Professor Joanne Freeman unravels her plan for her class to make them be aware of the how the American Revolution came about but to get passed most but not all of the dates and facts of the war. Freeman explains that the American Revolution entailed some remarkable transformations like, converting British colonists into American revolutionaries. This lecture examines the American Revolution from a broad perspective. The best part about her lecture is that she breaks it down into five easy steps to understand, and for her being a professor at Yale she probably is one of the top favorite teachers just because of how easy she breaks her lectures down. Freeman relates herself to one of the Founders, John Adams, because he wasn’t up to the status quo of every other Founder as she states it. John was humorous…
The benefit of hindsight allows modern historians to assume that colonists in British America united easily and naturally to throw off the bonds of tyranny in 1775-1776. The fact that "thirteen clocks were made to strike together" (p.4) surprised even the revolutionary leader John Adams. Prior to the mid-1700s many residents of British North America saw themselves in regional roles rather than as "Americans", they were Virginians or Bostonians, regional loyalties trumped any other including those as British colonial citizens. In T. H. Breen's work, The Marketplace of Revolution, he offers an explanation for the sudden creation of a unique American identity. In his words, "What gave the American Revolution distinctive shape was an earlier transformation of the Anglo-American consumer marketplace" (p. xv). Breen contends that before Americans could unite to resist the British Empire, they needed to first develop a unity and trust with one another in spite of their regional differences. "The Marketplace of Revolution argues, therefore, that the colonists shared experience as consumers provided them with the cultural resources needed to develop a bold new form of political protest" (p. xv). The transformation of the consumer marketplace allowed the colonists of British North America to create a unique British and the American identity that would later result in revolution and the formation of a new nation. This trust based on consumption, Breen concludes, was absolutely necessary for the boycott movement to be an effective tool against the British government. "Unless unhappy people develop the capacity to trust other unhappy people protest remains a local affair easily silence by traditional authority" (p.1).…
Rise to Rebellion, by Jeff Shaara, is the first volume to Shaara's two-part chronicle of the entire American Revolution; starting with the events of the Boston Massacre in March of 1770 and ending with the signing of The Declaration of Independence in 1776. Shaara attempts to relate to us the events as if each character he focuses on is telling the reader the story directly. In attempting to do this Shaara provides us with personal experiences, thoughtful dialogue, and what the characters are thinking- but these must be thought of as fiction. Shaara included these to give the book more depth, not to be historically accurate to the last words of dialogue. For example, there is no way anyone can know for sure what the…
William Dawes was a famous tanner and patriot from Massachusetts during the 1775 American Revolution. He was born on April 6th, 1745 in Boston. He was the second child out of twelve belonging to William Dawes, his father of the same name, and his mother, Lydia Boone. In 1767, Dawes was one of the 650 people to sign the “Non-important Agreement”, which prevented them from buying imported goods from Britain. The things he was prevented from buying include clothing, furniture, various spices, and more. But he pulled through, as in 1768, he joined the ancient and honorable artillery company, a private training organization and was promoted to second major of the regiment of the Boston militia. Later, in October of 1774, be planned a break-in at…
Leading up to the fierce and fiery confrontations at Lexington and Concord, a tumultuous period of debate and negotiation ensued regarding the preferred response of the colonies to British encroachment on their rights. The meeting of Virginian representatives in March of 1775 would prove to be a fruitless affair; that is, until a young, ardent lawyer by the name of Patrick Henry delivered an impassioned oration, with the intent of elucidating upon the reality of the situation: that the then-colonies were being driven to militant opposition of their royal overlords, and that to continue on passively would be to “retreat...[into] submission and slavery.” In his speech, Patrick Henry persuades the convention, and thereby the people, of the necessity of revolution through his employment of metaphorical imagery, stylized religious and mythological allusions, and a slew of rhetorical questions. In a blaze of libertarian sentiment, Henry incited the passions of the delegates and set the stage for the most glorious revolution in the history of mankind.…
On the night of December 16, 1773, a band of Bostonians dressed as Native Americans boarded the British merchant ship Dartmouth and two other companion vessels anchored at “Griffin's Wharf” in Boston harbor. The Americans who had around 70 men, all hated the tea tax.There mission to destroy all the cargo of British East India Company tea. Many years later George Hewes shoemaker and participant in the Boston tea party. He remembered "We then were ordered by our commander to open the hatches and take out all the chests of tea and throw them overboard. And we immediately proceeded to execute his orders, first cutting and splitting the chests with our tomahawks, so as thoroughly to expose them to the effects of the water." Urged on by a crowd of cheering townspeople. The Bostonians destroyed 342 chests of tea estimated to be worth between 10,000 and 18,000 in their currency. This event became known as the Boston Tea Party that pushed us towards the American Revolution.…
I decided to select, Johnny Tremain, for my book report because of the fundamental and universal ideas the author, Esther Forbes, employs. Throughout the book, Forbes displays the dynamic of his characters and how the American Revolution transformed these boys into men. I appointed this book over others because of its underlying messages about Family, Friendship, and Patriotism. The cover of the book is nothing special, but displays the Revolution as a coming of age. The story begins by describing the life of the most gifted silversmith apprentice in Boston, Johnny Tremain. Tremain is determined to become the best silversmith but that takes a drastic turn when he decides to work on the sabbath and when Dove, one of the other apprentices hands him a broken crucible as a prank, it results in an accident that disfigures his hand and thus ends his career as a silversmith. Tremain tries to find a job, and finds one with his best friend Rab as a newspaper…
