central government wants to assure the transition of Macau sovereignty from Portugal to China smooth and stable, and on the other hand, she also wants to develop a system that is convenient in monitoring Macau SAR government’s activities, and ensure Macau is running within the motherland’s state strategy. Therefore, the Basic Law of Macau has given more power to the Executive Branch than the Legislative Branch. This inclination of power provided by the Basic Law of Macau makes Macau SAR becoming an Executive-led government. In the following, we will discuss in detail about how the Basic Law shows Executive-led government.…

    • 1121 Words
    • 5 Pages
    Good Essays