The Shoemaker and the Tea Party gives us a key insight to the happenings of the American Revolution from the perspective of someone who was actually there and the general public, not just a bystander but someone who was involved and caught up in these key turning points and is now just looking back years after the fact. George Robert Twelves Hewes was a Boston Shoemaker who was an active participant in key turning points in the American Revolution such as the Boston Massacre and The Boston Tea Party. But this book also delves into the detail of when were these events actually considered turning points and when did they start calling them “events”.…
Moreover, the aftermath of the Boston Tea Party resulted in the British Parliament wanting to make the colonists pay for their actions. Lord North, who was the Prime Minister of Great Britain, was forced with many complaints and comments from British parliament regarding their authority over the American colonists. In response to the tea account that happened on December 16, 1773, the British swiftly closed all ports of Boston for any kind of trade until all tea that was destroyed was paid for (Foner 147-148). In addition, British parliament put into action two more regulations that limited colonists’ freedom rights after the Boston Tea Party account. The push of supremacy from the British led the American colonists to stand up and fight for their freedom. Furthermore, Hewes historical account allowed American’s to receive a primary insight from a major participant regarding an event that shaped “America” into what it is today. Without the determination of the colonists to defend their liberty, we might have never had the pivotal moment that made American’s stand their ground, that led to the signing of the Declaration of…
The colonist fell intolerable of British rule after much economic and physical abuse. . George R.T Hewes was regarded as “living history” when he gave his accounts of what happened during the revolution. 1 George’s story is vital for history purposes because he gives firsthand details on how life was growing up in the colonies as a poor man, as a protestor and as a patriot. Although Hewes did not gain any riches or instant popularity from being a patriot, he did gain liberty to think of himself as a better man. After fighting and protesting side by side with the Sons of liberty and other patriotic men, George Robert Twelves Hewes discovered that he is indeed equal to any man despite being a poor shoe maker.1 George Hewes is a symbol for the ordinary man that existed and participated in the events during the…
In the story "John Adams and the Coming of the Revolution”, author David McCullough discusses how John Adams was asked to defend the British soldiers in court of the soldier’s accusation of man slaughter, following the Boston Massacre. Being such a problematic case that could ruin his reputation, John Adams accepted to defend the soldiers because of his experience in difficult cases, and his strong principles and beliefs. John Adam’s reputation did not even tarnish because of how skillfully he handled the case gaining the respect of the people of Boston.…
My father was a local merchant in the city of Boston in 1764 when Parliament passed The Sugar Act1 in yet another attempt to increase Britain’s revenue after the end of the Seven Years War. One of nine children, my family struggled financially during the upcoming years. I suppose my parents worried constantly that we would suffer economic loss as Great Britain passed many taxation acts2 which further tightened any financial gain attained from the trade of goods. My father was friends with Samuel Adams3 and one cold winter night I snuck out, following my father, as I knew something big was about to happen. Father had been ranting all through supper how Parliament needed to be taught a lesson and he and Sam had gathered several men to protest this taxation without our consent.4 Hidden in the fog on the night on December 16, 1773, at the age of fifteen; I watched as my father, along with several other men dressed as Indians, threw barrels and barrels of tea shipped from the East India Company into the waters of the harbor.5 It was this event that made me determined, like my father, to remain true as a patriot and take a stance against the imperial government. This night was just the beginning of the political, economical, and social issues that I witnessed throughout the next two decades.…
The analogy of the shoemaking bench as a body is evident in this passage in order to demonstrate how Mr. Lorry and Miss Pross destroying Dr. Manette’s precious thing emphasizes the deep sensation of guilt created within them. Although the doctor agrees to have his bench and tools demolished, they still didn’t feel right about doing so. That was because it was the doctor’s only escape from his imprisonment, however it was also a supporter of his relapse, so it had to be done. Both Mr. Lorry and Miss Pross are very moral characters, thus, incinerating the bench to them was like, “the burning of the body (previously reduced to pieces convenient for the purpose) was commenced without delay in the kitchen fire” (188). Having the bench compared…
In an attempt to civilize the patriotic memory of the Tea Party, the genteel “ladies” ironically participated in parties that domesticated the tradition of dissent with toy chests of tea, women dressed in “ye old costumes”, actual drinking of tea and speakers who espoused America’s exceptionalism while also dismissing the “lawless violence” of the Boston Tea Party.8 For example, Robert C. Winthrop, a Republican congressman and president of the Massachusetts Historical Society disavowed the “destruction of the tea” saying, “We are not here today I think to glory over a mere act of violence, or a merely successful destruction of property.”8 Other speakers at the city-sponsored celebration continued to tone down controversy in the Tea Party narrative. These popular parties attempted to tame its memory, concealing its radical and rebellious history, making its memory a literal tea party. In contrast to to the genteel ladies celebrating the Boston Tea Party as an eloquent reminder of the country’s greatness, the suffragists resurrected the voices of the early protestors to remind the nation how much of that greatness had yet to be…
Young, Alfred F. The Shoemaker and the Tea Party: Memory and the American Revolution. Boston: Beacon Press, 1999. Print.…